>
> Compiling on the target is very unusual, and slow. Crosscompiling +
> running tests on qemu looks like a better option IMHO.
>
The ubuntu-arm, arch-arm community and the like would say the opposite
(i.e. think of a powerful board like beagle). While scratchbox was also a
"cross-compilation" en
> From: "shane.kea...@accenture.com"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:12 AM
> Subject: RE: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1
> platforms
>> Win8 support would be nice to add, but please do not drop WinXP.
>> MS may be dropping official, public support for WinXP
Hi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rutledge Shawn
wrote:
>
> Well it's so uncommon to do builds right on the ARM platform, and maybe our
> CI is not currently set up to cross-compile on one platform and run tests on
> another? But it's probably possible to do with a few Raspberry Pi's or some
On 7 Nov 2012, at 1:26 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kate Alhola wrote:
> There are no longer ANY mobile platform among Tier-1 platforms at all.
> "linux-arm7-gcc-wayland Linux, ARM7, Wayland. To be specified in more detail"
> can be MeeGo/SailFish but that's very li
> Win8 support would be nice to add, but please do not drop WinXP.
> MS may be dropping official, public support for WinXP in 2014; but it will
> still be around for a very long time.
> Ben
Are you referring to XP for embedded? (which survives until 2016)
I'd strongly advise anyone not to use a
On 13 Nov 2012, at 14:17, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since there hasn't been strong objections against the list I updated the page
> (starting with a more general note that Windows, Linux and Mac OS X are the
> supported platforms, as Thiago suggested) : http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5 .
>
> From: Koehne Kai
> Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
> maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit. Problems I see is that we don't test it
> right now in the CI system, and that e.g. qtwebkit has currently problems on
> windows 64 bit.
Agree with comments alrea
On terça-feira, 13 de novembro de 2012 07.02.40, Charley Bay wrote:
> > Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
> > maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit.
>
> Really? I would assume that 32-bit is still a significantly-large
> audience that we could *add* 64-bit, but t
> Friedemann said he'd like to have msvc 2010 64 bit as reference platform,
> maybe replacing msvc 2010 32 bit.
Really? I would assume that 32-bit is still a significantly-large
audience that we could *add* 64-bit, but that we likely would need to
keep 32-bit (for a while).
Have developers reall
Hi,
Since there hasn't been strong objections against the list I updated the page
(starting with a more general note that Windows, Linux and Mac OS X are the
supported platforms, as Thiago suggested) : http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5 .
That doesn't mean though that we can't extend it further ..
Hi,
We are happy to announce that Qt 5 beta 2 is available for download at
http://qt-project.org/downloads.
More information about the release can be found at the blog post:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/11/13/qt-5-0-beta-2-is-out/ and at
http://qt-project.org/
Looking forward to seeing
11 matches
Mail list logo
