Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

> > we (RIM) currently have an own Jenkins setup which builds Qt for > BlackBerry 10 (ARM and x86), and also runs auto tests (currently only > QtCore classes unfortunately). The process of making that Jenkins node > public including build / test logs etc. is currently stuck in a company > security

[Development] Can someone take a look at this review?

Hello, Could anyone with knowledge take a look at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,38900 ? I know it hasn't been stale for long, but I would like to make sure it will not fall in the review limbo. Thanks a lot, Rafael -- ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ ** Rafa

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

Hello, On 11/07/2012 01:26 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > (...) > I have always been surprised why there has no been more work done on the > CI front towards the very common ARM platform. I had to catch common ARM > issues on Harmattan and elsewhere (not only mobile phone material) that > pretty much ca

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kate Alhola wrote: > There are no longer ANY mobile platform among Tier-1 platforms at all. > "linux-arm7-gcc-wayland Linux, ARM7, Wayland. To be specified in more > detail" can be MeeGo/SailFish but that's very little for us, mobile > developers. Why there is not

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

> >From: Kate Alhola mailto:kate.alh...@gmail.com>> >Date: keskiviikkona 7. marraskuuta 2012 13.49 >To: Koehne Kai mailto:kai.koe...@digia.com>> >Cc: "development@qt-project.org" >mailto:development@qt-project.org>> >Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal: New list

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

There are no longer ANY mobile platform among Tier-1 platforms at all. "linux-arm7-gcc-wayland Linux, ARM7, Wayland. To be specified in more detail" can be MeeGo/SailFish but that's very little for us, mobile developers. Why there is not even Android even it is leading mobile platform and Qt works

Re: [Development] Issues with compiling Qt-Creator on windows

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Majid Khan > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 12:08 PM > To: Ziller Eike > Cc: Qt Development > Subject: Re: [Development]

Re: [Development] Issues with compiling Qt-Creator on windows

any help on this would be greatly appreciated. thanks On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Majid Khan wrote: > I am now using Qt creator to build qt creator and my build step currently > look like: > > qmake.exe qtcreator.pro -r -spec win32-msvc2010 > "CONFIG+=declarative_debug" > > and my private f

Re: [Development] about directfbegl platform

On Mon, November 05, 2012 12:10:05 PM thouraya andolsi wrote: > Hi, > > > I compiled Qt-5.0.0-beta1 release for armv7/directfb platform. > After compiling and installing sucessfully, I tried to run MiniBrowser, but > I has got the following error: > > ./MiniBrowser -platform directfbegl http://

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

Hi, I am wondering if windows-7-64-msvc2010-angle should become a reference platform and windows-7-32-msvc2010-angle a tier 1 instead, given that Windows is 64bit now and running 32 bit applications is not really native. I understand there are practical problems to getting that tested in the C

Re: [Development] Qt5 Beta/Qt Quick 2.0 and Antialiasing

On Wed, November 07, 2012 09:34:49 AM Sean Harmer wrote: > On Tuesday 06 November 2012 18:47:43 Thomas Senyk wrote: > > On Tue, October 30, 2012 11:14:46 AM Labs, Torsten wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > we created some prototype with Qt Quick 2 on a ARM board. Its running > > > verry > > > well ex

Re: [Development] QT.module.rpath is not used properly

On Tue, November 06, 2012 08:21:24 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:17:04PM +0100, Thomas Senyk wrote: > > I got a self-written mkspec for the rasp-pi and everything is working as > > expected. > > > > With one exception, for external applications he is not adding the prop

Re: [Development] Common base class for all socket types

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:47:58PM -0700, d3fault wrote: > On 11/6/12, Corentin Jabot wrote: > > I dont see how the connectTo* methods could be shared, and I don't > > think it would be a good idea to try to do so. > > > I disagree. Having a QList and then being able to > iterate over them and con

Re: [Development] Qt5 Beta/Qt Quick 2.0 and Antialiasing

On Tuesday 06 November 2012 18:47:43 Thomas Senyk wrote: > On Tue, October 30, 2012 11:14:46 AM Labs, Torsten wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we created some prototype with Qt Quick 2 on a ARM board. Its running > > verry > > well except antialiasing. As i can see in the Qt5 Documentation there is a > >

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

On 6.11.2012 23.02, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > >The above looks fine. I'd just like to be clear that the reference >platforms >are, generically: > - Windows > - Mac OS X > - Linux (Wayland and X11) > >and that you're just being specific of what that means at this particular >point >in time. T