Am 01.10.2012 11:57, schrieb Rutledge Shawn:
> On Sep 21, 2012 w38, at 10:37 AM, ext Ziller Eike wrote:
>>
but that would be a huge waste of system resource and performance
drag when running on non-retina system. Are there any better solutions?
>>>
>>> Aren't you seeing the window size in
Hi,
_State of Qt 5.0.0 beta 2_
Here is an overview of the top issues that the releasing team is following. If
you see that there are issues that needs to be handled for Qt 5.0.0, that is
not covered here. Please let us know
_Ensuring that everything is handled_
The list of items that needs to
Hi,
The following statements have triggered this work:
- "We have too many examples."
- "We need more good demos."
- "Some examples are really outdated."
- ...and more..
Bottom line: Our examples need cleaning up!
Examples are of course very important for those who want to get started with
Qt,
Samuel:
> Specifying that all characters must be 5mm in physical height is
> typically not what a UI wants in any case, since different types of
> displays (mobiles / tablets, computer monitors, and TVs) are typically
> viewed at different distances.
In my world (medical devices), it's entirely
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> Is your workaround for building inside scratchbox to set the CROSS_COMPILE
>> variable to empty, i.e. pass -device-option CROSS_COMPILE="" ?
>
> Unfortunately that had still caused the error when I tried, so I used
> CROSS_COMPILE="/usr/bin/".
> Is your workaround for building inside scratchbox to set the CROSS_COMPILE
> variable to empty, i.e. pass -device-option CROSS_COMPILE="" ?
Unfortunately that had still caused the error when I tried, so I used
CROSS_COMPILE="/usr/bin/". Very nasty, I agree. :-)
It also shows that we would need
