Re: [Development] [Releasing] Beta 2 release

2012-09-23 Thread Stephen Chu
On 9/23/12 9:18 AM, Stephen Chu wrote: > On 9/22/12 4:55 PM, Jiang Jiang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Chu wrote: >>> And also this one for consideration: >>> >> >> At least this issue is fixed by 75cd2dec71d8186

Re: [Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

2012-09-23 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Thiago Macieira schreef op vr 21-09-2012 om 16:47 [+0200]: > Include the major version number (5) in all library base names Hi, As the person who filed the mentioned QT-BUG in the first place I would like to let you know that I'm +1 to the proposal from Thiago. For the people who don't know me ye

Re: [Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

2012-09-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 18.00.26, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > > > It seems like it would be nice for pkg-config files to be able to > > > > > contain > > > > > a > > > > > maximum version number for some start-number. Is that possible? > > > > > > > > Sorry, what? I didn't understand. > >

Re: [Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

2012-09-23 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 16:06:46 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 13.10.32, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > In transition times, distros either have to be more exact (add < 5.0) or > > change the name entirely (Qt5Core -> Qt6Core). > > We do not want them to rename. That

Re: [Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

2012-09-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 13.10.32, Stephen Kelly wrote: > In transition times, distros either have to be more exact (add < 5.0) or > change the name entirely (Qt5Core -> Qt6Core). We do not want them to rename. That would be bad for everyone involved. So they need to replace the requirem

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Beta 2 release

2012-09-23 Thread Stephen Chu
On 9/22/12 4:55 PM, Jiang Jiang wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Chu wrote: >> And also this one for consideration: >> > > At least this issue is fixed by 75cd2dec71d81868e1c4d5df32eb602faeb165fc. > > Looks like "autom

Re: [Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

2012-09-23 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Friday, September 21, 2012 18:16:48 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > find_package(QtCore VERSION 5) > > > > or > > > > find_package(QtCore VERSION 6) > > This is the right way of doing it, I agree up to here. > provided that the VERSION is mandatory. But I don't agree with this. Anyway, I th

Re: [Development] qmake qt5

2012-09-23 Thread Sylvain Pointeau
> > You should not need to specify TARGET. qmake chooses a default value. > But .pro files that explicitely set TARGET to be empty will produce empty > TARGET variables in Qt 5. > > yes it was the issue, thank you very much for your help ___ Development m

Re: [Development] Documentation and Modularization

2012-09-23 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hi, since we were discussing how to maintain QDoc and how to fix issues, I poked at doxygen again. I also sent a mail to it's maintainer who responded quickly and friendly. I'm not sure if we want to go down this route, but it seems an option to me. It means a lot of work, but so does maintaining