Hi, list!
I want write a PrecompiledHeader.cmake to support PCH for QtCreator.
For now, It works well use MSVC, see:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,34052
I have some trouble with how to get GCC's compile flags / definitions /
include_directories.
My way (does not work yet):
> macro(get
Hi,
I don't know if I my opinion will make any difference, but I totally
agree with Lorn Potter. Thomas has helped me in many problems while I'm
developing my app for BlackBerry PlayBook / BB10 and I could noticed that
he is very involved with Qt Project, also providing very good support for
QtM
On 03.09.2012 16:10, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> My suggestion on how to proceed is to choose one that offers the following or
>> most of the following:
>>
>> - most recent GCC (4.7 preferably, 4.6 if not)
>
> Latest mingw-builds and latest rubenv packages both provide 4.7.1
>
>> - *worki
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 8:50 PM, ext Sean Harmer wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 04 September 2012 04:43:02 Lorn Potter wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I would like to nominate Thomas McGuire as an Approver for Qt Project.
>>>
>>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:tho
On Sep 3, 2012, at 8:50 PM, ext Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2012 04:43:02 Lorn Potter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to nominate Thomas McGuire as an Approver for Qt Project.
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:thomas.mcguire%2540kdab.com,n,z
>> https://coderevie
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 04:43:02 Lorn Potter wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to nominate Thomas McGuire as an Approver for Qt Project.
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:thomas.mcguire%2540kdab.com,n,z
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1000762
>
> He has done quite som
On 3 September 2012 19:43, Lorn Potter wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to nominate Thomas McGuire as an Approver for Qt Project.
Seconded.
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developme
Hi
I would like to nominate Thomas McGuire as an Approver for Qt Project.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:thomas.mcguire%2540kdab.com,n,z
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1000762
He has done quite some work bringing the blackberry backend to QSensors, as
well as other ar
for Qt 5, I de-activated the Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT_EXPR from
qt-5.0/qtbase/src/corelib/global/qcompilerdetection.h
and now webkit is giving an error
In file included from
/Users/sylvain/development/lib/qt-5.0/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/platform/Timer.cpp:27:
In file included from
/Users/sylvain/developmen
Hi there,
First of all it's great that so many people care about Qt on MinGW :)
I think I got now a better understanding of what mingw-64 really is: The
project itself is only about providing the bits' and pieces for gcc compiling
for win32 64 bit. It does _not_ provide official binaries: If y
On segunda-feira, 3 de setembro de 2012 15.03.15, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> I am wondering if we would like to go for a more gender neutral form, e.g.
> by using plural forms like "Maintainers may approve their own change to
> the code they maintain if"
Sure.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT
On Thursday, 2012-08-23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'd like to offer the a clarification and request one change to the commit
> policy regarding the maintainer's privilege. See
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Commit_Policy (point 12)
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/develo
Hello all,
What still needs to be done for the Qt 5.0 documentation/examples (feel
free to add more):
Documentation:
- Verify the content of the current documentation.
See the email from last week
http://www.mail-archive.com/development@qt-project.org/msg05889.html
- Modularize the remaining m
On Sunday 02 September 2012 23:10:18 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When building Qt 5 on big endian host (PPC) I've found moc breaking on Qt
> classes containing Q_PLUGIN_METADATA with
>
> ASSERT: "idx >= 0 && idx < s" in file
> ../../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qvarlength
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> What is the problem with the current thread support in mingw?
When you compile the gcc, you can choose which thread model do you
want to use: win32 or pthread.
In case of pthread the gcc will use the winpthreads package for
threading, and the
>
> It's in mkspecs/qconfig.pri and part of QT_CONFIG (v8snapshot).
>
> Can you check if the configure check for sbox works for you?
>
I have briefly discussed the issue with Simon this morning on IRC, and I
would like to share the gist according to my understanding. Feel free to
fix me, if I am w
Hi,
On Sep 2, 2012, at 9:10 PM, ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When building Qt 5 on big endian host (PPC) I've found moc breaking on Qt
> classes containing Q_PLUGIN_METADATA with
>
> ASSERT: "idx >= 0 && idx < s" in file
> ../../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qvarle
On Sunday, September 02, 2012 08:34:24 PM ext Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > What you're hitting is a bug in qemu while trying to execute mksnapshot,
> > which is trying to fire up the v8 engine. What's strange though is that
> > configure should detect that you're building inside scratchbox and disable
>
On 09/03/2012 09:42 AM, ext Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 02:05 AM, ext David Boosalis wrote:
>> I download the latest beta version of Qt 5.0 onto my Linux box (Kubuntu
>> 12.04) . For a beta it looks real good, but one thing I found
>> concerning was the performance. I mean even running th
On 08/31/2012 02:05 AM, ext David Boosalis wrote:
> I download the latest beta version of Qt 5.0 onto my Linux box (Kubuntu
> 12.04) . For a beta it looks real good, but one thing I found
> concerning was the performance. I mean even running the demo "samegame"
> take over 98% of my cpu. Being th
Hi everybody,
After I've been given a clue about some test features in Qt5 I tried out the
qqmlmoduleplugin test in tests/auto/qml in the Qt source directory.
It turned out that this test failed with the same symptoms we've observed in
out project. I send you a shortend version of the output.
Th
On segunda-feira, 3 de setembro de 2012 08.27.43, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > #include
> > #if defined(__clang__) && !defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
> > # error "C++11 with clang requires libc++ runtime"
> > #endif
>
> But why do we require libc++? What's wrong with using the standard library
> from re
22 matches
Mail list logo
