Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 Beta Performance

2012-08-31 Thread David Boosalis
Interesting that there are no comments on this. Does it mean that only a few of us are seeing poor performance due to some driver issue, or that people aren't concerned with the performance. But wasn't better performance the primary motivation for Qt 5 ? On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Jeff T

Re: [Development] Playground project request

2012-08-31 Thread marius.storm-olsen
My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's CLA as this is part of you PhD? The CLA is in place to both protect users of the code, but also to allow relicensing of the code so it's usable in commercial projects, where GPL or LGPL code would not work. I suggest yo

[Development] Playground project request

2012-08-31 Thread Sandro Andrade
Hi there, I'm starting the development of a Qt-based implementation of OMG's MOF specification, as part of my phd project. As far as I know there is no C++/Qt implementation of MOF, only the Java ones based on Eclipse Modelling Framework (which uses ecore instead of pure MOF). IMO, that could be

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 Beta Performance

2012-08-31 Thread Robert Knight
> it takes 100% CPU when the game is sitting idle. What does the poor man's profiler* say is going on? Regards, Rob. * http://poormansprofiler.org/ On 31 August 2012 19:26, Jeff Tranter wrote: > I see the same thing with the Qt 5 beta 1 installer binary on Ubuntu > Linux 12.04. When running >

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 19.11.47, Laszlo Papp wrote: > Please always try to bring up the topics in the future to the relevant > mailing list when you intend to change the client interface This is not client interface. This is just one of the three available compression schemes. It's n

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
31.08.2012, 15:54, "Thiago Macieira" : > Finally, this *was* a subjective choice: mine. I want to drive adoption of > newer, better technology. LZMA is a great improvement over the compression > technologies used so far and the xz format is getting interesting adoption. LZMA really "is a great i

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 Beta Performance

2012-08-31 Thread Jeff Tranter
I see the same thing with the Qt 5 beta 1 installer binary on Ubuntu Linux 12.04. When running Qt5.0.0beta1/Desktop/Qt/5.0.0-beta1/gcc/examples/qtdeclarative/demos/samegame/samegame it takes 100% CPU when the game is sitting idle. The machine it is running on has Nvidia's OpenGL driver. On 12

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
> > > First: no, that is not true. We will store the upstream tarball as bz2 on > > the Community OBS anyway due to the debian tools and technology on the > > community OBS what we have. > > It's your choice to unpack and repack. > It is our choice, and many others' choice. It would be in my opini

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread BRM
> From: "marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com" > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta > On 31/08/2012 07:29, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > Remember that 7z was fairly unknown at one point too, but has caught on > due to its extremely powerful compression, and is now well known and > accessible anywhere.

Re: [Development] Possible binary compatibility problem in a future Qt version

2012-08-31 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 17:22:39 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2012 16:55:31 Jedrzej Nowacki wrote: > > On Wednesday 29. August 2012 14.46.17 ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > Reviving old thread because it was discussed on IRC: > > > > > > On Friday 08 June 2012 10:31:31 Je

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 31/08/2012 07:29, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13.08.39, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> First: no, that is not true. We will store the upstream tarball as bz2 on >> the Community OBS anyway due to the debian tools and technology on the >> community OBS what we have. >

Re: [Development] [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 1 de setembro de 2012 00.00.06, Loaden wrote: > And it will support std::thread use win32 thread in the soon. That's completely irrelevant for us because Qt does not use std::thread. Unless someone can tell us that the std::thread implementation provides better support for Windows than

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 16.05.14, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 30.08.2012 18:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > My suggestion on how to proceed is to choose one that offers the following > > or> > > most of the following: > > - most recent GCC (4.7 preferably, 4.6 if not) > > - *working* G

Re: [Development] [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Loaden
2012/8/31 K. Frank > Also, I've had a problem with recent versions of mingw-w64 gdb. It's slow > as molasses loading up and/or initializing an application (minutes), but > once the application starts, it seems to be fine. (I don't think that this > is > Qt specific.) > Because it's using python

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > > Alright, since there are people both in favor of mingw-builds and mingw-64 I > guess we have to do a proper comparison :) > Question to the mingw-64 supporters: Which exact package should we evaluate? > http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/ talks about >

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 30.08.2012 18:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > My suggestion on how to proceed is to choose one that offers the following or > most of the following: > > - most recent GCC (4.7 preferably, 4.6 if not) > - *working* GDB and tested with Creator, with Python support > - large file support, thre

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread kai.koehne
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of ext Thiago Macieira > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:17 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development]

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 Beta Performance

2012-08-31 Thread David Boosalis
Thank you for the reply. IN anser to your questions, I built Qt 5 with no configure options other then prefix and used the samegame found in "Src/Qt/5.0.0-beta1/qtdeclarative/examples/demos/samegame" ldd on the executable reports: ldd ./samegame linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff5cf23000)

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 14.05.51, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 30.08.2012 13:23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > the Qt 5 beta has now been released. Please find all the details at > > > > http://www.qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Beta > > > > and my blog post at > > > > ht

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13.08.39, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > So, I'd say that our position is: stop complaining and upgrade. If you > > can't > > upgrade, there's .gz and you'll pay the penalty by increased disk space in > > your system. > > First: no, that is not true. We will store the u

Re: [Development] Problems with QmlEngine and importPath

2012-08-31 Thread Wehmer, Matthias
Hi Chris, thanks for your interest in our problem. The qmldir file just contains the "plugin..." directive, nothing more. The registerTypes(const char* uri) (and therefore the qmlRegistereTypes)is definitely being called when our plugin is in the default directory, because the plugin works fine

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
> > So, I'd say that our position is: stop complaining and upgrade. If you > can't > upgrade, there's .gz and you'll pay the penalty by increased disk space in > your system. > First: no, that is not true. We will store the upstream tarball as bz2 on the Community OBS anyway due to the debian tool

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 30.08.2012 13:23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Hi everybody, > > the Qt 5 beta has now been released. Please find all the details at > > http://www.qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Beta > > and my blog post at > > http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/08/30/qt-5-beta-is-here/ > > Enjoy! > > Lars > Where shoul

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 31.08.2012 13:54, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13.40.38, Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> On the #qt-release channel, then reviewed through Gerrit. >>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/33837 >> >> This is a little bit "behind closed doors". >> Similar to the decision rel

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13.40.38, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > On the #qt-release channel, then reviewed through Gerrit. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/33837 > > This is a little bit "behind closed doors". > Similar to the decision releasing beta without any note on the list. It was

[Development] Qt5 Regression: WorkerScript cannot import any library

2012-08-31 Thread Baldo Davide
Hi, moving from QtQuick 1.1 to 2.0 i noticed that openDatabaseSync() is no longer available in WorkerScript context and ".import QtQuick.LocalStorage 2.0 as LS" doesn't work either, is there another way to use database within a WorkerScript context? Thanks in advance Davide ps: Documentation of L

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 31.08.2012 13:31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 12.05.00, Laszlo Papp wrote: >>> On my suggestion, we dropped .tar.bz2. We're keeping .tar.gz to ensure >>> maximum >>> compatibility and .tar.xz because it's the smaller of the three. >> >> Was this decision publicl

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 12.05.00, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On my suggestion, we dropped .tar.bz2. We're keeping .tar.gz to ensure > > maximum > > compatibility and .tar.xz because it's the smaller of the three. > > Was this decision publicly discussed on the mailing list (development, >

[Development] Qt Project CI System : Windows 7 machines with some problems

2012-08-31 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, We've found that Windows 7 machines are not up and running at the moment so we've decided to disable them from Qt Project CI system until we can fix them. This means that you might need to be a little bit more careful with what you stage during the weekend since they might introduce some e

[Development] Qt 5 Beta - Qt Location 5.0

2012-08-31 Thread Thomas . Gietlhuber-EXT
Hi, I installed Qt 5 Beta, now I want to work with Qt 5 Location. I'm using Qt Location with QML. import QtLocation 5.0 At the projectfile I added QT += location When I compile the project I don't get an error, because qml will be interpreted by runtime. But Qt Location does not work and i ge

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
> > On my suggestion, we dropped .tar.bz2. We're keeping .tar.gz to ensure > maximum > compatibility and .tar.xz because it's the smaller of the three. > Was this decision publicly discussed on the mailing list (development, release, or both)? Perhaps, it is just me, but I have just skimmed throug

Re: [Development] Idea for automatic widget layout

2012-08-31 Thread jan-arve.saether
Hi Kerrick, Here's my initial impressions. Some comments are related to Qt, since that's where I come from. ext Kerrick Staley wrote on 2012-08-31: > Hello, > > I had an idea for automating widget layout in a framework like Clutter, > Gtk+, or Qt. Imagine you have a row of widgets that are com

Re: [Development] HELP NEEDED: Cleaning up the class documentation for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Michael Hasselmann
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 10:07 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.49.35, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt > wrote: > > Note that for the great majority of the classes this will not be a > > problem, but we won't know for sure until someone has read the > > documentation

Re: [Development] HELP NEEDED: Cleaning up the class documentation for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.49.35, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > Note that for the great majority of the classes this will not be a > problem, but we won't know for sure until someone has read the > documentation and verified this. Can you blog about this, so we can crowd-source

Re: [Development] HELP NEEDED: Cleaning up the class documentation for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
On 08/30/2012 03:44 PM, Gladhorn Frederik (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote: > Great stuff :) > > Jedrzej and I just started running our qdoc bot, similar to the sanity bot. It > will post on commits where we suspect new documentation errors to be > introduces. Let us know when it doesn't work. > Currently it

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Yves Bailly
Le 31/08/2012 09:05, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.00.40, Yves Bailly wrote: >>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\vs10\VC\BIN\cl.EXE' : return code '0x2' >>> Stop. >>> *** qtbase/configure exited with non-zero status. >> >> No more idea about this compiling issue

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Yang Fan
Yes, I was trying make -j option under the msys environment one or two weeks ago, and it gave incompatible path string and broke my building process. My msys was installed through official MinGW installer or from the Git for Windows project, both have the same problem. On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:0

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 31.08.2012 09:00, Yves Bailly wrote: > Hello all, > > Le 30/08/2012 14:33, Yves Bailly a écrit : >> Le 30/08/2012 13:23, lars.kn...@nokia.com a écrit : >>> the Qt 5 beta has now been released. Please find all the details at >>> http://www.qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Beta >>> >> >> Trying to compile

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.00.40, Yves Bailly wrote: > Hello all, > > Le 30/08/2012 14:33, Yves Bailly a écrit : > > Le 30/08/2012 13:23, lars.kn...@nokia.com a écrit : > >> the Qt 5 beta has now been released. Please find all the details at > >> http://www.qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Bet

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-08-31 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Hi, On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Yang Fan wrote: > Currently, official MinGW project provides GCC 4.7, but it uses SJLJ > exception mode when TDM/MinGW-w64/MinGW-build projects use Dwarf2 exception > mode which is known as zero-overhead exception. I forgot to say we now have SEH exception su

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

2012-08-31 Thread Yves Bailly
Hello all, Le 30/08/2012 14:33, Yves Bailly a écrit : > Le 30/08/2012 13:23, lars.kn...@nokia.com a écrit : >> the Qt 5 beta has now been released. Please find all the details at >> http://www.qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Beta >> > > Trying to compile on Windows 7 64bits using MSVC 2010 (32bits compil