Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread lars.knoll
On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:52 PM, ext Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > On 15.8.2012 19.30, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > >> - we simply cannot detract from the 5.0 effort right now. All resources >> need >> to be there, except for 4.8 maintenance. > > +1 > > We are planning to make new 4.8.x patch rele

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Turunen Tuukka
On 15.8.2012 19.30, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > - we simply cannot detract from the 5.0 effort right now. All resources >need >to be there, except for 4.8 maintenance. +1 We are planning to make new 4.8.x patch releases still and fully agree that Qt 4 is a very important platform. Next patch r

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Romain Pokrzywka
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 08:36:35 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 22.05.02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > From wiki: > > > > "QPA on Qt4.8 only makes sense on OpenGL Hardware! If you don?t have > > OpenGL > > HW there is absolutely no point in choosing Qt4.8-

[Development] QtWayland platform themes

2012-08-15 Thread Pier Luigi
Hi, I was running some applications on the qwindow-compositor example and I noticed that no icons are loaded from the icon theme, in fact it's the platform theme plugin not being loaded at all. Looking at QGuiApplication I have seen how loading works: 1. Ask the platform integration for a list o

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 22.05.02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > From wiki: > > "QPA on Qt4.8 only makes sense on OpenGL Hardware! If you don’t have OpenGL > HW there is absolutely no point in choosing Qt4.8-QPA over Qt4.8-QWS" The wiki is wrong. There's a lot of reason for choosing QP

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
15.08.2012, 20:47, "Thiago Macieira" : > On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 19.36.16, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  2. No QWS in Qt 5. >> >>  Porting of QWS-based embedded application requires more effort for porting. >>  For example, in Smartlabs we are using custom graphics plugins for har

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 19.36.16, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 2. No QWS in Qt 5. > > Porting of QWS-based embedded application requires more effort for porting. > For example, in Smartlabs we are using custom graphics plugins for hardware > we are targeting, and our code depends heavi

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 19.36.16, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > I think it's high time for Qt 4.9 to be released. I have my opinion on the existence of a 4.9, but I'll keep it for the moment. But I want to make sure we understand this: *IF* we do a 4.9, it needs to be released *AFTER

Re: [Development] Error building Qt 5 with clang in 32-bit

2012-08-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2012 17.30.51, Olivier Goffart wrote: > CGFloat colorComp[] = { static_cast(textColor.redF()), > static_cast(textColor.greenF()), CGFloat colotComp[] = { CGFloat(textColor.redF()),CGFloat(textColor.greenF()), -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com S

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
> > +1 for QJson stuff. It's a format that is commonly used when parsing > result from an API call. > There is already a QJson project here: http://qjson.sourceforge.net/ > maybe we could use this code as starting point? License is LGPL. I do not have a strong opinion about the 4.9 release idea a

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
15.08.2012, 19:43, "a.gra...@gmail.com" : > Hi, > > On 15 August 2012 18:36, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  Personally I'd like to port next features into Qt 4: >>  * QJson* stuff > > +1 for QJson stuff. It's a format that is commonly used when parsing > result from an API call. > There is alre

Re: [Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread a.gra...@gmail.com
Hi, On 15 August 2012 18:36, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Personally I'd like to port next features into Qt 4: > * QJson* stuff +1 for QJson stuff. It's a format that is commonly used when parsing result from an API call. There is already a QJson project here: http://qjson.sourceforge.net/ maybe

[Development] Proposal: Qt 4.9 release

2012-08-15 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
Hi all, Qt 5 has a number of new features, that could be relatively easy backported into Qt 4 without breaking backward compatibility [1], notably new classes (unrelated to QPA), new methods, and new macros. I think it's high time for Qt 4.9 to be released. Rationale: 1. Large code bases. Th

Re: [Development] Error building Qt 5 with clang in 32-bit

2012-08-15 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 11:20:16 Stephen Chu wrote: > I tried to build Qt 5 (from git) with MacPorts clang 4.7 using > macx-clang-libc++-32 mkspec. It failed with narrowing errors like this: > > styles/qmacstyle_mac.mm:3828:45: error: non-constant-expression cannot > be narrowed from type 'qre

[Development] Error building Qt 5 with clang in 32-bit

2012-08-15 Thread Stephen Chu
I tried to build Qt 5 (from git) with MacPorts clang 4.7 using macx-clang-libc++-32 mkspec. It failed with narrowing errors like this: styles/qmacstyle_mac.mm:3828:45: error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'qreal' (aka 'double') to 'CGFloat' (aka 'float') in initiali

Re: [Development] Scenegraph project in Playground?

2012-08-15 Thread gunnar.sletta
On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:50 AM, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > Hi, > > I have just come across a change on gerrit: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,32778 > > Perhaps, it is just me, but I have not seen the request for this project > going through the mailing list. There is only a post in he

[Development] Scenegraph project in Playground?

2012-08-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I have just come across a change on gerrit: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,32778 Perhaps, it is just me, but I have not seen the request for this project going through the mailing list. There is only a post in here: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/08/01/scene-graph-adaptation-layer/