[Development] How about the future of qbs after Nokia sells Qt to Digia?

2012-08-10 Thread Loaden
I noticed Nokia stop developing qbs for a long time, and qtcreator's wip/qbs seems stop developing too. And for now Nokia sells Qt to Digia, I want know how about the future of qbs? If the Digia give up qbs, I will choice CMake as my build system. So, any news or commens are very welcome! -- Best

Re: [Development] [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia

2012-08-10 Thread Loaden
Best news! +best wishes!! 2012/8/9 Eric Landuyt > Hello , > > seems like a very good news: > > http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/ > > -- > Eric Landuyt, Developer - mailto:e...@datarescue.be > DataRescue sa/nv - http://www.datarescue.com > > ___

Re: [Development] Setting up time-based releases for the project

2012-08-10 Thread joao.abecasis
Sergey Shambir wrote: > I just put it here > GNOME#Past_releases > List_of_Ubuntu_releases#Table_of_versions > > Ubuntu (and other distros) maintainers should have at least one month, > i guess. Once we have our release process in shape, say after a successful 5.0.0 and 5.1.0, we can look at alig

Re: [Development] Setting up time-based releases for the project

2012-08-10 Thread joao.abecasis
Alan Alpert wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:59:28 Abecasis Joao wrote: >> When you mention "destabilizing" changes the truth is most of the >> time we don't know which ones those are. Here, we try to increase >> stability by limiting the type of changes that go into each branch: >> only regressions

Re: [Development] Setting up time-based releases for the project

2012-08-10 Thread joao.abecasis
Charley Bay wrote: > Honest question, this isn't a proposal, but don't we have *TWO* issues > being considered? > > (1)- "Levels-of-stability" (for the next release) > (2)- "Evolving-APIs/Features" (for future releases) > > I don't want to "explode" the issue, but that seems to imply (to me) >

Re: [Development] Setting up time-based releases for the project

2012-08-10 Thread joao.abecasis
Sven Anderson wrote: > On 07.08.2012 13:09, joao.abeca...@nokia.com wrote: >> While the two setups are very similar, almost isomorphs, they're not >> exactly so. There are important practical consequences that >> distinguish the two. >> >>      - Releases happen on a fixed schedule >>      - Minor

Re: [Development] Idea: a qt-project subdomain for QML snippets

2012-08-10 Thread Luís Gabriel Lima
Really great ideia! Cheers, -- Luís Gabriel OpenBossa - INdT On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Mark wrote: > Hi, > > Every once in a while you encounter some nice QML snippet which helps > you out, but will perhaps help others out as well if they just know > where to search for it. So that's wh

[Development] Jira process

2012-08-10 Thread Majid Khan
Hi everyone, I am new to Qt contribution. I am wondering about jira process we use for Qt contribution. I understand that everyone can create tickets but who gets assigned to what ticket? so someone doesn't step on others' feet. Thanks ___ Development m

[Development] Idea: a qt-project subdomain for QML snippets

2012-08-10 Thread Mark
Hi, Every once in a while you encounter some nice QML snippet which helps you out, but will perhaps help others out as well if they just know where to search for it. So that's why i would like to propose the idea of having a subdomain on qt-project.org dedicated to snippets. That will be a central

Re: [Development] Changelog for 5.0 (Was: [Releasing] Content freeze for Qt 4.8.3 approaching)

2012-08-10 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 10/08/2012 01:54, ext Kent Hansen wrote: > On that topic: How should we proceed in preparing the changes file > for 5.0? Should there _be_ a unified changes file for 5.0? (I noticed > that there's no changes-4.0.0 file; guessing that's because the leap > from Qt 3 to 4 was so huge (e.g., in term

Re: [Development] About QML depends on opengl

2012-08-10 Thread Thomas McGuire
Hi, On Friday 10 August 2012 10:56:27 song.7@nokia.com wrote: > >From the code, it seems that QML will depend on the opengl, but is there a > >way to remove such dependency ? > > Because our platform doesn't support opengl yet. It is not possible to remove the OpenGL dependency, the scenegra

[Development] About QML depends on opengl

2012-08-10 Thread song.7.liu
Hi, >From the code, it seems that QML will depend on the opengl, but is there a way >to remove such dependency ? Because our platform doesn't support opengl yet. Thanks, Song ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-proje

Re: [Development] Binary incompatible changes to Qt 4.8

2012-08-10 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, On 05/28/2012 12:47 AM, ext Rohan McGovern wrote: > Turunen Tuukka said: >> >> If feasible, I would like to see both Mac OS X 10.8 and Windows 8 (to the >> extent it is know at that time) working in the 4.8.3 release, as well as >> Ubuntu 12.04. >> >> In addition to making the obvious fixes it