Hi,
I install qt5 using linux installer. When I try to compile a simple
project, I get:
$ qmake
$ make
g++ -Wl,-O1
-Wl,-rpath,/home/leandro/Qt5.0.0beta/Desktop/Qt/5.0.0-beta/gcc/lib
-Wl,-rpath,/home/leandro/qt/ -o project main.o
-L/home/leandro/Qt5.0.0beta/Desktop/Qt/5.0.0-beta/gcc/lib -lQtCore
Thiago Macieira said:
> On quinta-feira, 26 de julho de 2012 13.27.16, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I'll abandon all changes still open in one week. They're cluttering my
> > dashboard.
>
> Uh... André has approved one commit and tried to stage it, but it failed.
> Gerrit claims a conflict.
>
> S
On quinta-feira, 26 de julho de 2012 13.27.16, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'll abandon all changes still open in one week. They're cluttering my
> dashboard.
Uh... André has approved one commit and tried to stage it, but it failed.
Gerrit claims a conflict.
Should be easy to fix...
... except that
Jeremy,
Take a look here:
- https://gitorious.org/cquick#more
- a brain dump spec I am waiting for some free time (god I
need more of that!) to finish,
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2011/wiki/CrowdQuick
I'd be happy if people would join and help me
I have found QML's network transparency very handy for loading whole UIs over
the network, it makes it possible for instance to have "live updates" to an
application provided all the changes happen on the QML side. However, once
internationalization comes into play, there's a catch: unless I'm m
A testcase like the attached one, which sends a mouse event to a QWidget using
QTest::mouseClick, used to adjust QApplication::keyboardModifiers() in Qt4,
but doesn't do so anymore in Qt5.
It seems the code that changes modifier_buttons is now in
QGuiApplicationPrivate::processMouseEvent, which i
On segunda-feira, 30 de julho de 2012 08.54.20, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hope they can agree at some point, so we can start using it. Until then it
> would be great if we could have it as a configure option (off by default).
That depends on what they agree on. If they agree on the GCC team's
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:34 AM, ext Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On domingo, 29 de julho de 2012 10.12.50, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
>>> After changed with _protected_ visibility, that kind of relocation is
>>> reduced, but I still don't know why more R_ARM_RELATIVE relocation
>>> introduced.
>> Ans
On domingo, 29 de julho de 2012 10.12.50, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> > After changed with _protected_ visibility, that kind of relocation is
> > reduced, but I still don't know why more R_ARM_RELATIVE relocation
> > introduced.
> Answer my own question, that is because the loading address of the
