On 6/7/12 8:35 AM, "ext Rohan McGovern" wrote:
>Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
>>
>> > It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
>> > can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
>> > if you need to manage your own build nodes, there
On 6/7/12 12:55 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 21.56.16, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> >https://codereview.qt-project.org/26981-Optimisedeletion
>>
>> I might be wrong (getting tired), but I think this reintroduces the
>> problem with forward declared poin
Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
>
> > It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
> > can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
> > if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is currently no way to
> > integrate with the Qt Proj
On 7.6.2012 1.33, "Rohan McGovern" wrote:
>Sean Harmer said:
>> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> > On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
>> > >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
>> > >most
>> > >sensible way to go in term
> It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
> can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
> if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is currently no way to
> integrate with the Qt Project CI system. Fixing this is a significant
> proj
Hi,
Same issue happened in platform plugins...
Could someone share what's the idea to change qmake or something else ?
Thanks,
Song
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behal
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 21.56.16, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> >https://codereview.qt-project.org/26981-Optimisedeletion
>
> I might be wrong (getting tired), but I think this reintroduces the
> problem with forward declared pointers that the first patch fixes.
It's a different soluti
Sean Harmer said:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
> > >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
> > >most
> > >sensible way to go in terms of maintainability, reducing man-power at
> > >re
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 21.21.28, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > 3) make QProcess use QFile::encodeName for its arguments (no-op right
> >now) 4) make QCoreApplication parse its arguments using QFile::decodeName
> >(no-op>
> > right now)
> >
> > 5) idem for Laszlo's command-line parser
Silence = freedom for me to decide. See below.
On 06/01/2012 04:12 PM, ext Quim Gil wrote:
> (((Posting here to reach module maintainers and humans alike)))
>
> Most Qt Essentials module maintainers will be at the Qt Contributors
> Summit and we want to take this chance to shot video interviews to
On 6/6/12 6:53 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>Cf. thread: Maintainer "TrustMes"
>http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-April/002930.html
>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/2953
>
>I need help again reviewing my own changes. Since I am the maintainer of
>the
>m
On 6/6/12 7:33 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 17.08.29, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> Can't remember that you asked me. I can certainly review them if you
>>don't
>> have anyone else. I'll do so later tonight.
>
>I asked on IRC how you felt about reviewing
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:51:14PM +0200, ext João Abecasis wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > So you're asking that filenames be passed on the locale encoding (say,
> > UTF-8)
> > on the command-line, regardless of what the filesystem encoding is?
>
> I see no other sane way, unless your appli
>> And also, we find that so many feature flags can't be easily disabled
>> for
>> example: QT_NO_DATASTREAM etc., as it seems many codes are not fully
>> controlled on some feature flag. So is that caused as the Qt5 code
>> refine ??
>
> Tasuku Suzuki has been trying to fix the feature system,
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 17.08.29, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> Can't remember that you asked me. I can certainly review them if you don't
> have anyone else. I'll do so later tonight.
I asked on IRC how you felt about reviewing QSharedPointer changes and you
said you'd rather not do i
Hi Csaba,
I was in contact with Lauro earlier and I know his repository. He has
binary only repository for the qtwebkit.
After the alpha release I managed to package all the important modules
of the Qt5.
But now the qtwebkit gives me hard time. Right now I managed to fix
(hack) the code to
Can't remember that you asked me. I can certainly review them if you don't have
anyone else. I'll do so later tonight.
Cheers,
Lars
On 06.06.12 18:54 ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
Cf. thread: Maintainer "TrustMes"
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-April/002930.html
http://l
Cf. thread: Maintainer "TrustMes"
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-April/002930.html
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/2953
I need help again reviewing my own changes. Since I am the maintainer of the
module that the changes are going to, there's no one else t
Hi Zoltan,
I think the guys from Snowshoe might be able to help you with packaging.
CC'ing Lauro, who is packaging QtWebkit trunk and Qt5 weekly for the N9
(Harmattan).
/Andras
On 06/06/2012 03:46 PM, ext Zoltán Balogh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging the Qt5 modules for Ubuntu Precise/Quantal f
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 14.38.46, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using the armcc to compile qt5, there is one Makefile generation issue
> for widgets: You know the widgets is depending on platformsupport static
> library, but the "libQtPlatformSupport.so" is appended into LI
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 16.51.14, João Abecasis wrote:
> > From there, we come to the conclusion that the QString representing such a
> > file name must contain special processing instructions (e.g., one or
> > more special characters). One form of special processing instruction is
> >
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 5 de junho de 2012 16.48.58, João Abecasis wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On terça-feira, 5 de junho de 2012 13.20.36, João Abecasis wrote:
I would not go as far as saying that the concept is broken, but it
definitely isn't portable. One big
Hi,
When using the armcc to compile qt5, there is one Makefile generation issue for
widgets:
You know the widgets is depending on platformsupport static library, but the
"libQtPlatformSupport.so" is appended into LIBS flag within this Makefile.
After checked with the source code of qmake/genera
On 06/06/2012 03:38 PM, ext shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org
>> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org]
>> On Behalf Of Samuel Rødal
>> Sent: 05 June 2012 13:30
>> To
Hi,
I am packaging the Qt5 modules for Ubuntu Precise/Quantal for both x86
and ARM targets:
https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-daily
It is a fun exercise :) as week to week it requires some creativity as
the code base evolves.
Most of the modules build well and their p
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Samuel Rødal
> Sent: 05 June 2012 13:30
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Another late A
On 06/06/2012 08:44, ext Daniel Kreuter wrote:
> jom: C:\Documents and Settings\USER\My
> Documents\Projekt\Qt5MultimediaDemo02\Makefile [release] Error 2
> 08:39:20: Der Prozess "C:\Qt\qtcreator-2.5.0\bin\jom.exe" wurde mit
> dem Rückgabewert 2 beendet.
> Fehler beim Erstellen/Deployment des Proj
Hi,
I have created an online form
(http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/) based on the
list I sent previously
(http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2012-May/000275.html).
The form will send an email with the form data directly to the
releas...@qt-project.org mailing
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
> >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
> >most
> >sensible way to go in terms of maintainability, reducing man-power at
> >release
> >time and preventing i
On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 June 2012 13:22:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
>> > What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
>>
>> The major target is that, at release time, you'
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 13:22:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
> > What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
>
> The major target is that, at release time, you're able to confidently say
> that this platform is
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
> What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
The major target is that, at release time, you're able to confidently say that
this platform is working properly and all the showstopper issues (as judged by
the re
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.54.16, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:03:46AM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Yeah, I broke it yesterday somehow creating a topic branch. I got a
> > database error when pushing and let Matias know immediately, but I guess
> > he
Hi list,
We have been working hard to improve Qt support on the QNX platform. At this
stage we have good support for widgets and QtQuick 1 & 2, and sensors.
The next stage is to promote QNX to a Tier 1 platform so that users understand
that QNX is a fully supported platform for Qt.
To do so we
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:03:46AM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Yeah, I broke it yesterday somehow creating a topic branch. I got a database
> error when pushing and let Matias know immediately, but I guess he had
> already
> left for the day.
>
we run periodic prunes, which matches the
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 09.23.47, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> Not sure about the PCRE, but now I am trying the regx disabling, if it's
> impossible or big efforts I will keep this feature in for my minimal-build.
>
> And also, we find that so many feature flags can't be easily disable
Not sure about the PCRE, but now I am trying the regx disabling, if it's
impossible or big efforts I will keep this feature in for my minimal-build.
And also, we find that so many feature flags can't be easily disabled for
example: QT_NO_DATASTREAM etc., as it seems many codes are not fully cont
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 08.44.22, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> Yes, we are creating a super minimal build with basic functionalities...
> But is there some feature depending on the REGEXP in case if it's disabled
> other features don't work then.
There's probably nothing out there dep
Yes, we are creating a super minimal build with basic functionalities...
But is there some feature depending on the REGEXP in case if it's disabled
other features don't work then.
Thanks,
Song
-Original Message-
From: ext Giuseppe D'Angelo [mailto:dange...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
Hi,
On 6 June 2012 02:42, wrote:
> We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ?
it does not exactly work out of the box, but with little effort you
should be able to define QT_NO_REGEXP (to avoid compiling
QRegularExpression) and remove the PCRE inclusion from too
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> The alpha package is too old. Can you retry with a recent Git version and let
> us know if the problem still happens?
>
The fail should be caused by the "space" in the path: "C:\Documents
and Settings\USER\My..."
__
Ok, thanks... A few minutes ago I also tried to remove this declaration, it
works now.
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
ext Thiago Macieira
Sent: Wednesday, June
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 08.44.00, Daniel Kreuter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I try to compile an Qt5 example I get the following error:
>
> jom: C:\Documents and Settings\USER\My
> Documents\Projekt\Qt5MultimediaDemo02\Makefile [release] Error 2
> 08:39:20: Der Prozess "C:\Qt\qtcreator-2.5
You should go to qt-interest or qt-project.org/forums
This list is for developing Qt instead of developing with Qt.
Debao
2012/6/5 Daniel Kreuter :
> Hello,
>
> when I try to compile an Qt5 example I get the following error:
>
> jom: C:\Documents and Settings\USER\My
> Documents\Projekt\Qt5Multi
On terça-feira, 5 de junho de 2012 16.59.41, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Hi CI team/Gerrit team,
> Pushes to gerrit are failing (qtbase).
>
> girish@beast:~/Qt/qt5/qtbase$ git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master
> Counting objects: 12, done.
> Delta compression using up to 6 threads.
> Compressing ob
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 06.27.06, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> L94: Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO(QNetworkHeadersPrivate::RawHeaderPair,
> Q_MOVABLE_TYPE);
>
> And the above code indicates that QList (L4) will firstly use
> the QTypeInfo, which is declared in last code L94. So it
> seems an erro
46 matches
Mail list logo
