On May 22, 2012, at 11:01 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> And I don't think they very much liked the idea of spinning while trying to
> acquire a lock (consumes power)... at least we have a call to
> QThread::yieldCurrentThread(), though it would be interesting to see what
> happens if we repl
>> New Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere that supports OpenGL +
>> v8.
The ne slogan cannot be worse. :-)
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+samuel.li=spx@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+samuel.li=spx@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
d3fault
Sent
Helmut said:
> Some days ago I wrote:
> > a few days after the alpha release of qt5 the git version (with git pull
> > qt5; perl init-repository -f) stopped to compile with Visual Studio 2010.
> > Compiling qqmlopenmetaobject.cpp results in this error:
> > d:\qt\qt5\qtdeclarative\include\qtqml\5.0
Hey Lars,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:45 AM, wrote:
> On 5/22/12 11:39 AM, "ext Uwe Rathmann" wrote:
>>If I had a wish for Qt5 I would vote for a solution how to use widgets
>>and components in the same application.
>
> Currently this is possible, but only within different top level windows.
>
On 22.05.2012 21:44, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 20.52.47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Does anybody know if it is possible to use Qt (at lease QtCore)
>> on FreeRTOS, http://www.freertos.org/
>>
>> Qt runs on QNX, but does this mean it would also run on FreeRTOS?
>> Or is
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 20.52.47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Does anybody know if it is possible to use Qt (at lease QtCore)
> on FreeRTOS, http://www.freertos.org/
>
> Qt runs on QNX, but does this mean it would also run on FreeRTOS?
> Or is QNX a completely different game?
Hi Peter
I don'
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Does anybody know if it is possible to use Qt (at lease QtCore)
> on FreeRTOS, http://www.freertos.org/
>
> Qt runs on QNX, but does this mean it would also run on FreeRTOS?
> Or is QNX a completely different game?
QNX is not FreeRTOS, so tha
Does anybody know if it is possible to use Qt (at lease QtCore)
on FreeRTOS, http://www.freertos.org/
Qt runs on QNX, but does this mean it would also run on FreeRTOS?
Or is QNX a completely different game?
Peter
___
Development mailing list
Development
Hi
QMatrix4x4 is still qreal, which is still target depend? Is there any
intention to change that?
Best regards, Marco
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
I want to ask a question. What's about c++ backend to QML? As i can see here,
http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16465/ people want it. No just because
they are c++ fanboys (we all love c++, i think) and not because it is faster
(it certainly is), but because some things can be implemented
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:44:36PM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 11.16.31, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> > > It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> > > re
Qt 4.8.2 will be available trough maintenance tool later. It will most likely
be released with Qt SDK 1.2.2 update. Currently we are waiting for the final
fixes for the mobile targets.
Simo
From: development-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org
[de
On Tuesday 22 May 2012 07:08:34 Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> Folks:
>
> There's been a lot of discussion recently regarding whether
> or not Qt functions (specifically, interlocking functions)
> should be declared "inline" or not.
>
> But in fact, isn't this much ado about nothing? If I
> un
Hi,
With Corentin's permission, I have pushed a rebased and slightly
polished version of the patch up to
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,26797 for everyone to play
around. The build instructions are inside the class documentation of
QWindowsEGLContext.
Angle can also be built with q
Hi,
Gerrit (https://codereview.qt-project.org/) will be unavailable while we deploy
a fix.
When:
Thursday May 24 - 09:00 - 0930 CEST
JIRA issue fixed:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-382
Regards
--
Matias Rand
___
Development mai
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 07.08.34, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> But in fact, isn't this much ado about nothing? If I
> understand current compiler technology, when one declares
> a function "inline", that's nothing more than a hint to
> the compiler. (At least at high optimization sett
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 11.16.31, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> > It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> > renaming our tools.
> >
> > What do we gain from keeping the same name for all
Hi
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Iikka Eklund wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Qt and Qt Commercial 4.8.2 have been released today – check out the official
> comms at:
>
>
> http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2012/05/22/qt-4-8-2-and-visual-studio-add-in-1-1-11-released/
>
> http://www.digia.com/en/Blogs/Qt-blog/A
Hi all,
Qt and Qt Commercial 4.8.2 have been released today -- check out the
official comms at:
http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2012/05/22/qt-4-8-2-and-visual-studio-add-in-1-1-11-released/
http://www.digia.com/en/Blogs/Qt-blog/Akseli-Salovaara/Dates/2012/5/Presenting-Qt-Commercial-482-and-Visual-
Folks:
There's been a lot of discussion recently regarding whether
or not Qt functions (specifically, interlocking functions)
should be declared "inline" or not.
But in fact, isn't this much ado about nothing? If I
understand current compiler technology, when one declares
a function "
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 13.33.22, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least.
> > And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I
> > know.
>
> How can we fix this issue ? What is the workflow for nominating n
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 09.59.42, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Honglei has so far been the maintainer for QtSql and QtXmlPatterns. He is
> now leaving Nokia to start some studies and has told me that he can't
> continue to maintain the modules.
>
> I've been looking ar
Some days ago I wrote:
> a few days after the alpha release of qt5 the git version (with git pull qt5;
> perl init-repository -f) stopped to compile with Visual Studio 2010.
> Compiling qqmlopenmetaobject.cpp results in this error:
> d:\qt\qt5\qtdeclarative\include\qtqml\5.0.0\qtqml\private\../../
Hi,
> I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least.
> And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I
> know.
How can we fix this issue ? What is the workflow for nominating new
contributors for this role ? Something similar as for approvals ? Are
the
> I'm probably being quite naïve here, but I don't think that it's
> impossible to have a nice set of QtQuick desktop components by the time
> that Qt5 is released (even if as an add-on).
I think, you can have simple applications built on top of, as for the
time being. Unfortunately, it is not yet
Hi everybody,
Honglei has so far been the maintainer for QtSql and QtXmlPatterns. He is
now leaving Nokia to start some studies and has told me that he can't
continue to maintain the modules.
I've been looking around for two new maintainers for these modules and
found two people that I'd like to
On 05/22/2012 12:39 PM, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> While Qt4 widgets were a full replacement of Qt3 widgets it is not clear
> when - or if ever - Qt components will be able to supersede widgets on
> all platforms.
I'm probably being quite naïve here, but I don't think that it's
impossible to have a n
On 5/22/12 11:39 AM, "ext Uwe Rathmann" wrote:
>On 05/22/2012 10:53 AM, d3fault wrote:
>
>> Old Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere.
>
>I'm afraid the options will be: code twice or to deploy not everywhere.
>
>While Qt4 widgets were a full replacement of Qt3 widgets it is not clear
On 05/22/2012 10:53 AM, d3fault wrote:
> Old Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere.
I'm afraid the options will be: code twice or to deploy not everywhere.
While Qt4 widgets were a full replacement of Qt3 widgets it is not clear
when - or if ever - Qt components will be able to supe
But,,, I am building my Qt5 in Linux server. :(
Thanks,
Song
From: development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+song.7.liu=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
ext Loaden
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:31 PM
To: Thiago Macieira
Cc: development@qt-project.
It's only related with Windows. It's should be qmake's problem / issue.
Hope to be fixed before the release coming.
2012/5/22 Thiago Macieira
> > I am building the Qt5, but could somebody point out what's the possible
> > cause of: Project WARNING: QtGui cannot have a QT of gui
>
--
Please d
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> renaming our tools.
> What do we gain from keeping the same name for all our tools across
> major versions?
>
we don't complicate our own release process
On 05/22/2012 10:53 AM, ext d3fault wrote:
> I think we need a slogan change so as not to lie to our users.
>
> Old Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere.
> New Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere that supports OpenGL +
> v8.
>
> The reasons are self-explanatory.
> The
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 07.12.26, bradley.hug...@nokia.com wrote:
> So far, we've got 3 votes for de-inlining: Thiago, Lars, and myself. For the
> few cases where inlining matters, we can inline inside Qt at those
> locations (QMetaObject::activate() would be the first place to check).
Op 22-5-2012 10:53, d3fault schreef:
> I think we need a slogan change so as not to lie to our users.
Could you please stop trolling now? This is not constructive anymore.
Your comments have been heard, judging by the amount of people who
responded in your many topics in this list, the forum and
I'd appreciate if you could stop your ranting on the mailing list.
I believe most people here are happy to participate in constructive
discussions but your rants will not achieve anything.
Lars
On 5/22/12 10:53 AM, "ext d3fault" wrote:
>I think we need a slogan change so as not to lie to our u
I think we need a slogan change so as not to lie to our users.
Old Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere.
New Slogan: Code Once. Create More. Deploy Everywhere that supports OpenGL + v8.
The reasons are self-explanatory.
The v8 part might only be true for the 5.0.0 release... but it a
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 07.32.41, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building the Qt5, but could somebody point out what's the possible
> cause of: Project WARNING: QtGui cannot have a QT of gui
>?
>
> Any information is appreciated ;)
Please keep Qt 5 development discussion
Op 21-5-2012 22:56, Purdy, Edgar schreef:
Are there any examples on line for implementing the qt chart
widget?I need to implement 15 charts on a single panel.
I think you should ask your question in the inter...@qt-project.org
mailinglist instead. This ML is about developing Qt *itself*
On May 21, 2012, at 2:58 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 21 de maio de 2012 08.34.32, bradley.hug...@nokia.com wrote:
>> On May 18, 2012, at 8:34 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Recommendations (priority):
>>>
>>> (P0) de-inline QBasicMutex locking functions until we solve
40 matches
Mail list logo
