It has always supported it. It's just not used that much.
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 5/11/12 3:50 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
AFAIK, Installing with INSTALL_ROOT is known not to work with Qt5's
"modular" projects.
BTW, does windows even support make install? Has it started supported
it these
AFAIK, Installing with INSTALL_ROOT is known not to work with Qt5's
"modular" projects.
BTW, does windows even support make install? Has it started supported
it these days?
Girish
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Loaden wrote:
> Not work for "nmake install INSTALL_ROOT=...", missed 'qba' header
Not work for "nmake install INSTALL_ROOT=...", missed 'qba' headers in
QtGui.
> progressmanager_win.cpp
> Header is deprecated. Please include
> instead.
> ..\..\..\..\Qt5\qtbase\include\QtGui\QPlatformNativeInterface(8) : fatal
> error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'qpa/qplatformnativeinterf
On quinta-feira, 10 de maio de 2012 20.17.34, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> If we really want to remove that overhead the better option would probably
> be to only compile the files that need it with exceptions enabled.
That's a task for the NextBuildSystem™.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira
On Thursday 10 May 2012 20:17:34 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 5/10/12 5:13 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote:
> >There is also QtConcrrent which is not part of QtCore anymore and has
> >some
> >exception handling possibilities.
>
> At least currently it doesn't use any try/catch statements.
L
On 5/10/12 5:13 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>On Thursday 10 May 2012 07:10:51 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> On 5/10/12 4:20 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On quarta-feira, 9 de maio de 2012 21.39.53, lars.kn...@nokia.com
>>wrote:
>> >> How about this then?
>> >>
>> >> https:/
On Thursday 10 May 2012 07:10:51 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 5/10/12 4:20 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
>
> wrote:
> >On quarta-feira, 9 de maio de 2012 21.39.53, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> >> How about this then?
> >>
> >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,25788
> >>
> >> https://c
https://bugreports.qt-project.org is correct for bugs in Qt.
The link you followed is for reporting bugs on the codereview tool itself.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@q
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:21 AM, wrote:
> On 5/10/12 5:59 AM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
> wrote:
>
>>Hi Lars,
>>The current API appears to make modifications to values instead of the
>>document itself. This makes it quite cumbersome to modify a document.
>>For example, to change the value
Qt Community,
At https://codereview.qt-project.org I notice a link, "Report Bug", in
the lower right corner. When I click on this link it takes me to:
http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/list
Instead of where I originally reported my bug report:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org
These don't
Hi Carl,
We moved to using gerrit code review for patches instead of merge requests.
You'll need to register at https://codereview.qt-project.org and accept a
contribution license agreement before you can push changes.
Instructions are at http://wiki.qt-project.org/Setting_up_Gerrit and
http://
On Thursday 10 May 2012 07:49:25 Carl Schumann wrote:
> Qt Community,
>
> On 8 May 2012 I submitted a bug report:
>
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-25691
>
> I have a proposed fix which I am trying to submit. I used the
> following documentation in my attempt:
> http://wiki.qt
Filed: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-25718
It's good news if there ever was XSettings integration. I'll see what I can
write, or possibly other Razor devs.
Thanks again.
J. Leclanche
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 11:54:45
Qt Community,
On 8 May 2012 I submitted a bug report:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-25691
I have a proposed fix which I am trying to submit. I used the
following documentation in my attempt:
http://wiki.qt-project.org/Git_Introduction
I am now to the point in the above docum
On Thursday 10 May 2012 11:54:45 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Pier Luigi
wrote:
> > 2012/5/10 Jerome Leclanche :
> > > Morning
> > >
> > > Qt currently does not properly support icon themes on Linux. This is a
> >
> > big
> >
> > > issue here for Razor [1] as we're
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Pier Luigi wrote:
> 2012/5/10 Jerome Leclanche :
> > Morning
> >
> > Qt currently does not properly support icon themes on Linux. This is a
> big
> > issue here for Razor [1] as we're a non-KDE-based DE trying to use pure
> > Qt. QIcon::fromTheme has some heuristic
On 5/10/12 10:47 AM, "ext Joerg Bornemann"
wrote:
>On 09/05/2012 09:45, ext Andreas Holzammer wrote:
>
>> I was hitting qtxmlpatterns not compiling, because Exceptions are not
>> enabled by default for Windows CE. My guess is that this was done for
>> performance and or security reasons.
>
>We've
On 09/05/2012 09:45, ext Andreas Holzammer wrote:
> I was hitting qtxmlpatterns not compiling, because Exceptions are not
> enabled by default for Windows CE. My guess is that this was done for
> performance and or security reasons.
We've disabled exceptions for the Windows CE port to reduce the
2012/5/10 Jerome Leclanche :
> Morning
>
> Qt currently does not properly support icon themes on Linux. This is a big
> issue here for Razor [1] as we're a non-KDE-based DE trying to use pure
> Qt. QIcon::fromTheme has some heuristics for KDE and Gnome, but other DEs
> are not supported. [2]
> We'd
On 5/10/12 5:59 AM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
wrote:
>Hi Lars,
>The current API appears to make modifications to values instead of the
>document itself. This makes it quite cumbersome to modify a document.
>For example, to change the value of 5 to 10 in the json "[1, 2, [3, 4,
>[5, 6]]]", one has
On 5/10/12 4:20 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On quarta-feira, 9 de maio de 2012 21.39.53, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> How about this then?
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,25788
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,25787
>
>Yes, something like that. I'm not sur
21 matches
Mail list logo
