Re: [Development] Found a serious issue about windows position (Qt5 master)

For now the position is auto move to top again and again when storing / restoring geometry. I hit this bug! 2012/4/18 Loaden > Why this bug is still Not Evaluated ? > The bug still exist in current master, but better than before. > > 2012/3/21 Samuel Rødal > >> On 03/21/2012 02:31 AM, ext Loa

Re: [Development] Found a serious issue about windows position (Qt5 master)

Why this bug is still Not Evaluated ? The bug still exist in current master, but better than before. 2012/3/21 Samuel Rødal > On 03/21/2012 02:31 AM, ext Loaden wrote: > > Hi, all, In currently, I can't visit bugreports in qt-project.org > > , so I don't know whether this

Re: [Development] api_changes merged back to master

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:52 AM, wrote: > Hi everybody, > > the merge of api_changes back into master for qtbase finally made it's way > through the CI system. I'm currently in the process of merging declarative > back and Kent is staging all the changes required to fix compilation of > the other

Re: [Development] api_changes merged back to master

yetch, and again, sorry Kent Were I but a beautiful woman, I would lend you a hug to give you the power to put this turkey down, once and for all. KO On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:36 PM, wrote: > Hi, > The qtdeclarative merge (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,23550) > still hasn't gone t

Re: [Development] api_changes merged back to master

Hi, The qtdeclarative merge (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,23550) still hasn't gone through; tests are crashing in the latest attempt. Modules that depend on qtdeclarative won't be able to merge any changes until the above merge is completed. Kent __

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 15.37.35, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > Yes, it does. > And for the case of QPA, we have said that we don't want to promise BC, but > we haven't said that we will go around breaking SC for every patch release. > (And we shouldn't, since SC breakage uses q

Re: [Development] api changes

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 15.02.22, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > >The access to screen() and display() may indicate a missing Qt API, which > >we > >may be able to add. If the X11 dependency was intentional, it can be > >ported to > >QPlatformNativeInterface, to obtain the XCB pointers.

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

Yes, it does. And for the case of QPA, we have said that we don't want to promise BC, but we haven't said that we will go around breaking SC for every patch release. (And we shouldn't, since SC breakage uses quite a bit of resources on all parties, so avoid them if you can.) Like some others, I

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 15:05:49 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > Well, that breaks SC for existing projects, which have been ok with the > missing BC. So you want to improve by promising BC by breaking SC? _p also means SC is not maintained. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly | Software Enginee

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

> -Original Message- > From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [mailto:gir...@forwardbias.in] > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:03 AM, wrote: > > On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > >>> As per the previous discuss, I rena

Re: [Development] api changes

On 4/17/12 1:15 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 21.31.52, Fredrik Höglund wrote: >> On Monday 16 April 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> > On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.02.21, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> > > Can you point me to it? Does it contain a eq

[Development] api_changes merged back to master

Hi everybody, the merge of api_changes back into master for qtbase finally made it's way through the CI system. I'm currently in the process of merging declarative back and Kent is staging all the changes required to fix compilation of the other modules. >From now on most changes should go to mas

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

Hi Marius, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:03 AM, wrote: > On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >>> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with >>> a couple of helper scripts >> >> I just added the fo

Re: [Development] QPlatformInputContext needs more informations

On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 09:23 -0700, ext BogDan wrote: > > From: Pekka Vuorela > > To: BogDan > > Cc: Samuel Rødal ; "development@qt-project.org" > > > > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 12:57 PM > > Subject: Re: [Development] QPlatformInputContext needs more informations > > > > On Mon, 2012-04-16

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

Hi Paul, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a >> couple of helper scripts > > I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: > > I do n

[Development] Removing the \compat QDoc command

Hi, We have multiple commands to mark documentation content as outdated: \deprecated, \obsolete and \compat. \compat was used for Qt3 compatibility. There are only 12 occurrences of \compat under qt5.git in the documentation, but none of that documentation actually gets printed. So please change t

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 10.34.33, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > I do not agree with this change. We have made a difference between public > API and plugin API, and this is different from private implementation > detail. And during the previous discussion, I questioned that difference. No o

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 07.41.26, jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > > > 1. qtestlib ends up exposing qpa api and thus testcases might end up > > > being binary incompatible - This should be fixed in > > > > AFAIK qtestlib

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 12.02.00, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 17 April 2012 08:59, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > By not salting the hash for integer. > > Or only doing it before applying the % > > Or specialize some QHash / QHashNode member for int key and re-xoring > with the seed? Th

[Development] Fwd: Re: [Interest] QtArg

Nice report. Most are expected changes. The one in QChar is a silent breakage, but documented in the changelog (in fact, it's the first one now): * drop a bogus QChar::NoCategory enum value; the proper QChar::Other_NotAssigned value is returned for an unassigned codepoints now. -- For

[Development] Qt addons in gerrit - separate namespace or not?

Simple question, do we want the qt/ namespace to be for essentials only, or also for addons. e.g. should the path to an addon be: ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtftp or ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qtaddon/qtftp There are currently addons in qt/ and qt-labs/ but these were cre

Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project: Desktop Components

On 04/17/2012 01:36 PM, morten.sor...@nokia.com wrote: > Desktop Compoents are not going to be a part of the Qt 5.0 release, but we'd > still like to get it up to speed and open up for contributions through gerrit. > > Task: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-501 What mailing lis

Re: [Development] Browsing the Qt Playground project repositories online

Meaning you can now find the playground projects here: http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground :) -- .marius On 17/04/2012 05:00, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > FTR: No mentionings, but Ossi has already fixed this issue.:-) Thanks for > that! > > Best Regards, > Laszlo Papp > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with >> a couple of helper scripts > > I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: > > I do not agree with this

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

On 17 April 2012 08:59, Olivier Goffart wrote: > By not salting the hash for integer. > Or only doing it before applying the % Or specialize some QHash / QHashNode member for int key and re-xoring with the seed? But I can't say I'm familiar with that code and will have no time to do that asap --

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:59:57AM +0200, ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Sunday 15 April 2012 20:38:22 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.08.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > I'm just not really happy with the fact that you removed the optimisation > > > for int to

[Development] Request for a new playground project: Desktop Components

Desktop Compoents are not going to be a part of the Qt 5.0 release, but we'd still like to get it up to speed and open up for contributions through gerrit. Task: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-501 Morten ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+janne.anttila=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+janne.anttila=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: 17. huhtikuuta 2012 12:44 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] M

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

On 4/17/12 9:59 AM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote: >On Sunday 15 April 2012 20:38:22 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.08.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: >> > On Saturday 14 April 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> > > So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash rand

Re: [Development] Browsing the Qt Playground project repositories online

FTR: No mentionings, but Ossi has already fixed this issue. :-) Thanks for that! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice to have an option for checking out Qt Playground > projects from the web browsers. As far as I see, the only wa

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:34 AM, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a >> couple of helper scripts > > I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: > > I do not a

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:15:17AM +0200, ext Andreas Holzammer wrote: > Am 17.04.2012 10:32, schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen: > > integrate it into qmake, so it is able to produce self-contained > > makefiles which don't need messing with the environment. > > And where should the mapping between sdk a

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

Am 17.04.2012 10:32, schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:23:20AM +, ext Anttila Janne wrote: >> So is it ok to move checksdk to qtbase repo and src\tools folder? Or do you >> have better ideas for building it? >> > rather than just moving it around, you should do the right

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with a > couple of helper scripts I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: I do not agree with this change. We have made a difference between public API an

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:23:20AM +, ext Anttila Janne wrote: > So is it ok to move checksdk to qtbase repo and src\tools folder? Or do you > have better ideas for building it? > rather than just moving it around, you should do the right thing and integrate it into qmake, so it is able to pr

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

Hi Janne, I was also thinking about this, I think its a good idea. The Checksdk seems to have a bug, but while we are at it we can fix that. Its also a problem how we add mappings betweeen mkspec and the actual sdk, which resides in setcepaths.bat, as there are almost no standard SDKs for WEC7, ma

Re: [Development] qHash / QHash changes

On Sunday 15 April 2012 20:38:22 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.08.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Saturday 14 April 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > > So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash randomization was merged a > > > few hours ago! > > > > >

Re: [Development] Moving checksdk.exe to qtbase repo

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 05:23:20 Anttila Janne wrote: > Hi, > > I started building Qt5 for WinCE and WEC7, and found that checksdk is not > currently build by configure and it has been moved to QtTools repo. > Checksdk.exe is an utility to read WinCE environment from Visual Studio > configuration

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan > wrote: > > 1. qtestlib ends up exposing qpa api and thus testcases might end up > > being binary incompatible - This should be fixed in > > AFAIK qtestlib doesn't promise binary compatibility (see e.g. > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtqa/comm