Hello, All !
I have developed crossplatform application under Qt, but strange error
was arises. Sometimes I received message Debug Assertion failed
dbgheap.c 1279 Expression _CrtIsValidHeapPointer(pUserData), when
application work under Windows XP, under linux all works fine. Because
Qt examples u
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> QtQuick 1 is not. Perhaps the iOS port could start with the QPA enabled Qt
> 4.8?
Until Apple changes iOS terms, which I personally highly doubt it's
going to happen any time soon, we will have to stay with QtQuick1
only, for iOS. So, no Scene
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:04:39 ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 15 de abril de 2012 08.32.54, Hai Phaikawl wrote:
> > Again, how would the "v8 on iOS" problem be solved? Falling back to the
> > good old Qt4 js intepreter??
> > QtQuick not being able on iPhone or iPad is a big loss.
>
> There
jason.mcdon...@nokia.com said:
> > Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how
> > often those insignificant tests actually fail? That should help to
> > figure out which ones are actually working, and therefore should not
> > be marked as insignificant.
>
> I'm glad you aske
On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.08.43, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Saturday 14 April 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash randomization was merged a
> > few hours ago!
> >
> > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/c01eaa438200edc9a3bbcd8ae
On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 01.33.31, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > The only applications that should do that are the workspace fixture ones:
> > kwin and plasma.
>
> Yes, those are the ones that were brought up, together with the
> KWindowSystem class. Apart from those I don't think KDE uses
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 20:03:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.59.51, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 15, 2012 19:32:46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > Can you point me to it? Does it contain a equivalent
> > > > API to QX11Info (the removal of this cl
On Saturday 14 April 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash randomization was merged a
> few hours ago!
>
> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/c01eaa438200edc9a3bbcd8ae1e8ded058
> bea268
>
> Thanks to all of the guys involved for the ideas, feedba
On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.44.22, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Static and shared in one build has never been supported.
>
> But you want to make it supported in one package? Has that been possible
> before?
Not right now. It's extremely unlikely we'll modify qmake to support it. But
this
On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.59.51, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Sunday, April 15, 2012 19:32:46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Can you point me to it? Does it contain a equivalent
> > > API to QX11Info (the removal of this class is a problem for KDE which
> > > doesn't have a solution yet).
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 19:32:46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Can you point me to it? Does it contain a equivalent
> > API to QX11Info (the removal of this class is a problem for KDE which
> > doesn't have a solution yet).
>
> KDE needs to be ported away from it anyway. It cannot depend on X11
> s
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 19:30:55 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 15 de abril de 2012 23.59.55, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Friday, April 13, 2012 13:55:04 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > 4) Packagers who package only one type of Qt build (shared or
> > > > static,
> > > > but
> > > > not both
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 18:49:34 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 4/12/12 5:06 PM, "ext Oswald Buddenhagen"
>
> wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +0200, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> I'd like to see another model attempted next time, like all commits
> >> going to master, and a 'st
On domingo, 15 de abril de 2012 23.59.55, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, April 13, 2012 13:55:04 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > 4) Packagers who package only one type of Qt build (shared or static,
> > > but
> > > not both), should not see any changes either. One Qt build means a set
> > > of
> >
On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.02.21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, April 13, 2012 19:48:49 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > ie. we have a QtX11/QtMac/QtWinSupport add-ons. That's also a natural
> > place to add feature gaps to Qt 4.x such as QX11Embed into.
>
> There's a QtX11 add-on?
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash randomization was merged a
> few hours ago!
>
> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/c01eaa438200edc9a3bbcd8ae1e8ded058
> bea268
>
> Thanks to all of the guys involved for the ideas, feed
On Friday, April 13, 2012 19:48:49 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> ie. we have a QtX11/QtMac/QtWinSupport add-ons. That's also a natural
> place to add feature gaps to Qt 4.x such as QX11Embed into.
There's a QtX11 add-on? Can you point me to it? Does it contain a equivalent
API to QX11Info (the re
On Friday, April 13, 2012 13:55:04 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > 4) Packagers who package only one type of Qt build (shared or static,
> > but
> > not both), should not see any changes either. One Qt build means a set
> > of
> > library files and the headers (e.g.: libQtCore.so and qconfig.h).
>
> TH
Hi Lars + Thiago,
let me continue in a new thread:
On 04/15/2012 12:58 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> Look at the definition of a Qt add-on. I think that might fit nicely
fo Qwt.
> In any case, if you want your library do live under the qt-project
> umbrella we can most likely find a solu
> Who is the third party in that case?
The third party at http://qt.nokia.com/forms/summit-signup is Nokia. Sorry for
not being more explicit in the first place.
--
Quim
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.or
On domingo, 15 de abril de 2012 12.35.08, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> my interest is of course to benefit as much as possible from the ideas
> and solutions of the Qt development
> and I believe the best way should be to organize my code and build
> environment like Qt libraries do.
>
> So
On 4/15/12 12:35 PM, "ext Uwe Rathmann" wrote:
>Hi Thiago,
>
>my interest is of course to benefit as much as possible from the ideas
>and solutions of the Qt development
>and I believe the best way should be to organize my code and build
>environment like Qt libraries do.
>
>So please let me chec
Hi Thiago,
my interest is of course to benefit as much as possible from the ideas
and solutions of the Qt development
and I believe the best way should be to organize my code and build
environment like Qt libraries do.
So please let me check your list what might be possible for Qwt:
> 1) where
23 matches
Mail list logo
