Thank you marius!
You are right. The incorrect environment variable "QTDIR", which pointed to
Qt4 directory, led to my Qt5 compilation problems. The build completed
successfully after redirecting "QTDIR" to the Qt5 qtbase folder.
Cheers!
YANG Hao
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:03 PM, wrote:
> Are y
All I can say is that we know WebKit is not yet building on Windows, and
it might take some time before we get there. Right now there's virtually
no resources available for handling QtWebKit on Windows, unless someone
feels it's time they learn some webkit buildsystem stuff for Windows :)
--
.
Build Command:
> cmd /C "cd qtwebkit && perl Tools\Scripts\build-webkit --qt *--v8*--release
> --no-webkit2 --makeargs=-nologo >>..\webkit.log 2>&1"
>
Any comments?
> cd Source\WTF\ && D:\qpSOFT\DEVx86\bin\nmake.exe -f Makefile.WTF
> (set QMAKEPATH=D:\qpSOFT\Projects\Qt5\qtwebkit\Tools\qmake
Hi All,
I was building Qt5 alpha on Mac OS X 10.6.7, and getting the following
errors:
g++ -c -pipe -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -O2 -arch x86_64 -fvisibility=hidden
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -fPIC -DQT_NO_LIBUDEV -DQT_NO_EVDEV
-DQT_NO_XCB -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_PLUGIN -DQT_QML_LIB -DQT_XMLPA
On 04/06/2012 06:01 AM, Hausmann Simon (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote:
> I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to
> WebKit committers that are contributors to the Qt port.
>
> Quim, what do you think?
Sure, this is what I meant when I wrote
> Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, wrote:
> I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit
> committers that are contributors to the Qt port.
>
> Quim, what do you think?
>
I second that as well, I also want to make sure how we can include
folks out of the Necessitas projec
IMO that's reasonable. They are an equal part of the Qt community as
anybody else, since it benefits Qt directly.
--
.marius
On 04/06/2012 08:01 AM, ext simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote:
> I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit
> committers that are contributors t
I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit
committers that are contributors to the Qt port.
Quim, what do you think?
Simon
--
Sendt fra min Nokia N904.04.12 19:51 skrev Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley):
Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of do
I believe that Simon is the module maintainer in Qt Project sense.
Kenneth
From: development-bounces+kenneth.r.christiansen=nokia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+kenneth.r.christiansen=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf
of Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconVall
Are you sure your environment is clean, that you have no paths (in PATH,
LIBS, INCLUDES) which points to previous/older builds of Qt? Qt5 repo,
Qt4, SDKs etc?
Which perl are you using? ActiveState, MinGW, Cygwin, Strawberry? If
it's Cygwin, it's likely that it's not munging something in syncqt
Thank you techabc,
Adding "-platform win32-msvc2010" doesn't solve. The warnings given by the
configuration step (no matter whether adding the "-platform" option) are:
==
Qt is now configured for building. Just run nmake.
To reconfigure, run nmake confclean and
11 matches
Mail list logo
