Re: [Development] Flickable and boundsBehavior

2012-04-03 Thread martin.jones
Hi, That's Flickable.AutoFlickDirection messing with you. If you don't set the flickableDirection explicitly, Flickable tries to work out which directions you want to be able to flick. Generally, it's what you'd want, but if it's not then set flickableDirection explicitly and it will work as

Re: [Development] Issues with dynamically loading of Qt libraries (libQtNetwork and libQtWebKit)

2012-04-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 3 de abril de 2012 15.12.41, Miroslav Ristic wrote: > Our main concern is not the segfault, but the fact that we can't unload the > Qt libraries using dlclose. > > Any question, advice, or feedback is highly appreciated. Unloading libraries is always a recipe for disaster. You can'

[Development] Issues with dynamically loading of Qt libraries (libQtNetwork and libQtWebKit)

2012-04-03 Thread Miroslav Ristic
Hello Qt developers, A bit of background: Due to a limited amount of RAM on our embedded platform and lack of multiprocess support in directFB 1.0, we are forced to load Qt libraries dynamically with dlopen / dlclose calls. Using this approach, we should be able to have Qt libraries loaded only wh

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 3 de abril de 2012 21.47.10, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan > > wrote: > > Window desktop components still don't exist but Widgets work just fine > > with Qt5 just like in Qt4. > > They are in the works right? The project still exists

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-04-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 3 de abril de 2012 20.10.08, shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: > Ok, there are three options I can see and we need to choose one. > > 1. One add-on for each removed API (e.g. qftp.git, qhttp.git) > 2. One add-on for each module (e.g. qt4network.git) > 3. A catch-all kitchen sink rep

[Development] Flickable and boundsBehavior

2012-04-03 Thread Rafael Brandao
Hello there, Recently I've came to this strange behavior when the boundsBehavior is set to DragAndOvershootBounds: if the size of an axis of the inner content is strictly equals to the size of the flickable area axis, then it won't drag outside the boundary and overshoot as the behavior suggests.

Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!

2012-04-03 Thread Sivan Greenberg
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > this event is for you. Plus, you don't want to evening treat in the > form of super cool Qt social activity in the evening. Ah...I typed too fast.. Of course I meant you *do not* want to miss the evening treat! ;) Sorry for the extra noise

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-04-03 Thread shane.kearns
Ok, there are three options I can see and we need to choose one. 1. One add-on for each removed API (e.g. qftp.git, qhttp.git) 2. One add-on for each module (e.g. qt4network.git) 3. A catch-all kitchen sink repository (e.g. qt4support.git) We promised this when removing the APIs, and again in the

[Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!

2012-04-03 Thread Sivan Greenberg
Hello Everybody! Now that we have a successful Qt5 Alpha release, we have a complementary event to celebrate it, the wonderful Qt Contributors' Summit. If you want to influence where Qt is headed, and engage in fruit full, yet fun sessions and discussions about the future of Qt, this event is fo

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread lorn.potter
On 04/04/2012, at 4:47 AM, ext Sivan Greenberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan > wrote: >> Window desktop components still don't exist but Widgets work just fine >> with Qt5 just like in Qt4. > > They are in the works right? > >> >> Symbian is no longer supported

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread Robin Burchell
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > I'd be surprised greatly if the Next Billion transition platform is no > longer supported in Qt5, surely an announcement mistake? no mistake, and this is not a new announcement - I'm fairly sure this was made clear in QtCS 2011 when most of

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread a.gra...@gmail.com
Hi, On 3 April 2012 18:14, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > Symbian is no longer supported in Qt5. what?!?! -- Andrea Grandi - Nokia Qt Ambassador Ubuntu Member: https://launchpad.net/~andreagrandi website: http://www.andreagrandi.it ___ Development mail

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread Sivan Greenberg
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > Window desktop components still don't exist but Widgets work just fine > with Qt5 just like in Qt4. They are in the works right? > > Symbian is no longer supported in Qt5. I'd be surprised greatly if the Next Billion transition platfo

Re: [Development] Why Qt5 master don't generate pch docs?

2012-04-03 Thread Alan Ezust
The instructions in the qt5/qtdoc/README are not sufficient to build them either. You need qttools to be built and installed, which is not mentioned at all in the README. 2012/3/19 Loaden : > Hi, I am not sure it is or not is a bug? > But after build Qt5 master, I fond in docs folder, not have any

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread Girish Ramakrishnan
Hi Jason, On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jason H wrote: > I was worried this would be a Duke Nukem Forever situation, I'm glad to see > its not! :-) > > But last I checked there were many holes, like Windows desktop components, > etc. It seems that Sybmian was very supported and the desktops were

[Development] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-03 Thread marius.storm-olsen
Hi, We are happy to announce the Qt 5.0 alpha release. This is the first major Qt release since the Qt Project went live, and a large amount of work and features have gone into this release. Blog post: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/04/03/qt-5-alpha/ Download page: http://qt-project.org/wik

Re: [Development] Meaning of Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE?

2012-04-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 3 de abril de 2012 10.20.11, Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday April 3 2012, jedrzej.nowa...@nokia.com wrote: > [...] > > > > Also, QVarLengthArray should zero-initialise, but it doesn't. > > > > I like this feature it allows to avoid double initialization in some > > cases, > >

Re: [Development] Meaning of Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE?

2012-04-03 Thread Marc Mutz
Hi, On Tuesday April 3 2012, jedrzej.nowa...@nokia.com wrote: [...] > > Also, QVarLengthArray should zero-initialise, but it doesn't. > > I like this feature it allows to avoid double initialization in some cases, > but maybe it is not the most intuitive behavior. Anyway it is a bit out of > scope

Re: [Development] Meaning of Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE?

2012-04-03 Thread jedrzej.nowacki
Hi, > How about this one: > QVarLengthArray array(1); > array[0] |= 0x80; This is a bit different because you can expect from users that they know about POD and in general about variable initialization in C++. QFlags, QUuid have default constructor, int hasn't. > Also, QVarLengthArray should z

Re: [Development] Meaning of Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE?

2012-04-03 Thread jedrzej.nowacki
Hi, > The problem is that users are not usually aware whether a class is > primitive or not. And with Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE they have no way to check if a class is primitive or not, moreover it may be changed by us even in a minor releases. How bad it is? Cheers, Jędrek ___

[Development] Find a way to build/install all target on Windows

2012-04-03 Thread Loaden
Hi, All! I found a way can build and install all target (include debug and release) on Windows, just modify qtbase/mkspecs/qconfig.pri after configure is done. Change this: > CONFIG+= debug shared > To: > CONFIG+= debug *build_all* shared Then run: > nmake qmake && nmake && nmake install INSTAL