Op 2-4-2012 1:02, joao.abeca...@nokia.com schreef:
Hello again,
To every-concerned-one-of-you, I hope you do realize that we share all
of those same concerns. We do! :-)
I really enjoyed this joke. Thanks! :-D
André
___
Development mailing list
Dev
Hi,
>> At this point, I'm either looking for an alternative to V8
>
> This is more of an follow-up question for the list than a reply:
>
> QtDeclarative includes the V4 javascript interpreter that (as far as I know)
> can
> handle simple javascript expressions. How far can you get with V4
Hello again,
To every-concerned-one-of-you, I hope you do realize that we share all
of those same concerns. We do! :-)
So, let's make Qt 5 the best it can be under the constraints set out by
the previous incantations of Qt and the tone set by our Chief
Maintainer.
If you still have concerns or j
On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, benedikte.h...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Kelly
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I can help out, but only until the end of today I'm afraid.
> > > >
> > > Right, this is my clue
On 04/01/2012 06:04 PM, joao.abeca...@nokia.com wrote:
> The first one introduces a Q namespace, which replaces the Q prefix in
> Qt5. The second patch drops the prefix in class names. This brings the
> C++ API more in line with the QML/JavaScript one and will hopefully help
> move all remaining C+
I have 4 comments on these changes, and they're all negative. But first,
I THANK YOU for of enormous changes in support of Qt's future use. I
just feel that now is not the time, and have a few other points to make:
(1) dropping the prefix letter in class names, IMO, would need to have
the conve
> On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Kelly
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I can help out, but only until the end of today I'm afraid.
> > >
> > Right, this is my clue that this is indeed an April 1st day joke.
> >
>
> Oh gods -- I've been had
On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >
> > I can help out, but only until the end of today I'm afraid.
> >
> Right, this is my clue that this is indeed an April 1st day joke.
>
Oh gods -- I've been had for the straight man,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> I can help out, but only until the end of today I'm afraid.
>
Right, this is my clue that this is indeed an April 1st day joke.
-Sivan
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, wrote:
> > The first one introduces a Q namespace, which replaces the Q prefix in
> > Qt5. The second patch drops the prefix in class names. This brings the
> > C++ API more in line with the QML/JavaScript one a
On Sunday 01 April 2012 Apr, joao.abeca...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Earlier today I pushed some changes to Gerrit, Thiago suggested I bring
> it up on the mailing list before he can approve them. Given the impact
> these changes have on user code it's important that we get this merged
> to m
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 15:04:34 joao.abeca...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Earlier today I pushed some changes to Gerrit, Thiago suggested I bring
> it up on the mailing list before he can approve them. Given the impact
> these changes have on user code it's important that we get this merged
2012/4/1 :
> Hi all,
>
> Earlier today I pushed some changes to Gerrit, Thiago suggested I bring
> it up on the mailing list before he can approve them. Given the impact
> these changes have on user code it's important that we get this merged
> to master and out in the alpha as quickly as possible
Hey Joao,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, wrote:
> The first one introduces a Q namespace, which replaces the Q prefix in
> Qt5. The second patch drops the prefix in class names. This brings the
> C++ API more in line with the QML/JavaScript one and will hopefully help
> move all remaining C++ d
Hi all,
Earlier today I pushed some changes to Gerrit, Thiago suggested I bring
it up on the mailing list before he can approve them. Given the impact
these changes have on user code it's important that we get this merged
to master and out in the alpha as quickly as possible.
For reference the ch
On sábado, 31 de março de 2012 19.02.32, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > If I can, I try to make sure that each commit is testable on its own.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, I will sacrifice testing for atomic changes. I don't like having
> > big changes doing lots of things because it's hard to understand how
16 matches
Mail list logo