Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi QtWebKit team,
> is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the
Correction, I meant 'Since there is no QtWebKit 2.3 planned...'
Girish
___
Development mailing list
Hi QtWebKit team,
What's the best way to deal with patches to QtWebKit1/qt4 (for
example, http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,21292) ?
Is the strategy still to get it all upstream? Since, I assume, there
is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the
answer that it won't ev
On sexta-feira, 30 de março de 2012 18.41.46, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012 12:23:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Use of QVarLengthArray should *only* be done with primitive types, the
> > fixes applied to it during Qt 4.x lifetime notwithstanding. So the user
> > must know that be
On Friday 30 March 2012 12:23:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Use of QVarLengthArray should *only* be done with primitive types, the fixes
> applied to it during Qt 4.x lifetime notwithstanding. So the user must know
> that before he uses that class. If he's not sure, use QVector.
That is wrong. QV
On sexta-feira, 30 de março de 2012 17.00.15, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Thursday, March 29, 2012 23:31:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > We really need the topic branch reviewing feature back in. It's no fun
> > staging 19, 20, 20 and 21 changes...
>
> Did you consider staging them a few commits at a t
On sexta-feira, 30 de março de 2012 16.54.09, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> Then the only real problem I see is:
>
> QVarLengthArray array;
> array.resize(1);
>
> currently this is always true:
> array.at(0).isNull() == QUuid().isNull()
>
> with new definition it may be something else. It is not big dea
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 23:31:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> We really need the topic branch reviewing feature back in. It's no fun
> staging 19, 20, 20 and 21 changes...
Did you consider staging them a few commits at a time?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Kelly | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) G
On Friday 30. March 2012 13.54.06 ext Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Friday March 30 2012, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28. March 2012 15.37.46 ext Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Over at http://codereview.qt-project.org/21518, we're discussing
> > > whether QUuid is Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE or o
+2 ;-)
Cheers,
Lars
On 3/30/12 2:41 PM, "ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com"
wrote:
>+1, and first!
>
>--
>.marius
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt-
>> project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm-
>> olsen=nokia@qt-projec
On Mar 30, 2012, at 2:54 PM, ext Ian wrote:
At this point, I'm either looking for an alternative to V8
This is more of an follow-up question for the list than a reply:
QtDeclarative includes the V4 javascript interpreter that (as far as I know)
can handle simple javascript expressions. How far
+1, and first!
--
.marius
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt-
> project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm-
> olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Robin Burchell
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 7:30 AM
> To: development@
Hi all,
I'd like to nominate peppe for approver status.
For those of you who haven't run across his work already, peppe has
been doing a myriad of things in qtbase, some of the biggest examples
being the new QRegularExpression class in Qt 5 (wrapping PCRE), along
with the requirements work and be
On Friday March 30 2012, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Wednesday 28. March 2012 15.37.46 ext Marc Mutz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Over at http://codereview.qt-project.org/21518, we're discussing whether
> > QUuid is Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE or only Q_MOVABLE_TYPE.
> >
> > The documentation of Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO
Apologies for the repost, wrong subject used.
>This[1] is not the ABI that is used?
>
>[1]
>http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Xcode/Conceptual/iPhoneOSABIReference/iPhoneOSABIReference.pdf
I have enough information about the ABI to know that it's similar to (but not
the same a
>This[1] is not the ABI that is used?
>
>[1]
>http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Xcode/Conceptual/iPhoneOSABIReference/iPhoneOSABIReference.pdf
I have enough information about the ABI to know that it's similar to (but not
the same as) EABI (IIRC IOSABI uses an additional registe
On 03/30/2012 02:24 PM, Ian wrote:
> There is another (possibly even bigger) issue in the ARM BI used by Apple on
> iOS.
> It's not EABI (which AFAIK V8 on ARM is written for), and it's not even
> documented AFAIK, so even though it's similar to EABI (from what I've seen so
> far), it's not the
Hi all,
The first tentative steps for getting iOS support into Qt5 have been made (
really it's only a few small patches to get the build working - there's nothing
it could be used for yet). There's a possible issue with running any Javascript
interpreter on iOS (IIRC one of the App Store rules
On Wednesday 28. March 2012 15.37.46 ext Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over at http://codereview.qt-project.org/21518, we're discussing whether
> QUuid is Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE or only Q_MOVABLE_TYPE.
>
> The documentation of Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO says Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE means the
> type is a POD, without con
>
> We *really* need the topic branch reviewing feature back in. It's no fun
> staging 19, 20, 20 and 21 changes...
>
We've fixed some of the problems with the topic branch feature and I'd
like to enable it [1] again after our next release (hopefully next week
or the week after).
After that, I'
19 matches
Mail list logo
