Hi,
A few weeks ago we requested a playground repository to do experiments
with the non-widgets classes that are now in QtWidgets, but are useful
for application development using QtQuick2. More details in this
thread:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-February/002150.html
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 3/15/12 8:13 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
>2012/3/15 Thiago Macieira :
>> No one has objected. Can someone remove the deprecation marks in
>>QPointer,
>> please?
>
>Pushed to http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,20203 :-)
And staged :)
Cheers,
Lars
___
2012/3/15 Thiago Macieira :
> No one has objected. Can someone remove the deprecation marks in QPointer,
> please?
Pushed to http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,20203 :-)
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-projec
On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 15.00.19, Hugo Parente Lima wrote:
> > Also, how about support for multiple values for an option, separated by
> > ','? gcc -Wl,--defsym,__stack_limit=0x7ffe'
> > Probably an ultra-corner case?
>
> I believe this is, as you said, a ultra corner case. but it'
On Thursday 15 March 2012 15:38:39 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Upon agreement with QtCore maintainer Thiago, a cli_parser branch has
> > been created for QtBase, with Submit rights for Laszlo and anyone added
> > to his Gerrit group "CLI Parser".
>
> Yeah, I will put some code in there soon f
Hey,
> Upon agreement with QtCore maintainer Thiago, a cli_parser branch has
> been created for QtBase, with Submit rights for Laszlo and anyone added
> to his Gerrit group "CLI Parser".
Yeah, I will put some code in there soon from this KDE Scratch repository:
http://quickgit.kde.org/index.php?p
On sexta-feira, 2 de março de 2012 10.27.56, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> QPointer was ported to a QWeakPointer backend and deprecated early in Qt 5
> history. However, QPointer is used throughout our code and, I can expect, in
> user code too. Replacing it with QWeakPointer is just monkey wo
On 15/03/2012 08:33, ext Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:27PM +, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:
>> I'm not saying that it cannot be provided for Qt. I'm saying there
>> are many opinions on how an argument parser should work, so do it
>> in an Addon first. Then it doesn't m
On Thursday 15 March 2012 12:17:41 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 15/03/2012 08:32, ext Hugo Parente Lima wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 March 2012 09:23:27 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> >> The applications I mentioned are "bastards" when it comes to
> >> commands/actions/options, and
On 03/09/2012 12:36 AM, ext Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I would like to experiment with a command line parser in Qt
> Playground. The topic and the use case were more or less discussed
> previously on the qt5-feedback mailing list around last October.
Btw, the libqxt project (http://dev.libqxt.org/libqxt
On 15/03/2012 08:32, ext Hugo Parente Lima wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2012 09:23:27 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
>> The applications I mentioned are "bastards" when it comes to
>> commands/actions/options, and I mentioned them on purpose to facilitate
>> discussion. They don't represent v
Just a reminder:
any Qt 4.8 fixes that are relevant to Qt 5 should go into Qt 5 first, before
they go into Qt 4.8.
Exceptions are fixes that are not relevant for 5.0 or are already fixed there.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology
We are happy to announce the Qt Creator 2.5.0 beta release. This is a preview
of the new minor version of Qt Creator, including bugs fixes as well as a bunch
of new features.
Blog post: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/03/15/qt-creator-2-5-beta/
Download page: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt_Creator_
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:27PM +, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:
> I'm not saying that it cannot be provided for Qt. I'm saying there are
> many opinions on how an argument parser should work, so do it in an
> Addon first. Then it doesn't matter so much if not everyone agrees. It
> might be h
On Thursday 15 March 2012 09:23:27 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 15/03/2012 04:53, ext David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 12 March 2012 20:06:22 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> >> Anyways, something to keep in mind when working on your
> >> implementation. It's a can of worms with a
On Thursday 15 March 2012 08:26:14 kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org
> > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On
> > Behalf Of ext Hugo Parente Lima
> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2
On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 14.24.25, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > I only checked the tests file, but it seems like you're going for the GNU
> > style where options following '-' are always one character letters.The Qt
> > tools itself do not follow this style, e.g. qmake -project, not qmake
> >
> I only checked the tests file, but it seems like you're going for the GNU
> style where
> options following '-' are always one character letters.The Qt tools itself do
> not follow this style, e.g. qmake -project, not qmake --project, or qmake -p
> :) To use the parser also internally , it sho
On 15/03/2012 04:53, ext David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2012 20:06:22 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
>> Anyways, something to keep in mind when working on your
>> implementation. It's a can of worms with a lot of bikeshedding ;)
>
> Yes, this has been said a few times already. However
On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 07.20.09, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> > -Werror should never be enabled on non-developer builds.
>
> Why not? Is the plan to ship code that contains
> warnings?*
Qt should be always built with -Wall -Wextra, plus maybe one or two non-
standard warnings (candida
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:53:59AM +0100, ext David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2012 20:06:22 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> > c) The parser only focuses on the "standard" for a single platform.
> > (Linux users will not go for Windows style /? options, and Windows users
> > won't ac
> > -Werror should never be enabled on non-developer builds.
>
> Why not? Is the plan to ship code that contains warnings?*
That is not the _plan_. But the plan is also not to jump through
hoops to silence bogus warnings, and the plan is also not to
purchase crystal balls to predict what the n
I would like an argument parser in Qt, and I'd like it to be in qtbase.
The reason for qtbase is so that our own tools and manual tests can use it.
Manual tests outside of qtbase are normally GUI based.
I think this is something that can go into a minor 5.x release.
About windows:
Tools that use
Robin:
> Because those non-developers aren't developing Qt,
> and may not have the capability to fix warnings,
> if they arise. They just want to build Qt and use it.
So you don't want their bug reports when
their particular configuration (that the
Qt developers may not have tested) doesn't
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Atlant Schmidt
wrote:
> Thiago:
>
>> -Werror should never be enabled on non-developer builds.
>
> Why not? Is the plan to ship code that contains
> warnings?*
Because those non-developers aren't developing Qt, and may not have
the capability to fix warnings, if
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of ext Hugo Parente Lima
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:16 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Cc: Mark Constable
> Su
Thiago:
> -Werror should never be enabled on non-developer builds.
Why not? Is the plan to ship code that contains
warnings?*
This is the sort of thing that destroyed Symbian.
When I last counted, the Symbian build routinely
produced more than 7,000 warnings. No one at Nokia
besides
On Thursday 15 March 2012 07:29:23 Mark Constable wrote:
> Any simple standard cli args parser included with Qt would be
> overwhelmingly better than none at all even if it's just -s shortops (/s
> for win) and worry about --longopts and tar-like variations for Qt6+. The
> simpler the better as lon
Any simple standard cli args parser included with Qt would be overwhelmingly
better than none at all even if it's just -s shortops (/s for win) and worry
about --longopts and tar-like variations for Qt6+. The simpler the better as
long as it's universally available in qtcore, if possible, sooner th
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM, David Faure wrote:
> Look at GNU getopt: same issue, it can't be used by tar. So what?
I think the "so what" about sums up my feelings on this too. It's
possible to bikeshed to the ends of the earth on pretty much any
topic, but this isn't useful to anyone, and d
On Monday 12 March 2012 20:06:22 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
> a) The parser is too trivial and doesn't handle the normal levels of
> complexity of command line arguments out there. (tar, find, zip, and
> standard Qt (built-in) arguments anyone?)
Who needs to reimplement tar, zip, or fin
> >Torsdag 1. mars 2012 19.48.15 skrev ext Alan Alpert:
> > Perhaps we could just add an enum to MouseArea? EventType { MouseEvents,
> > TouchEvents, MouseAndTouchEvents (default) }. That allow you more
> > fine-grained control, with identical default behavior that doesn't require
> > event synthes
On 03/15/2012 04:15 AM, Jones Martin (Nokia-MP/Brisbane) wrote:
> Sure, if you don't touch the flag you don't break anything, but as soon as
> someone uses the flag somewhere in a hierarchy of interactive Items you're
> going to have problems. It's too late for 5.0.
We are already having proble
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:07:56AM +1000, ext Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:56 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > qmake does not add a dependency on the .a file, so the other target doesn't
> > get
> > relinked.
>
> Qtopia had a large number of .a files and this hit us hard so we devis
On 03/15/2012 05:59 AM, ext jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to nominate Kurt Korbatits for approver status. Kurt worked on
> Qtopia, Qt and Qt Mobility from 2005 to 2010 and rejoined Nokia's
> Brisbane team in late 2011. Since then he has been working on improving
> the state of
On 03/14/2012 11:32 PM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>
> That is exactly what's done for ARM, it should be fine to do it for MIPS
> too. http://codereview.qt-project.org/20033 does this.
>
thanks rohan!
PS: I have not tried building Qt for SH4 but I assume we run into similar
issues there.
_
On 5.3.2012 18.21, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:24:04PM +, ext Salovaara Akseli wrote:
>> At the moment we are following content of
>> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commits/4.8 branch on our internal
>> repository. We would like to provide Qt 4.8.1 branch on
>> Gi
38 matches
Mail list logo
