Hello all,
Over the past several months QtQA have been trying to increase and stabilize
the test configurations for Qt 5.0. The effort had been broken down into Qt
modules on a per platform basis. This process recently hit a milestone with the
enforcing of autotests for three more Qt 5.0 platfo
jason.mcdon...@nokia.com said:
> All,
>
> I'd like to nominate Kurt Korbatits for approver status. Kurt worked on
> Qtopia, Qt and Qt Mobility from 2005 to 2010 and rejoined Nokia's Brisbane
> team in late 2011. Since then he has been working on improving the state of
> Qt's autotests with a
All,
I'd like to nominate Kurt Korbatits for approver status. Kurt worked on
Qtopia, Qt and Qt Mobility from 2005 to 2010 and rejoined Nokia's Brisbane team
in late 2011. Since then he has been working on improving the state of Qt's
autotests with a particular focus on getting the tests worki
Sure, if you don't touch the flag you don't break anything, but as soon as
someone uses the flag somewhere in a hierarchy of interactive Items you're
going to have problems. It's too late for 5.0.
Br,
Martin.
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+martin.jones=nokia@qt-pr
>Torsdag 1. mars 2012 19.48.15 skrev ext Alan Alpert:
> Perhaps we could just add an enum to MouseArea? EventType { MouseEvents,
> TouchEvents, MouseAndTouchEvents (default) }. That allow you more
> fine-grained control, with identical default behavior that doesn't require
> event synthesis that me
On quarta-feira, 14 de março de 2012 23.55.06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 08.32.43, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> > You did approve the change which enables it, though
> > 7e970eb58c71dc08981575c648a04d258dbf0684, I mean.
> > Do you think this test should now only be en
On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 08.32.43, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> You did approve the change which enables it, though
> 7e970eb58c71dc08981575c648a04d258dbf0684, I mean.
> Do you think this test should now only be enabled on developer builds?
> IMHO that goes against the intent that the real h
Thiago Macieira said:
> On quarta-feira, 14 de março de 2012 21.37.23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > >Possible options:
> > >a.) fix the underlying warning (probably very tough for alpha one)
> > >b.) remove -Wcast-align from the headersclean.pri for the alpha one?
> > >c.) don't mind
On quarta-feira, 14 de março de 2012 21.37.23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> >Possible options:
> > a.) fix the underlying warning (probably very tough for alpha one)
> > b.) remove -Wcast-align from the headersclean.pri for the alpha one?
> > c.) don't mind that qtbase does not compile
On 3/14/12 10:33 PM, "ext Holger Hans Peter Freyther"
wrote:
>On 03/14/2012 10:26 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>
>>>
>>> tests/auto/other/headersclean
>
>> Only if someone provides a patch. I won't stop the alpha because of a
>> header file warning.
>
>it is a build breakage of the above test
On 03/14/2012 10:26 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> tests/auto/other/headersclean
> Only if someone provides a patch. I won't stop the alpha because of a
> header file warning.
it is a build breakage of the above test (the .pri file adds various -W* flags
to the compilation, e.g. -Wcast-al
On 3/14/12 9:12 PM, "ext Holger Hans Peter Freyther"
wrote:
>On 03/07/2012 05:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On quarta-feira, 7 de março de 2012 19.36.17, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>>> Thanks, so can we use #pragma GCC diagnostic to selectively silence
>>> warnings like this? There doesn't seem to
On 03/07/2012 05:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 7 de março de 2012 19.36.17, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>> Thanks, so can we use #pragma GCC diagnostic to selectively silence
>> warnings like this? There doesn't seem to be much precedent for it so
>> far (just one usage I can find in
2012/3/14 Salovaara Akseli :
> We have now finalized the testing for 4.8.1 release, please tag the 4.8.1
> release for the sha1.
I'd suggest holding off on that and including
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,19692. Or tagging a 4.8.1.1
if you have already done it.
That's a pretty serious
Hi,
the qt-at-spi bridge enables accessibility via screen readers for Qt
applications on Linux.
I'm happy to release the Qt AT-SPI bridge 0.2.0 into the world. Based on some
user feedback I could fix a few things. It's also nice to note that the Qt 5
version of the bridge is up to date and wor
Hi Denis,
It looks like the plugins are only built for debug mode.
In qtbase/plugins/platform, there are only windowsd5.* files, and not the
windows5.* files for release mode.
This problem is repeated through the other plugin directories.
The missing plugins can be built by running “nmake releas
Hi All,
We have now finalized the testing for 4.8.1 release, please tag the 4.8.1
release for the sha1.
Qt 4.8.1 sha1 == 1e0021d8d9e374ae3959fcd4eac5d9e7238cbc54
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commit/1e0021d8d9e374ae3959fcd4eac5d9e7238cbc54
Enclosed, please find the final changes file of 4.8.1 r
On 03/14/2012 09:05 AM, ext eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2012, at 14:14, ext morten.sor...@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:25 PM, ext Johannes Zellner wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/08/2012 09:21 PM, ext Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
uikit:
There was no development of the
But if I'm trying to build Qt as follows: set QTDIR=h:\Qt\build-vs2010x32-5.0\qtbaseset PATH=%QTDIR%\bin;%PATH% h:\qt\qt5\configure ^-debug-and-release ^-platform win32-msvc2010-opensource ^-nomake examples ^-nomake demos ^--no-webkit And if then I run a simple GUI application: QT+=widgets #include
On 12 Mar 2012, at 14:14, ext morten.sor...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:25 PM, ext Johannes Zellner wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2012 09:21 PM, ext Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>> uikit:
>>> There was no development of the plugin in Qt5.
>> Is anybode using them on Qt5? or even tri
Hello,
Who is updating this wiki http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Alpha?
I just checked the QtPim Addon and the documentation is present in the
modules seperately:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/5.0-snapshot/qtorganizer-overview.html
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/5.0-snapshot/qtcontacts-overview.html
http://do
On 03/14/2012 12:30 AM, ext Pier Luigi wrote:
> 2012/3/8 Holger Hans Peter Freyther:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the alpha is getting closer and we still have some QPA platform plugins that
>> don't compile and I wonder what we should do with them? Polish and remove for
>> Qt5 Alpha, leave it in and hope someone
22 matches
Mail list logo
