Re: [Development] QTBUG-23489: Implement the new regular expression classes using PCRE

2012-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 3 de março de 2012 05.17.37, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > NB: Since PCRE landed in *master*, there's the need of a merge before > staging these ones, but I didn't do it just yet (I don't even think I > can push merges). Lars has promised to do that this weekend. -- Thiago Macieira - thiag

Re: [Development] QTBUG-23489: Implement the new regular expression classes using PCRE

2012-03-02 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 22 February 2012 17:11, wrote: > Hi, > > this is the first mail where I'd like to go through the remaining features > for Qt 5.0. > > I know that this bug is blocked by not having PCRE in 3rdparty/. But how > is the status apart from this? Thiago, simply tell me if you feel > comfortable with

Re: [Development] QDoc can't ignore Q_PROPERTY

2012-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 2 de março de 2012 18.01.15, Denis Shienkov wrote: > The fact is that if the names of class methods and the same properties names > - then QDoc ignores the description for the methods. That's intentional. You document the property. The getter and setter methods do not need to be do

Re: [Development] Undeprecating QPointer

2012-03-02 Thread Marc Mutz
On Friday March 2 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello > > QPointer was ported to a QWeakPointer backend and deprecated early in Qt 5 > history. However, QPointer is used throughout our code and, I can expect, > in user code too. Replacing it with QWeakPointer is just monkey work, > adding .data()

[Development] QDoc can't ignore Q_PROPERTY

2012-03-02 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi all. Is it possible to ignore the macro Q_PROPERTY when generating documentation QDoc? If I add *.qdocconf .. Cpp.ignoretokens += \ Q_PROPERTY .. or .. Cpp.ignoredirectives += \ Q_PROPERTY .. it has no effect. The fact is that if the names of class methods and the same properties na

Re: [Development] Undeprecating QPointer

2012-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 2 de março de 2012 12.20.05, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > I'd like to suggest we un-deprecate it and bring it back to full status. > > I agree. Anyone objects? > I have been trying to compile qtbase without the deprecated symbols, and two > issues remains that i could not solve: QPo

Re: [Development] Undeprecating QPointer

2012-03-02 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Friday 02 March 2012 10:27:56 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello > > QPointer was ported to a QWeakPointer backend and deprecated early in Qt 5 > history. However, QPointer is used throughout our code and, I can expect, in > user code too. Replacing it with QWeakPointer is just monkey work, adding

[Development] Undeprecating QPointer

2012-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello QPointer was ported to a QWeakPointer backend and deprecated early in Qt 5 history. However, QPointer is used throughout our code and, I can expect, in user code too. Replacing it with QWeakPointer is just monkey work, adding .data() everywhere and buying us no better safety (because no one