On 14.2.2012 12.45, "Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>On Monday 13 February 2012 12:28:06 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We would like to release next version of Qt Commercial 4.8 around
>>mid-March.
>>
>> It would be really great if we can again sync the LGPL and Commercial
>> releases both i
For some time we have wanted to unify the behavior of qreal on desktop and
embedded. Currently, qreal is defined to be double on desktop and to a float on
embedded.
The reasons for unifying are:
- Using "double" is pure waste for a lot of use cases. QRectF, QPointF,
QPainter, QPolygonF, Open
On 02/14/2012 08:22 PM, Koehne Kai (Nokia-MP/Berlin) wrote:
> Here's another idea:
>
> // in qlogging.h
> void qMessageLogEnabled(const char *area)
> #define QMessageArea(area) if (qMessageLogEnabled(area))
> QMessageLogger(__FILE__, __LINE__, Q_FUNC_INFO, area)
>
> Usage would be e.g.
>
> QMessag
On 02/15/2012 01:47 AM, ext BRM wrote:
> I'd much rather see a Category object being pushed via operator<<()
> instead so that it can be detected and allow things like:
>
> // assume QMessageLoggerCategory(category) is a class
> qDebug() << QMessageLoggerCategory("category1")<< "message for
> cate
On 02/14/2012 08:22 PM, Koehne Kai (Nokia-MP/Berlin) wrote:
> Just wanted to point out that there are variadic macros
I'm aware of this but last time I checked, they weren't in the C++
standard. It seems they're new to C99 and C++11. Grepping over the Qt 5
sources reveals no variadic macros in Q
On terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2012 17.51.33, shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote:
> When using the low level (QTcpSocket) API, you are dealing with a stream.
> Intuitively, you would expect the stream applies flow control and rate
> limiting by itself. If using native apis (either synchronous or
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> 2012/2/14 Mark :
> > Could someone please patch this in Qt (4.8.x as well?).. I don't have an
> > account for review/commit stuff. Feel free to commit :)
>
> I'd strongly suggest you just set yourself up to do it. Then you get
>
Hi Mark,
2012/2/14 Mark :
> Could someone please patch this in Qt (4.8.x as well?).. I don't have an
> account for review/commit stuff. Feel free to commit :)
I'd strongly suggest you just set yourself up to do it. Then you get
all of the credit (and all of the blame...) and you're ready to submi
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:03 PM, wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 12:03 AM, ext Mark wrote:
> > While using Qt's elidedText function
> http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/qfontmetricsf.html#elidedText i
> noticed the function was dog slow. For just 1000 entries (each 250 chars)
> el
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: 13 February 2012 19:27
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Def
Hello everyone,
This is to give a heads up that file engines in their current incantation are
being removed from public API for Qt 5. This is to happen Real Soon Now (tm):
http://codereview.qt-project.org/15236
There's a pending change to remove the internal function QFile::fileEngine:
> From: "kai.koe...@nokia.com"
> To: bm_witn...@yahoo.com; development@qt-project.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:31 AM
> Subject: RE: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.or
Hi,
(CCing the list so there's a record of this in future)
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Friedemann Kleint
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are currently looking at the autotests on Windows and noticed that the
> file watcher autotest has become unstable.
> In the test removeFileAndUnWatch():
>
> QVERIFY(
Hi Mark,
On Feb 14, 2012, at 12:03 AM, ext Mark wrote:
> While using Qt's elidedText function
> http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/qfontmetricsf.html#elidedText i
> noticed the function was dog slow. For just 1000 entries (each 250 chars)
> eliding them to 200px took about 190ms on window
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of ext BRM
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:00 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] QLog ( Work
On terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2012 15.03.34, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2012 13:50:06 Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the reason for " DEFINES += QT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII "
> > in the platformsupport.pro file?
> >
> > I just hit that and would like to understa
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 13:50:06 Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the reason for " DEFINES += QT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII "
> in the platformsupport.pro file?
>
> I just hit that and would like to understand why we have this
> inconvenience here.
Ok, i don't know the specific on why it is
- Original Message -
> From: "kai.koe...@nokia.com"
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org
>> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ramsay Lincoln (Nokia-MP/Brisbane)
>> Sent: Monday, F
Hi,
what is the reason for " DEFINES += QT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII "
in the platformsupport.pro file?
I just hit that and would like to understand why we have this
inconvenience here.
Cheers,
Johannes
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.o
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:23:19 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Torsdag 2. februar 2012 22.30.52 skrev ext Stephen Kelly:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I ported some of kdelibs to Qt5 (just the easy stuff).
>
> Awesome :)
>
> > There are also some accessibility enums that have been removed, and I
> >
On 2/14/12 12:45 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>2) Will there be a release branch, like there was with previous version
>of Qt?
>(Which let a bit of time to stabilize the actual release by cherry-picking
>only showstopper)
>There was none with Qt 4.8.0, why?
Can't comment to the future of the
On 14/02/2012 04:13, ext Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> I think this mail raises a good point.
>
> We are very protective of our bugs, maybe it's the time to reconsier jira
> rights now that we have the Qt Project in full swing :)
>
> I think it would be great if we could get a group of bug triagers st
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Frederik Gladhorn
wrote:
> I think this mail raises a good point.
>
> We are very protective of our bugs, maybe it's the time to reconsier jira
> rights now that we have the Qt Project in full swing :)
>
> I think it would be great if we could get a group of bug tr
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 11:13:41 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> I think this mail raises a good point.
>
> We are very protective of our bugs, maybe it's the time to reconsier jira
> rights now that we have the Qt Project in full swing :)
>
> I think it would be great if we could get a group of b
On Monday 13 February 2012 12:28:06 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We would like to release next version of Qt Commercial 4.8 around mid-March.
>
> It would be really great if we can again sync the LGPL and Commercial
> releases both in timing and content to the extent possible.
>
> If we a
Torsdag 2. februar 2012 22.30.52 skrev ext Stephen Kelly:
> Hi there,
>
> I ported some of kdelibs to Qt5 (just the easy stuff).
Awesome :)
> There are also some accessibility enums that have been removed, and I don't
> know how to port away from (or what to port to).
They didn't make sense and
--
Kai Koehne
Senior Software Engineer
Nokia, Mobile Phones
Nokia gate5 GmbH
Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B
Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Täht
On terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2012 10.47.45, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Tirsdag 14. februar 2012 06.28.00 skrev ext Turunen Tuukka:
> > On 13.2.2012 18.32, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
> > >On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 12.28.06, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>
>
> > I think good timing for
I think this mail raises a good point.
We are very protective of our bugs, maybe it's the time to reconsier jira
rights now that we have the Qt Project in full swing :)
I think it would be great if we could get a group of bug triagers started, for
KDE for example that leads to fewer stale bugs
Tirsdag 14. februar 2012 06.28.00 skrev ext Turunen Tuukka:
> On 13.2.2012 18.32, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
> >On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 12.28.06, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> I think good timing for the 4.8 patch releases would the roughly:
>
> 4.8.1 in mid-March
> 4.8.2 in end-May
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
