Re: [Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-10 Thread BRM
> From: "shane.kea...@accenture.com" >T he current default behaviour of Qt sockets is that they allocate an >unbounded > amount of memory if the application is not reading all data from the socket > but > the event loop is running. > In the worst case, this causes memory allocation failure res

[Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-10 Thread shane.kearns
The current default behaviour of Qt sockets is that they allocate an unbounded amount of memory if the application is not reading all data from the socket but the event loop is running. In the worst case, this causes memory allocation failure resulting in a crash or app exit due to bad_alloc exc

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-02-10 Thread kai.koehne
>> -Original Message- >> From: ext BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 3:34 PM >> To: Beck Wolfgang (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); Koehne Kai (Nokia-MP/Berlin); >> development@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends) >> >> > Fro

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 10/02/2012 07:46, ext Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +, ext > casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote: >> does adding the documentation to the headers not make compilation >> slower? >> > pretty much negligible. but: putting docs into headers causes many > unnecess

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-02-10 Thread kai.koehne
> -Original Message- > From: ext BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 3:34 PM > To: Beck Wolfgang (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); Koehne Kai (Nokia-MP/Berlin); > development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends) > > > From: "wolf

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread BRM
> From: "casper.vandonde...@nokia.com" > On 2/9/12 10:44 PM, "ext BRM" wrote: >>> From: "casper.vandonde...@nokia.com" > >>> Just to add what I think to Marius' comments: >>> 1. Doxygen would need some extra features, the major one being QML, but >>> also being able to use index files to easil

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-02-10 Thread BRM
> From: "wolfgang.b...@nokia.com" > The controlling of the category will be done using a configuration file. > QLog contains a private class that creates a file watcher for the > configuration > file. > So not only if you start the application but during runtime as well the > category > filter

Re: [Development] Update: State of x86 SIMD in Qt

2012-02-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2012 19.25.38, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 13.14.28, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I will proceed to merging qblendfunctions and qmemfunctions into the draw > > helpers. > > Done with the blend functions, including the removal of the big 1

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread André Somers
Op 2/10/2012 2:15 PM, casper.vandonde...@nokia.com schreef: > On 2/10/12 8:07 AM, "ext Andre Somers" wrote: > >> Op 9-2-2012 19:13, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com schreef: >>> On 09/02/2012 10:33, ext Manuel Nickschas wrote: On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:36:09 ext Olivier Goffart wrote: >

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +, ext casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote: > It can lead to a mess though. We would need some clearly defined > boundaries about where to put documentation. > you could just make it a switch and continue building qt docs without using it. but i agree that doc

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread casper.vandonderen
On 2/10/12 8:07 AM, "ext Andre Somers" wrote: >Op 9-2-2012 19:13, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com schreef: >> On 09/02/2012 10:33, ext Manuel Nickschas wrote: >>> On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:36:09 ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > I am working on QDoc part-time and we have been discussing some >>

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread casper.vandonderen
On 2/9/12 10:44 PM, "ext BRM" wrote: >> From: "casper.vandonde...@nokia.com" > >>Just to add what I think to Marius' comments: >>1. Doxygen would need some extra features, the major one being QML, but >>also being able to use index files to easily link for instance the >>Creator docs to the Qt

Re: [Development] RFC: The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Friday 10 February 2012 08:07:07 Andre Somers wrote: > Op 9-2-2012 19:13, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com schreef: > > On 09/02/2012 10:33, ext Manuel Nickschas wrote: > >> On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:36:09 ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > I am working on QDoc part-time and we have been discus

Re: [Development] The Future of QDoc

2012-02-10 Thread bill.king
Can I add a request for creator integration? Ie, as a build target, and also have it output to the issues pane for click-nagivation? -- Bill King Lead Test Engineer Nokia, Qt Creator team http://qt.nokia.com From: development-bounces+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-10 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/10/12 12:23 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On quinta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2012 20.00.40, John Layt wrote: >> 1) Change QLocale date/time format API to match ICU/CLDR features. >>This is >> by necessity a source-incompatible change. >> >> 2) Change the date/time format codes to match