Re: [Development] Separation of QtQuick 1 from QtDeclarative repo

2012-02-05 Thread martin.jones
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+martin.jones=nokia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+martin.jones=nokia@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:18 PM > To: Ahumada Sergio (Nokia-MP/Oslo); development@

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread Turunen Tuukka
On 5.2.2012 16.12, "lars.kn...@nokia.com" wrote: >We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out of >our source code that we can then release. For the Alpha I propose that we >only do source packages (great if we get binaries though), we will however >need to prepare for

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-02-05 Thread wolfgang.beck
That's exactly right. Category log is not on at all at default. If category log is on the default output is used (same of qDebug()). Only logging in an output log file is active if you explicit set this in your config file. Activation of category log comes from outside via configuration file and

Re: [Development] Work on qDebug and friends

2012-02-05 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 05 February 2012 10:50:48 BRM wrote: > > From: Diego Iastrubni > > > >On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM, David Faure wrote: > > > >Once this goes in I'll add support for %pid%, %processname% and > >%timestamp%,> > >>and we'll be all set :) > > > >You meant %threadid% of course... right? >

Re: [Development] Work on qDebug and friends

2012-02-05 Thread BRM
> From: Diego Iastrubni >On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM, David Faure wrote: > >Once this goes in I'll add support for %pid%, %processname% and %timestamp%, >>and we'll be all set :) > >You meant %threadid% of course... right? Wouldn't having both available be useful? Ben

Re: [Development] Work on qDebug and friends

2012-02-05 Thread Diego Iastrubni
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM, David Faure wrote: > Once this goes in I'll add support for %pid%, %processname% and > %timestamp%, > and we'll be all set :) > You meant %threadid% of course... right? ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project

Re: [Development] Thread-safety on implicitly-shared classes

2012-02-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 5 de February de 2012 17.10.55, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Yes, so we can either go through and clean them all up at once (best, > since it might require API changes as with QString::utf16()), or introduce > a new name for this kind of thread safety and document which classes work > t

Re: [Development] Plugin loader for Qt 5

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/5/12 4:38 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >Hi all > >Lars's email about the feature freeze included a line about the plugin >mechanism in Qt. I posted about this many moons ago but it's still >unfinished. >Thanks to Brad, it at least has stopped using QSettings to cache >information. > >Ho

Re: [Development] Thread-safety on implicitly-shared classes

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/5/12 5:30 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >Hi all > >During the QJsonDocument review process, I pointed out a problem with >using >const_cast that I argued was a violation of the thread-safety rules. Lars >disagreed, so we talked here at FOSDEM. Strict reading of the docs at > http:/

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/5/12 4:27 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote: >On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, wrote: >> * finish codecForCStrings & codecForTr removal (QTBUG-21872) > >Relatedly - but I think it probably deserves separate mention - would >be the defaulting of passing raw bytes to QString to use utf8 >encodin

[Development] Thread-safety on implicitly-shared classes

2012-02-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hi all During the QJsonDocument review process, I pointed out a problem with using const_cast that I argued was a violation of the thread-safety rules. Lars disagreed, so we talked here at FOSDEM. Strict reading of the docs at http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/threads-reentrancy.htm

[Development] Plugin loader for Qt 5

2012-02-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hi all Lars's email about the feature freeze included a line about the plugin mechanism in Qt. I posted about this many moons ago but it's still unfinished. Thanks to Brad, it at least has stopped using QSettings to cache information. However, we still need to get some information from the plugin

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread Robin Burchell
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, wrote: > * finish codecForCStrings & codecForTr removal (QTBUG-21872) Relatedly - but I think it probably deserves separate mention - would be the defaulting of passing raw bytes to QString to use utf8 encoding. It's a little more involved, but definitely somethin

[Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
Hi everybody, the weather in Europe seems to follow our schedule these days. It's freezing cold. We're now starting with our feature freeze for Qt 5. Let's go a bit through what this means and what we need to do next. We will soon have to start preparing the Alpha of Qt5. The purpose of the Alph