Hi Todd,
It looks like the qwindowsglcontext.cpp file does not request a swap interval
of 1 anywhere, which would mean you have to pick the option "always vsync,
regardless of what application requests"-option if such a thing exists. If you
did this and it makes no difference then the driver is
On Friday, January 13, 2012 22:37:16 Johan Thelin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been constructing a proxy model that hides multiple underlying
> models. In this process, I have to translate the custom roles for each
> model. E.g. the custom role enumeration for the duration of a music
> track is not t
On Sunday, 15 de January de 2012 20.25.17, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> Technically interesting here is the question how such a
> situation cloud be managed? Using C++11 'final' would
> prevent the reimplementation. But using pre C++11, the only
> idea I have is to define a dummy function with a differen
On Sunday, 15 de January de 2012 23.09.35, John Layt wrote:
> * A QCldrLocale is not really needed for Qt purposes, it's only needed for
> anyone who wants to know what individual settings are, like KDE
What would this class provide that the regular QLocale wouldn't?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.ma
Well it looks like the slowness I'm seeing is due to the rendering thread using
all of the CPU. I tried toggling the nvidia driver settings for vsync and
triple-buffering but that doesn’t change the behavior. Is there anything else
I can try? Do other people see acceptable performance on Wind
2012/1/15 Giuseppe D'Angelo :
> 2012/1/15 Gábor Lehel :
>> 2012/1/7 Thiago Macieira :
>>> On Saturday, 7 de January de 2012 01.03.50, David Faure wrote:
Shouldn't we clean that up for Qt5 and just use a bool for the contains
method again? The Qt4 API ensures that nobody still has if (con
On Sunday 15 Jan 2012 19:04:09 John Layt wrote:
> I think I'm favouring the second option as being cleaner and easier to
> implement in phases.
After reading more of the ICU number API and trying some things out, I now
think sticking closer to the current model will actually match the ICU API
b
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>
> Off topic:
>
>>
>> There would still be silent errors for people who have reimplemented
>> the createRequest method (it's virtual).
>>
>
> Technically interesting here is the question how such a
> situation cloud be managed? Using C++11 'fi
Off topic:
>
> There would still be silent errors for people who have reimplemented
> the createRequest method (it's virtual).
>
Technically interesting here is the question how such a
situation cloud be managed? Using C++11 'final' would
prevent the reimplementation. But using pre C++11, th
Hi,
Apologies for an extended absence, life got rather busy. I've now pushed the
first of my QDate changes for review, but the QLocale stuff now needs more
focus as the next step.
Discussions back in November around QLocale resulted in a decision to move to
using ICU as the backend for all lo
2012/1/15 Gábor Lehel :
> 2012/1/7 Thiago Macieira :
>> On Saturday, 7 de January de 2012 01.03.50, David Faure wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we clean that up for Qt5 and just use a bool for the contains
>>> method again? The Qt4 API ensures that nobody still has if (contains()==2)
>>> in their code anyway
On 1/15/12 5:08 PM, "ext Richard Moore" wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> But to think first about what "createRequest" really does is a good
>>idea:
>> It not only creates a request, it also sends it, so why not rename it to
>> 'doRequest' or something similar whic
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> But to think first about what "createRequest" really does is a good idea:
> It not only creates a request, it also sends it, so why not rename it to
> 'doRequest' or something similar which is different to 'createReply'
> which is as misleadin
2012/1/7 Thiago Macieira :
> On Saturday, 7 de January de 2012 01.03.50, David Faure wrote:
>> Shouldn't we clean that up for Qt5 and just use a bool for the contains
>> method again? The Qt4 API ensures that nobody still has if (contains()==2)
>> in their code anyway.
>
> I think it should be gon
On 13.01.2012 14:10, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 13:00 + schrieb Giuseppe D'Angelo:
>> On 13 January 2012 12:32, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
what about the slightly more garden-variety approach of deprecating
the old one and introducing a new method?
>>>
>>>
15 matches
Mail list logo