Re: [Development] State of x86 SIMD in Qt

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 29 de December de 2011 15.16.19, jason.bar...@nokia.com wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > > I can get started, but I need to know: how is this code tested? How can I > > verify that things are working? > The best way to test this is to run the lancelot autotests to verify that > the output of

[Development] Dropping iWMMXt?

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
The only changes done to the file in the past almost 3 years are the license header updates and one overall change done to all draw helpers. Even the MMX helpers had two more changes in the period (one might be considered non- trivial). iWMMXt is present on Intel XScale PXA27x processors, which ar

Re: [Development] CI System : License Check : Allow more than one copyright line

2011-12-30 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > I've created a Jira Task for tst_license.pl, since some of you have > already requested to allow more than one copyright line. > > The information can be found here: > > https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTQAINFRA-404 Now I actually r

[Development] drawhelpers thread-safe?

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
They don't look like they are thread-safe, at least not the qInitDrawHelperAsm function. Is that function supposed to be thread-safe? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] A micro API review: for V3(md5) and V5(sha1) in QUuid

2011-12-30 Thread Denis Dzyubenko
Hi João On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:31 PM, wrote: > [ Re-trying after the previous massive quoting and line-wrap fail :-/ ] > > Denis Dzyubenko wrote: >> 2011/12/9 João Abecasis : >> >>    inline QUuid QUuid::createFromName(const QUuid &ns, const >> >>    QString &name) >> >>    { >> >>        ret

[Development] V8 doesn't build in cross-compilation

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
I have an ARM and a MIPS cross-compilation builds. My host machine is a 64-bit x86-64. Configure was run with no flags related to V8. It told me: V8 module .. yes mkspecs/qconfig.pri's QT_CONFIG contains "v8" but not "v8snapshot". When I try to compile, it ends in: make: *** No rule

Re: [Development] V8's location

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 12 de December de 2011 19.34.21, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 12 de December de 2011 18.03.53, aaron.kenn...@nokia.com wrote: > > > $ git reset --hard d28b6a024826aaa48a8b3e69c096d01c91aff2c9 > > > Checking out files: 100% (894/894), done. > > > HEAD is now at d28b6a0 Add flag to

Re: [Development] 16-bit PCRE landed in upstream master

2011-12-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 13.40.09, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly : > > This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 > > bit API already. > > I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the > mailing list. What are the people

Re: [Development] 16-bit PCRE landed in upstream master

2011-12-30 Thread Robin Burchell
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly : >> This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit >> API already. > > I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the > mailing list. What are the people's opinions

Re: [Development] 16-bit PCRE landed in upstream master

2011-12-30 Thread Jonas M. Gastal
On Friday 30 December 2011 13:40:09 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly : > > This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 > > bit API already. > > I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the > mailing list. What are the people's opin

Re: [Development] 16-bit PCRE landed in upstream master

2011-12-30 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly : > This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit > API already. I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the mailing list. What are the people's opinions about whether it's "good" (for any value of good) for Qt 5.0 to depe

[Development] Qt 5 BAT and Exploratory tests in desktop

2011-12-30 Thread Peetu.Hannukainen
Hi We in Qt Test House team did have Qt5 BAT test study between weeks 39 and 52. We executed some manual tests against public Qt5 sources. Test plan did consist of repeatable BAT cases and Exploratory part. Test applications that we used in tests were public Qt examples. Test plan and results

Re: [Development] My Android QhrisTma5 wish list.

2011-12-30 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On 12/30/2011 12:55 AM, Hilary Cheng wrote: > I hope the MIPS platforms will be supported soon. I am already on this. But > the QML is still not working fine... There are patches in gerrit for QtV8/QML/MIPS in Gerrit... ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] Ref-counted quit

2011-12-30 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Friday 30 December 2011 01:48:12 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Hi, > > The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it > looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because > no solution has been proposed. > > http://codereview.qt-project.org/#chang