On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:36:43 Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo
wrote:
> > On 27 December 2011 15:08, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> >> I'm all for killing the whole QAIM concept for something better (that
> >> we don't have yet), but before that ha
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 23:33:35 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 01.48.12, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment
> > it looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked
> >
Just FYI.
This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit
API already.
I'd recommend that the people who know about QRegExp take a look.
Thanks,
Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 01.48.12, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it
> looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because
> no solution has been proposed.
>
> http://codereview.qt-project.org/
Hi,
The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it
looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because
no solution has been proposed.
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,10408
I'm just moving the discussion here. I know asiego is not s
I hope the MIPS platforms will be supported soon. I am already on this. But
the QML is still not working fine...
Is the current git aligned with Qt 4.8 ?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:20, BogDan wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>My name is BogDan Vatra, I'm the guy behind Necessitas project (Qt
Depending on the level of platform differences between the three Android
versions, we might be able to use the exclusive builds implementations, which
we use for debug + release build on windows. We've already used it for
32bit/64bit in combination with debug + release, to give a 4x combo.
Noth
On Dec 22, 2011, at 9:20 PM, ext BogDan wrote:
> - Menus, on android the menu bar is completely different from other platforms
> , it is always hidden, and to make it visible the user must press the menu
> button. Currently there is no way to do it, because QMenuBar is a widget and
> even more i
On Thursday, 29 de December de 2011 17.00.09, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 1) Drop the MMX code and the 3dNow! extensions now
Report. These are the functions being dropped and their impact:
[where XXX is mmx, sse, mmx3dnow and sse3dnow, YYY are composition modes]
- qt_blend_color_argb_XXX
Impect: no
On Thursday, 29 de December de 2011 12.12.53, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 1) immediately disable the use of MMX technology registers in 64-bit mode.
> Turns out that this is already supported in the code because MSVC in 64-bit
> mode does not offer MMX support. We only need to apply this to GCC and IC
Hi Thiago,
> I can get started, but I need to know: how is this code tested? How can I
> verify that things are working?
The best way to test this is to run the lancelot autotests to verify that the
output of the raster engine is the same before and after. The code for the
baseline server is
Hello
[Glossary at the bottom]
I began adding an AVX-mode build for certain files in Qt. While I don't plan on
writing new routines using AVX instructions, the presence of the VEX prefix
should already improve performance. It was quite easy to do so for qimage_sse2
and qimage_ssse3, which are new
On Thursday, 29 de December de 2011 02.19.46, jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote:
> Thiago Macieira [thiago.macie...@intel.com] wrote:
> > I'd like to nominate Robin Burchell (a.k.a. w00t on IRC) for approver in
> > Qt. He's been around Qt for some time now and has been contributing both
> > in his wor
13 matches
Mail list logo
