On Dec 9, 2011, at 9:00 PM, ext Charley Bay wrote:
>From the description, this appears to be an effort to establish a common API
>or approach for *both* Qt5Widgets and QML2+? That's what I'd be most excited
>about (one approach). Selfishly, I'm mostly focused on QML 2+ in Qt5+, even
>we'll
On 12/12/2011, at 4:59 PM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Laszlo Papp said:
>>
>> 1) Build and software testing service
>> Is there a build and software testing service provided for projects in
>> the Qt Playground repositories ? I have not seen any mentionings about
>> that so far. and it is an import
Laszlo Papp said:
>
> 1) Build and software testing service
> Is there a build and software testing service provided for projects in
> the Qt Playground repositories ? I have not seen any mentionings about
> that so far. and it is an important question in my case, for instance.
> I have been using
On Monday 12 December 2011 10:30:31 Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Stephen Kelly said:
> > On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 13:54:37 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Friday, 28 de October de 2011 12:38:38 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > > > We've been moving this lib quite a bit already. If we move it
> > >
Hi Holger,
> > Hi again,
> >
> > the previous points are not answered but I have one more question. Why
> > do we need to have the QML_GLOBAL_INDEX slot and carry it around?
> Why
> > can't we just patch src/contexts.cc with the current code but resolve
> > the qml_global and qml_global_global thr
Stephen Kelly said:
> On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 13:54:37 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Friday, 28 de October de 2011 12:38:38 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > > We've been moving this lib quite a bit already. If we move it again, I'd
> > > prefer it would end up at it's final location. The mov
On Sunday, 11 de December de 2011 14.47.21, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> I now redid the benchmarks comparing qjson (as provided by my Ubuntu
> install, linked against Qt 4.7), qjsonparser (latest HEAD, linked against
> Qt 5) and my qtbinaryjson (linked against Qt5 as well). Here are the
> numbers
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Andre Somers wrote:
> However, like I said, I guess I am missing something here. Could you
> explain what the relationship is between this binary format and the JSON
> format, and how it helps parsing & creating JSON?
You're missing the bit where the binary format
Op 11-12-2011 15:55, lars.kn...@nokia.com schreef:
> The binary representation is optimized for fast reading. The binary
> format
> is relatively compact and stores the whole object in one blob.
>> Is this a standard binary format of JSON, or something of your own devise?
> It's something I wrote.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, wrote:
>>Is this a standard binary format of JSON, or something of your own devise?
>
> It's something I wrote. I wanted it to be something that you can simply
> mmap from a file and use without ever having to parse anything to make
> saving and restoring of json
Hi Sivan,
On 12/11/11 10:39 AM, "ext Sivan Greenberg" wrote:
>Hi Lars!
>
>On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, wrote:
>> there were quite a few discussions and requests over the last months to
>> add Json support as part of QtCore, and maybe integrating one of the
>> existing parsers.
>
>There we
On 12/11/11 1:31 AM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
>hi,
>
>On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
>> I've benchmarked parsing speed and compared to the qjson
>> (http://qjson.sourceforge.net/). It's around 7 times faster for the
>> test.json file included in the project (the test case used in q
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
> > I've benchmarked parsing speed and compared to the qjson
> > (http://qjson.sourceforge.net/). It's around 7 times faster for the
> > test.json file included in the project (the test case
Hi Lars!
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, wrote:
> there were quite a few discussions and requests over the last months to
> add Json support as part of QtCore, and maybe integrating one of the
> existing parsers.
There were also discussions and even a couple of bug report about
adding "native
14 matches
Mail list logo
