Re: [Development] Proposing Christopher Ham for Approver Status

2011-12-04 Thread patrick.burke
Seconding as noted. Patrick From: Smith Sarah.J (Nokia-MP-Qt/Brisbane) Sent: Monday, 5 December 2011 17:03 To: development@qt-project.org Cc: Burke Patrick (Nokia-MP-Qt/Brisbane); Ham Christopher (Nokia-MP-Qt/Brisbane) Subject: Proposing Christopher Ham fo

[Development] Proposing Christopher Ham for Approver Status

2011-12-04 Thread sarah.j.smith
Following the Qt Open Governance process I hereby propose Christopher Ham for the role of approver. As an intern last summer he made a number of contributions to Qt QML, and is now back with us. Patrick Burke is seconding this proposal. Please raise any concerns you have before the end of 23rd

Re: [Development] Unicode/i18n support

2011-12-04 Thread Sylvain Pointeau
Hi, would it be possible to have the code somewhere in git on gitorious or github? I would like to contribute by adding boost regexp... after all, boost could be also interesting, you can anyway embed it in qt to avoid the binary break. boost regexp can rely on ICU for unicode, let's see how it c

Re: [Development] Who does what in the Qt Project

2011-12-04 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > On 12/01/2011 03:05 PM, ext Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote: >> https://wiki.qt-project.org/Public_Autotest_Infrastructure > > Thanks! Yes, thanks - this certainly makes things much clearer on the auto test side of things. > > https://wiki.qt-project.o

Re: [Development] Storing is-a QObject fact with metatypes

2011-12-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Friday, December 02, 2011 18:05:41 you wrote: > > What do you think of the proposed change? > > How much does it break to require type to be defined? > It is probably ok to force the type to be defined. It makes this necessary: http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,10407 and it breaks all