Re: [Development] Who does what in the Qt Project

2011-12-01 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:53:23 PM quim@nokia.com wrote: > Approvers: is there a way to know who is an approver? It would be also > useful to have a rough idea of what approvers are interested in a specific > component. And link to profile again. http://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,

Re: [Development] Who does what in the Qt Project

2011-12-01 Thread Sergio Ahumada Navea
> > What about the infrastructure? Marius Storm-Olsen seems to have the only > official role. It would be useful to map all the areas and roles under that > critical piece of the Qt project, with the same level of detail than the > software maintainers. https://wiki.qt-project.org/Public_Autote

[Development] Who does what in the Qt Project

2011-12-01 Thread quim.gil
Since we are a meritocratic organization it is important to know who does what. Currently it is difficult (if not impossible?) to know the whole picture. Please help mapping everybody with an official Qt Project role at https://wiki.qt-project.org/Who_does_what and linked pages. Maintainers: I

Re: [Development] Qt Project Infrastructure Work

2011-12-01 Thread Charley Bay
Marcus spaketh: > I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a > little about infrastructure for the Qt project. infrastructure> https://wiki.qt-project.org/Infrastructure > > IMHO this is an excellent effort -- the current system seems well thought-out, and is clearly

Re: [Development] Qt Project Infrastructure Work

2011-12-01 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/01/2011 08:13 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a >> little about infrastructure for the Qt project. At Kitware we have > > Is there any minute abo

Re: [Development] Qt Project Infrastructure Work

2011-12-01 Thread Sergio Ahumada Navea
Hi, On 12/01/2011 08:13 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > Hi, > > I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a > little about infrastructure for the Qt project. At Kitware we have Is there any minute about this talk ? Who was there ? > been building on the topic branch funct

[Development] Qt Project Infrastructure Work

2011-12-01 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a little about infrastructure for the Qt project. At Kitware we have been building on the topic branch functionality developed for the Qt project, adding features and fixing bugs we found in a branch available on Github [2]. I

Re: [Development] Unicode/i18n support

2011-12-01 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 1 December 2011 14:44, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > I'll do some other benchmarks later... Robin kindly reminded me that I forgot the baseline, i.e. QRegExp in Qt4 :-) * Start testing of REBenchmark * Config: Using QTest library 4.7.4, Qt 4.7.4 PASS : REBenchmark::initTestCase

Re: [Development] Unicode/i18n support

2011-12-01 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 1 December 2011 09:13, Sylvain Pointeau wrote: > and if you remove the jit compile from PCRE? is it closer to ICU? Studying the pattern, without JIT: * Start testing of REBenchmark * Config: Using QTest library 4.7.4, Qt 4.7.4 PASS : REBenchmark::initTestCase() RESULT : REBe

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] Building Qt5 for embedded Linux ARM - compiler problems

2011-12-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 1 de December de 2011 14.24.54, Dietrich.Gossen@continental- corporation.com wrote: > Hi, > I read this… [labs.qt.nokia.com] labs post, but I couldn’t figure out how > build Qt5 for ARM with embedded linux. My main problem is that I don’t > know which compiler to use. I am using the i.

Re: [Development] Unicode/i18n support

2011-12-01 Thread Sylvain Pointeau
and if you remove the jit compile from PCRE? is it closer to ICU? ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development