Re: [Development] Qt 5 Raspberry Pi device program

On 2011-11-23 02:51 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > We hope it is useful for the Qt Project to speed up Qt 5 testing > and development as well as to get the first wave of Qt 5 apps, > ported or created. This is going to be so much fun, Qt5 and $50 hardware (delivered). Where or how can we found out more ab

Re: [Development] Rebasing a contribution

On Wednesday, 23 de November de 2011 21:33:14 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:07:17PM +0100, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > So, if I have reviewed your patch #6 in the contribution and you need to > > rebase in order to modify something, then rebase, push #7, leave a comment

[Development] CI System : License Check : Allow more than one copyright line

Hi, I've created a Jira Task for tst_license.pl, since some of you have already requested to allow more than one copyright line. The information can be found here: https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTQAINFRA-404 The idea is then publish this information under http://wiki.qt-project.org a

[Development] Qt 5 Raspberry Pi device program

Hi, if you are interested in Qt 5 & Raspberry Pi: https://blog.qt.nokia.com/2011/11/24/qt-5-with-rasberry-pi-a-delicious-mix-with-home-delivery/ http://wiki.qt-project.org/Qt_RaspberryPi http://wiki.qt-project.org/Qt_RaspberryPi/Device_program We have about 400 boards to be distributed among th

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

On 11/23/11 6:47 PM, "ext Andre Somers" wrote: > > > >Op 23-11-2011 14:52, shane.kea...@accenture.com schreef: > > > > >Hi, > >I think moving the item models back into >QtGui would be better than QtCore. >* QML and Widgets

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

On 11/23/11 3:30 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Monday, 21 de November de 2011 21:25:07 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: >> One interesting piece will be how we continue with this. We will most >> likely need one regexp engine in QtCore (as regexp's are being used >> internally in Qt in a couple

Re: [Development] Rebasing a contribution

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:07:17PM +0100, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > So, if I have reviewed your patch #6 in the contribution and you need to > rebase in order to modify something, then rebase, push #7, leave a comment > saying it was a rebase, modify and submit #8. That way, I can compare #7 t

[Development] Rebasing a contribution

Hello Here's a recommendation for submitting rebased changes to Gerrit, coming from someone who likes to compare different versions of a submission. When you rebase, submit the rebase *only*. Do not change anything in your contribution. Then add a comment saying you rebased, so that a reviewer wi

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

Op 23-11-2011 14:52, shane.kea...@accenture.com schreef: Hi, I think moving the item models back into QtGui would be better than QtCore. * QML and Widgets applications both depend on QtGui * The item models have no use outside of a GUI application. * QtGui was the location of these classes

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 13:52:17 you wrote: > Hi, > > I think moving the item models back into QtGui would be better than QtCore. > * QML and Widgets applications both depend on QtGui > * The item models have no use outside of a GUI application. > * QtGui was the location of these classes

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

On Wednesday, 23 de November de 2011 15:48:41 Robin Burchell wrote: > 2011/11/23 Thiago Macieira : > > We don't even have to mark this one deprecated. If the new engine's API is > > compatible, it could be used for both. > > well doesn't that depend on how complete you want SC to be? > QRegExp

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

2011/11/23 Thiago Macieira : > We don't even have to mark this one deprecated. If the new engine's API is > compatible, it could be used for both. well doesn't that depend on how complete you want SC to be? QRegExp uses different syntax than pretty much every other RE engine, definitely differ

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

On Wednesday, 23 de November de 2011 08:33:35 craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote: > I don't think you need to install these static libraries (although it won't > do any harm if you do). The main need is for Qt to use it internally, not > to expose anything from it through its API. That makes the use of PCR

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

On Tuesday, 22 de November de 2011 15:07:46 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 32bit Linux: > >text data bss dec hex filename > 387691 728 176 388595 5edf3 libpcre- jit/lib/libpcre.so > 260245 580 12 260837 3fae5 libpcre/lib/libpcre.so > 15

Re: [Development] Regular expression libraries for QRegExp

On Monday, 21 de November de 2011 21:25:07 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > One interesting piece will be how we continue with this. We will most > likely need one regexp engine in QtCore (as regexp's are being used > internally in Qt in a couple of places). If we move QRegExp out, we still > need to

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

Hi, I think moving the item models back into QtGui would be better than QtCore. * QML and Widgets applications both depend on QtGui * The item models have no use outside of a GUI application. * QtGui was the location of these classes in Qt4. From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@q

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

On Tuesday 22 November 2011 18:23:44 Marc Mutz wrote: > On Tuesday November 22 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: > [...] > > > It is useful to move them to QtCore. > > [...] > > I never understood why QAIM is in QtCore and QAPM and the rest of the bunch > isn't. > > +1 I also support this change. ___

[Development] Qt itemmodels in QtQuick context (was: Re: Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore)

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:04, wrote: > Bart Cerneels said: >>I incorrectly assumed that they were already in QtCore along with >>QAIM. I for one am a big fan of using proxymodels with/from QML and >>can think of quite a few use-cases. > > Note that it doesn't have to be in QtCore to use with QML

Re: [Development] Qt5 Development on a Tablet PC

Hi, I have port one existing apps to android using necessitas (Qt4.8 not 5.0). and It works fine (no modification on source code !) ... and necessitas is only at alpha stage !! Le 23/11/2011 11:13, Cristian Adam a écrit : Hi, Has anybody ran apps / developed Qt5 on a Tablet PC? By Tablet

[Development] Qt5 Development on a Tablet PC

Hi, Has anybody ran apps / developed Qt5 on a Tablet PC? By Tablet PC I mean the 8" screen and larger . That list consists in the following OSes: Android, Windows 7, iOS and WebOS. Only Windows 7 is officially supp

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

Bart Cerneels said: >I incorrectly assumed that they were already in QtCore along with >QAIM. I for one am a big fan of using proxymodels with/from QML and >can think of quite a few use-cases. Note that it doesn't have to be in QtCore to use with QML. QtGui would do just as well, but these QAIM c

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

2011/11/22 Stephen Kelly : > > > Hi there, > > > > I propose to move the following files into QtCore (along with their > implementations, omitted for brevity): > > > > * itemviews/qabstractproxymodel.h > > * itemviews/qidentityproxymodel.h > > * itemviews/qsortfilterproxymodel.h > > * itemviews/qit