On 11/15/11 2:33 PM, "ext Richard Moore" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Peter Hartmann
> wrote:
>> I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
>> mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
>> Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an atta
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Peter Hartmann
wrote:
> I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
> mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
> Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an attached
> diff (see for instance [1]), but since e.g. SSL
Hello,
I would like to propose the introduction of a low-traffic security
mailing list for posting security patches for Qt.
Right now we always need to write a blog post entry with an attached
diff (see for instance [1]), but since e.g. SSL certificates get
compromised a lot these days, this do
Hi,
Lately I've been working on trying to get the qt5/qtbase autotests and
benchmarks working again on Mac OS X. It's pretty slow going, mostly because I
cannot do it all at once. I've already put in several changes to get the
autotests to at least build on Mac OS X. At the moment, I'm waiting
On 15/11/11 10.24, "ext Alan Alpert" wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:58:56 ext Alan Alpert wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:29:58 Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP-Qt/Oslo) wrote:
>> > On 11/10/11 1:32 AM, "Alan Alpert" wrote:
>> > >On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 06:43:34 Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP-Qt/Oslo) wrote:
>> > >> I
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:58:56 ext Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:29:58 Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP-Qt/Oslo) wrote:
> > On 11/10/11 1:32 AM, "Alan Alpert" wrote:
> > >On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 06:43:34 Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP-Qt/Oslo) wrote:
> > >> I agree with most of the things in this thread, but not