Hi all,
At the DevDays contributors day there was a meeting with interested
parties from QtDF and the (mostly KDE-related) community about a
replacement for the scheduled-to-be-removed QSettings. Before the
meeting I gathered that there is interest in using DConf as the backend,
so I prepared a li
On 10/31/2011 11:05 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Holger Hans Peter Freyther said:
>> On 10/24/2011 04:21 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2011 04:01 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> the response I am responding to ended up in moderation, I am now properly
>> subscrib
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, wrote:
>
> On 30 Oct 2011, at 11:08, ext Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>> 2011/10/30 Thiago Macieira :
>>> On Saturday, 29 de October de 2011 09:22:07 Chris Meyer wrote:
I would like to call attention to the following problem which is that
the Qt 4.8 build fai
On Friday 28 October 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> == Summary ==
>
> I'm considering adding some cmake files to Qt, which would be installed by
> Qt, and which would make it easier for CMake based projects to depend on
> Qt.
>
> I'm CC'ing the cmake developers too see what they think of t
On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 16:40:32 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 11:59 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I can't post the code just yet, but I can post the new API.
> >
> > Questions:
> > - I un-deprecated fromEncoded and toEncoded, as they're used everywhere.
> >
> > Should I d
On 10/25/2011 11:59 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I can't post the code just yet, but I can post the new API.
>
> Questions:
> - I un-deprecated fromEncoded and toEncoded, as they're used everywhere.
> Should I do the same for fromPercentEncoding and toPercentEncoding? They
> convert from QStr
On 30 Oct 2011, at 11:08, ext Alexis Menard wrote:
> 2011/10/30 Thiago Macieira :
>> On Saturday, 29 de October de 2011 09:22:07 Chris Meyer wrote:
>>> I would like to call attention to the following problem which is that
>>> the Qt 4.8 build fails using the latest Mac OS 10.7 / Xcode 4.2 tools.
> Qt Project
> ==
Do note that the Qt Project consists of more then just the Qt Framework.
As such please pay attention in wording and do distinguish those two.
>
> * There are no internal docs on how things work to release
> * Never been written down
Because that's simply not true f
On 10/31/11 2:25 PM, "ext Giovanni Bajo" wrote:
>Il giorno 31/ott/2011, alle ore 13:17,
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 10/31/11 10:53 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:44:16 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
What is the policy on adding new dependencies to the Qt proje
On 10/28/11 13:13, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I'm considering adding some cmake files to Qt, which would be installed by Qt,
> and which would make it easier for CMake based projects to depend on Qt.
>
fine by me.
as noted in the other subthreads, you probably want a modular solution
with individu
Il giorno 31/ott/2011, alle ore 13:17,
ha scritto:
> On 10/31/11 10:53 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:44:16 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>>> What is the policy on adding new dependencies to the Qt project?
>>
>> I'd guess that the maintainer for that module
Hey,
Some comments from Hartmut on the topic at hand.
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> João Abecasis wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> João Abecasis wrote:
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> However, despite the change of name, the conference is still a Boost
> conference, at least according to the
On 10/31/11 10:53 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:44:16 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>> What is the policy on adding new dependencies to the Qt project?
>
>I'd guess that the maintainer for that module approves. For qtbase.git,
>that's
>Lars.
>
>Importing third-part
Holger Hans Peter Freyther said:
> On 10/24/2011 04:21 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> > On 10/24/2011 04:01 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> the response I am responding to ended up in moderation, I am now properly
> subscribed (in contrast of using gmane.org). Just to recap,
On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:44:16 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> What is the policy on adding new dependencies to the Qt project?
I'd guess that the maintainer for that module approves. For qtbase.git, that's
Lars.
Importing third-party source code requires approval under the CLA too.
> To me, i
Il giorno 31/ott/2011, alle ore 10:31, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:23:12 you wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Sounds interesting to be present and discuss with the Boost developers
>>> ways to improve collaboration. Maybe someone will finally convince them
On Monday, 31 de October de 2011 10:23:12 you wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Sounds interesting to be present and discuss with the Boost developers
> > ways to improve collaboration. Maybe someone will finally convince them
> > to maintain binary compatibility so their libraries could become
>
Hello people,
I have been to two BoostCon's so far and have friends in that community.
Hartmut being one of them ;-)
The last time I was there, in 2010, I gave a high-level talk on bridging Boost
and Qt. In general, I think the Boost community is very open to this kind of
things and most of al
Hi John,
thank you very much for accepting to be the printer maintainer.
Last year, we (Develer) proposed a patch that was rejected:
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/733
We then opened a bug to discuss an alternative API to implement the features we
require:
https://bugreports.qt.n
On 10/24/2011 04:21 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 04:01 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
Hi again,
the response I am responding to ended up in moderation, I am now properly
subscribed (in contrast of using gmane.org). Just to recap, I have not
asked/intended to just switch off pu
I'm working on porting a structured text renderer to QT and
encountered a problem with inline objects. QTextLayout doesn't support
them even though underlying text layout engine supports it, and
there's actually QTextInlineObject class to represent inline objects.
I think I can work around this by
21 matches
Mail list logo
