On 2011-10-24 09:38 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb
>
> Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI
> base.
These might help with the webserver itself...
https://github.com/nikhilm/qhttpserver
(the above uses NodeJS's http://github.co
On Monday, 24 de October de 2011 15.14.23, Rick Stockton wrote:
> (A) obtain the full mask automatically, and setting
> Qt::MouseButtons accordingly; or
> (B) leave high-order bits unset in events, returning the full
> mask as the value of a SEPARATE function call.
>
> I feel that
QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb
Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI base.
Either it can be a Wt style framework with Qt components, or, a more
traditional MVC framework (more community support on the latter, so that is
mostly likely the POA).
Fork, commit
Okay, I'll be starting a new thread, and, as far as I know, QtWeb is not
taken.
Go ahead and fork the repo, I'll pull in any changes you have.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 2011-10-24 05:55 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> > So, no matter how we look at this, we obvious
On 2011-10-24 05:55 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote:
> So, no matter how we look at this, we obviously need:
>
> 1) FastCGI support
There maybe some clues here if you are not aware of it...
https://github.com/fredemmott/fastcgiqt
> 2) A web server that supports async
With lighttpd and nginx as exampl
So, no matter how we look at this, we obviously need:
1) FastCGI support
2) A web server that supports async
So, we might as well get cracking.
I set up a Gitorious repo here: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb
For the lack of a better name, we'll be calling it QtWeb, if you come up
with a bette
This replaces my 4.x Proposal, which was titled "I have a way to support
*ALL* MOUSE BUTTONS in Qt, while staying compatible with the 4.x
series!" http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/6547/ This
message duplicates a new forum topic at:
http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/
On Monday, 24 de October de 2011 10.11.00, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Can we move V8 out of qtbase and into a top-level module? I've done that
> > mistake above several times. The fact that V8 is inside qtbase means I
> > cannot do a git commit -a, despite the submodule ignore command.
> >
> > Also,
On Monday, October 24, 2011 09:32:00 AM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 de October de 2011, às 17.07.24, you wrote:
> > Samuel Rødal has posted comments on this change.
> >
> > Change subject: Improve drawing scaled image with raster using SSE2
> > ..
On Sunday, 23 de October de 2011, às 17.07.24, you wrote:
> Samuel Rødal has posted comments on this change.
>
> Change subject: Improve drawing scaled image with raster using SSE2
> ..
>
>
> Patch Set 2: Do not submit
>
> You acci
On 10/23/11 10:25 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Sunday, 23 de October de 2011 20.38.28, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> > CC to Lars, because I guess platforms is one of the things a CM would
>> > be responsible for... :)
>> >
>> > As has been previously discussed, the primary platforms for Qt a
11 matches
Mail list logo