From: Cláudio Maia
Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit.
This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats.
The information being stored in the ouput file is the same as the one being
stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more execution
From: Cláudio Maia
---
tester/rt/test.py | 104 +-
1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py
index 9b157e9..0178a8d 100644
--- a/tester/rt/test.py
+++ b/tester/rt/test.py
@@ -339,9 +339,109 @@
From: Cláudio Maia
---
tester/rt/test.py | 115 +-
1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py
index 9b157e9..e0cfdff 100644
--- a/tester/rt/test.py
+++ b/tester/rt/test.py
@@ -339,9 +339,120 @@
From: Cláudio Maia
Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit.
This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats.
The information being stored in the ouput file is the same as the one being
stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more execution
From: Cláudio Maia
Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit.
This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats.
The information being stored in the output file is the same as the one being
stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more executio
From: Cláudio Maia
---
tester/rt/test.py | 116 +-
1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py
index 9b157e9..66f1756 100644
--- a/tester/rt/test.py
+++ b/tester/rt/test.py
@@ -339,9 +339,115 @@
Dear all,
I’ve sent this patch last week but I didn’t receive any feedback on it.
Could please someone review the patch?
Regards,
Cláudio
> On 8 Apr 2020, at 17:55, Cláudio Maia (clrrm) wrote:
>
> From: Cláudio Maia
>
> This patch proposes several fixes in the rsb/configu
Hi Niteesh,
Thank you for your input. Following your suggestion allowed me to boot
successfully RTEMS from u-boot.
Moreover, I confirm that “-O rtems" does not work for me as well.
I have a few questions that I would like to ask you. What exactly is going on
when we execute “bootm 0x20 - 0
Hi Jan,
I tried your solution and it does not work in my case. The following is an
example of the output that I get:
—
U-Boot> fatload mmc 0 0x3000 hello.exe
reading hello.exe
3456844 bytes read in 269 ms (12.3 MiB/s)
U-Boot> bootelf 0x3000
CACHE: Misaligned operatio
From: Cláudio Maia
---
tester/rtems-test | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tester/rtems-test b/tester/rtems-test
index 3eb5701..520366a 100755
--- a/tester/rtems-test
+++ b/tester/rtems-test
@@ -39,4 +39,4 @@ elif test -f ${base}/share/rtems/${PYTHON_WRAPPER}; t
From: Cláudio Maia
This set of patches proposes several fixes for RTEMS Tester
documentation. Namely:
- Text was reviewed and improved for clarity;
- References to 'sparc-rtems5-run' command and 'erc32-run' were removed
from the documentation page. Now, the example uses 'erc32-sis' instead.
F
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 153 ++
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index c3c3fe2..44263da 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -1
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 44263da..96e32ed 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -260,9 +260,6 @@ You can see your executable running in the fi
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 14 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index a95651e..5147f3d 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -98,19 +98,7 @@ make finishes, al
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 96e32ed..32e1ca2 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ BSP build tree:
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 5147f3d..5548ad9 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -62,11 +62,9 @@ You can list the av
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 32e1ca2..a95651e 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -586,6 +586,6 @@ review the available opti
From: Cláudio Maia
This BSP uses 'sparc-rtems5-run' which is not being generated anymore after
compiling the toolchain. Consequently, its execution fails when being used
(i.e., when using '--rtems-bsp=erc32-run'). Thus, to make things consistent
I propose to remove this file.
Cláudio Maia (1):
From: Cláudio Maia
---
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini | 38 -
1 file changed, 38 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini
diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini
b/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini
deleted file
From: Cláudio Maia
This patch proposes several fixes in the rsb/configuration.rst file.
The document was reviewed from top to bottom with the following
modifications being proposed:
- moved the paragraph describing the %source directive closer to where
the directive is introduced in the text,
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/rsb/configuration.rst | 424 +++--
1 file changed, 215 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/rsb/configuration.rst b/user/rsb/configuration.rst
index 4b21dee..561ae60 100644
--- a/user/rsb/configuration.rst
+++ b/user/rsb/c
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index c07fc49..9f9933a 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -280,7 +280,6 @@ BSP build tree:
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 170 ++
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index e3a21c9..b77240b 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -1
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 153809f..e00eb0d 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -61,9 +61,7 @@ You can list the availabl
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index b77240b..c07fc49 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -259,9 +259,6 @@ You can see your executable running in the fi
From: Cláudio Maia
This set of patches proposes several fixes for RTEMS Tester
documentation. Namely:
- Text was reviewed and improved for clarity;
- References to 'sparc-rtems5-run' command and 'erc32-run' were removed
from the documentation page. Now, the example uses 'erc32-sis' instead.
F
From: Cláudio Maia
---
user/tools/tester.rst | 14 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
index 9f9933a..153809f 100644
--- a/user/tools/tester.rst
+++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
@@ -97,19 +97,7 @@ make finishes, al
27 matches
Mail list logo