Hello Joel,
On 2/21/23 16:25, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Subject:
[PATCH rtems-source-builder 1/2] Update to gdb 13.1 for rtems 6
From:
Joel Sherrill
Date:
2/21/23, 16:25
To:
devel@rtems.org
---
rtems/config/6/rtems-default.bset | 2 +-
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-13.1.cfg | 16 ++
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:30, wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tried to build a riscv BSP with the information from Hesham. Thanks again.
> It now compiles the files, but produces a lot of warnings and fails to link
> in the end.
>
> The warnings are of this type
> ../../../cpukit/score/cpu/riscv
> -Original Message-
> From: Hesham Almatary
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2023 14:34
> To: Sommer, Jan
> Cc: j...@rtems.org; devel@rtems.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Update rtems-llvm to version 11.1.0
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:30, wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I t
* Only use BSPs supported by GCC's multilibs. This removes rv32imafdc
* Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
---
config/rtems-bsps-riscv.ini | 5 ++---
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
dif
Is it ok to push if I fix the comment?
--joel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:29 AM Frank Kühndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 2/21/23 16:25, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Subject:
> > [PATCH rtems-source-builder 1/2] Update to gdb 13.1 for rtems 6
> > From:
> > Joel She
This is OK.
Be sure to follow up with a patch to bump the rtems-tools hash in the RSB.
--joel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:14 AM Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> * Only use BSPs supported by GCC's multilibs. This removes rv32imafdc
> * Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
> RV64 BSPs are now
Hi
This may be mechanical but
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2023-February/date.html shows
recent RTEMS test runs with a lot of RISC-V BSP failures. Scanning them, it
seems as though there are 100s of test failures when SMP is enabled. Here
is one example:
https://lists.rtems.org/piperma
On 2/22/23 16:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is it ok to push if I fix the comment?
I confess I have not tried your patch. I noted you have commented out
the gdb-readline8.2.patch. Beside that no surprises and from my side you
can go ahead.
Greetings
Frank
--joel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:29
Hi Sebastian,
This ticket has a number of commits logged against it. What remains or can
it be closed?
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4666
If it can't be closed, an update on what needs to be done should be added
and maybe the milestone bumped.
Thanks.
--joel
__
On 22.02.23 16:14, Hesham Almatary wrote:
* Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
Do we still need the non-medany 64-bit multilibs in GCC? I plan to
adjust the multilib selection a bit and also add multilibs for
non-compact 32-bit variants.
Hi
There will be an RTEMS Open Class held virtually the week of April 24-28
Times each day will be based on the US Central time zone (Chicago).
Adjustments
may be considered to accommodate the participants.
April 24 - Kick Start and Getting Started
April 25-28 - Open Class
Details and registrat
Hello,
Does the current RTEMS version support the Jetson nano board, if not, do
you think It will be a good project for gsoc2023? something like porting
RTEMS to Jetson nano or jetson AGX orin maybe?
Looking forward to your response.
Best Regards
Prakhar
_
Hello,
My name is Prakhar Agrawal and I am interested in contributing to RTEMS as
a gsoc this year.
While going through the list of open projects, the BSP executable
conversion project caught my interest.
I have completed the hello world task for gsoc and now looking to start
contributing to the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 9:26 PM Prakhar Agrawal
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the current RTEMS version support the Jetson nano board, if not, do
> you think It will be a good project for gsoc2023? something like porting
> RTEMS to Jetson nano or jetson AGX orin maybe?
>
I'm torn whether this is a good
14 matches
Mail list logo
