On 22.12.22 19:56, Kinsey Moore wrote:
+++ b/spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupport.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-5.0 OR BSD-2-Clause
+build-type: objects
I just noticed that these build items use CC-BY-SA-5.0 and not
CC-BY-SA-4.0 like all the other build items. I think thi
---
eng/req/items.rst | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eng/req/items.rst b/eng/req/items.rst
index e718605..eb7ce38 100644
--- a/eng/req/items.rst
+++ b/eng/req/items.rst
@@ -2978,6 +2978,8 @@ This type is used by the following types:
* :ref:`SpecTypeBuildBSPItemType`
Merge "default" and "default-by-variant" attributes. Use an enabled-by
expression to select the default value.
---
eng/req/items.rst | 62 +++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eng/req/items.rst b/eng/req/items.rst
index eb
---
eng/req/items.rst | 27 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eng/req/items.rst b/eng/req/items.rst
index c037a93..95531a8 100644
--- a/eng/req/items.rst
+++ b/eng/req/items.rst
@@ -3449,14 +3449,25 @@ This type is used by the following type
I will update these.
Thanks,
Kinsey
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:45 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 22.12.22 19:56, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> > +++ b/spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupport.yml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-5.0 OR BSD-2-Clause
On 17.01.23 15:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
I will update these.
Or we update the other items. What is the difference between v5.0 and
v4.0? Can you update/mix them without issues? If mixed, what is the
overall document license?
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Pu
Update #3715.
---
eng/req/items.rst | 126 +++---
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eng/req/items.rst b/eng/req/items.rst
index 95531a8..19e8726 100644
--- a/eng/req/items.rst
+++ b/eng/req/items.rst
@@ -4597,130 +4597,130 @@ of
Hi,
It looks like there is a typo in rtems-libbsd/rtems_waf/rtems.py.
rtems_share_rtems_version = os.path.join(rtems_path, 'share', 'rtems' +
rtems_version)
if not os.path.exists(os.path.join(rtems_share_rtems_version)):
ctx.fatal('RTEMS path is not valid, "%s" not found.' %
(rtems_share_rt
Hello Heinz,
have you installed RTEMS (not only the tools) in `${RTEMS_ROOT}` before
configuring libbsd? If I am not mistaken, installing RTEMS creates the
`share/rtems6` directory.
Greetings
Frank
On 1/17/23 18:11, Heinz Junkes wrote:
Hi,
It looks like there is a typo in rtems-libbsd/rtem
On 18/1/2023 6:16 am, Frank Kühndel wrote:
> have you installed RTEMS (not only the tools) in `${RTEMS_ROOT}` before
> configuring libbsd? If I am not mistaken, installing RTEMS creates the
> `share/rtems6` directory.
This is correct and it is a simple and fast key to see if a kernel of a specific
Sorry, I just saw my install script threw an error:
rtems@rtems-dev:~/MVME6100_6_INST/kernel$ ./waf bsp_defaults
--rtems-bsps=powerpc/beatnik > config.ini
No function 'bsp_defaults' defined in /home/rtems/MVME6100_6_INST/kernel/wscript
Heinz
> On 17. Jan 2023, at 21:08, Chris Johns wrote:
>
ok with
./waf bspdefaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/beatnik … it works
I had ./waf bsp_defaults :-(
rtems@rtems-dev:~/MVME6100_6_RUN/rtems/6/share$ ls -l
total 36
drwxr-xr-x 3 rtems rtems 4096 Jan 17 17:09 doc
drwxr-xr-x 3 rtems rtems 4096 Jan 17 17:42 gcc-12.2.1
drwxr-xr-x 5 rtems rtems 4096 Jan 1
On 18/1/2023 7:17 am, Heinz Junkes wrote:
> ok with
> ./waf bspdefaults --rtems-bsps=powerpc/beatnik … it works
>
> I had ./waf bsp_defaults :-(
Ah
> rtems@rtems-dev:~/MVME6100_6_RUN/rtems/6/share$ ls -l
> total 36
> drwxr-xr-x 3 rtems rtems 4096 Jan 17 17:09 doc
> drwxr-xr-x 3 rtems rtems 409
On 17/1/2023 6:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17.01.23 03:48, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 16/1/2023 6:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 16.01.23 01:35, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/1/2023 1:54 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.01.23 15:44, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> The other two patches
Hi Sebastian,
I had not got to this part of the patch set because the other was being
discussed. I thought a patch set was considerd as a whole rather than having to
deal with the extra complexity of possible splits and if they exist? If this was
pull request or merge request in a tool none of thi
On 18.01.23 04:59, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
I had not got to this part of the patch set because the other was being
discussed. I thought a patch set was considerd as a whole rather than having to
deal with the extra complexity of possible splits and if they exist? If this was
pull reques
On 17.01.23 21:13, Heinz Junkes wrote:
rtems@rtems-dev:~/MVME6100_6_INST/kernel$ ./waf bsp_defaults
--rtems-bsps=powerpc/beatnik > config.ini
If you just want to build a BSP with default values, you should simply use:
[powerpc/beatnik]
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr.
17 matches
Mail list logo