Conditional expressions with inline functions are not optimized away if
optimization is disabled. Avoid such expressions to prevent dead
branches.
---
cpukit/score/src/threadcreateidle.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/threadcreateidle.c
---
testsuites/validation/tc-score-thread.c | 74 +
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/testsuites/validation/tc-score-thread.c
b/testsuites/validation/tc-score-thread.c
index 53b939e3c5..88e86ca189 100644
--- a/testsuites/validation/tc-score-thread.c
+++ b/test
Use early returns to simplify rtems_scheduler_ident().
---
cpukit/rtems/src/schedulerident.c | 27 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulerident.c
b/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulerident.c
index e73d3d743a..60e7765ccd 100644
On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 05/07/2022 07:14, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 2:58 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 03:08, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 5/7/2022 9:44 am,
On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 07:14, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 2:58 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 03:08, Chris Johns wrote:
---
.../testsuites/validation/validation-intr.yml | 4 +++-
.../validation/validation-smp-only-0.yml | 2 --
.../validation/tc-bsp-interrupt-spurious.c| 24 ---
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/spec/build/testsuites/validation/validation-i
---
.../testsuites/validation/validation-0.yml| 1 +
.../tc-thread-idle-body-no-return.c | 194 ++
2 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testsuites/validation/tc-thread-idle-body-no-return.c
diff --git a/spec/build/testsuites/validation/validation-
> On 5 Jul 2022, at 6:23 pm, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 07:14, Chris Johns wrote:
>> O
On 7/5/22 12:31, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5 Jul 2022, at 6:23 pm, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 07:14, Chris Johns
On 05/07/2022 12:31, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5 Jul 2022, at 6:23 pm, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 07:14, Chris J
On 7/5/22 12:45, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 12:31, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5 Jul 2022, at 6:23 pm, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 08:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 5/7/2022 4:02 pm, Sebastian
Hello,
This patch adds a new GPIO API that aims at portability. GPIO of STM32F4 BSP
has been implemented using this API. The sample application code can be found
at https://github.com/dtbpkmte/GSoC-2022-RTEMS-Sample-Apps.
Best,
Duc Doan
.gitignore |
---
bsps/include/bsp/gpio2.h| 538
bsps/shared/dev/gpio/gpio.c | 196 +
spec/build/bsps/obj.yml | 2 +-
3 files changed, 735 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 bsps/include/bsp/gpio2.h
create mode 100644 bsps/shared/dev/gpio
---
bsps/arm/stm32f4/gpio/gpio.c | 595 ++
bsps/arm/stm32f4/include/bsp.h| 4 -
bsps/arm/stm32f4/include/bsp/stm32f4_gpio.h | 37 ++
bsps/arm/stm32f4/include/bsp/stm32f4_hal.h| 17 +
bsps/arm/stm32f4/start/bspstart.c | 11 +-
Hello,
Please find my patches here:
PATCH 1/4:
https://github.com/dtbpkmte/GSoC-2022-RTEMS/commit/df255bbc3ff80a596ff329964fe0673f0141a522
PATCH 2/4:
https://github.com/dtbpkmte/GSoC-2022-RTEMS/commit/5a814d4e5f8af3f78ffcf62a7e7da331843f168a
PATCH 3/4:
https://github.com/dtbpkmte/GSoC-2022-RTEM
Hello,
Have you tried a tiny bit to optimize this code because at a quick
glance, it sounds like for critical routines, you choose some slow and
complicated ways to do simple things, see a few some example below:
+static uint16_t GPIO_PIN_x[] = {
+GPIO_PIN_0,
+GPIO_PIN_1,
+GPIO_P
This function was never actually used and is dead code.
---
cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/cpu.c| 25 ---
.../cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h | 6 -
2 files changed, 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/cpu
There were two bugs with MMU page use that were partially hiding each
other. The linker script page table section was 4x the size it needed to
be and the page table allocation routine was allocating pages PTRSIZE
times larger than it needed to. On ILP32, this resulted in incorrect but
functional al
OK.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:36 PM Kinsey Moore
wrote:
> This function was never actually used and is dead code.
> ---
> cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/cpu.c| 25 ---
> .../cpu/aarch64/include/rtems/score/cpu.h | 6 -
> 2 files changed, 31 deletions(-)
>
> dif
I'm ok with this. But Chris should speak up about the Versal.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:36 PM Kinsey Moore
wrote:
> There were two bugs with MMU page use that were partially hiding each
> other. The linker script page table section was 4x the size it needed to
> be and the page table allocation r
From: Chris Johns
- This is the fix from PR105880:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53103
Closes #4661
---
.../config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 29 ++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newl
From: Chris Johns
Let the user set the test time limit in a config file to
provide site specific overrides. Optimisation can effect
the time a test may take to run.
---
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-sis.ini | 5 +-
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/gr740-sis.ini | 5 +-
tester/rtems/testin
On 5/7/2022 8:50 pm, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>
> On 7/5/22 12:45, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2022 12:31, Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
On 5 Jul 2022, at 6:23 pm, Sebastian
Huber wrote:
On 05/07/2022 10:21, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 5/7/2022 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrot
Optimization may affect the time but host speed is more likely
Ok to commit
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022, 6:51 PM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Let the user set the test time limit in a config file to
> provide site specific overrides. Optimisation can effect
> the time a test may take to run.
> ---
>
On 6/7/2022 5:38 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I'm ok with this. But Chris should speak up about the Versal.
OK to push.
Tested on Versal hardware and it boots as before. I have not returned to see if
I can get access to at least 4G of memory in the lower 32bits of the address
space. That is in the
On 06/07/2022 01:51, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
+#
+# Timeout option. This is the default for timeout for the CPU realtime
+# clock
+
+%ifn %{defined sis_time_limit}
+ %define sis_time_limit -tlim 400 s
+%endif
Making this configurable is good, but why do you impose a limit by
default? Why can't
26 matches
Mail list logo
