It has been there for a while. It is caused by the gmp configure parameter
(in gcc/makefile.in line 12644 )
I change "--host=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}
--target=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}"
to "--host=${host_alias} --target=${host_alias}", the building succeeds.
-- O
It is a RSB pacth.
git send-eamil has no information about it.
-- Original --
From:
"zhengxiaojun"
Chris should comment on this technically.
My concern is that the < and > in this patch were converted to HTML.
I do not believe this will apply. I think your email client converted it
from ASCII to HTML.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:25 AM zhengxiaojun wrote:
> It is a RSB pacth.
> git send-eamil h
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:37 AM jameszxj wrote:
> It has been there for a while. It is caused by the gmp
> configure parameter (in gcc/makefile.in line 12644 )
>
So the patch you posted fixes this?
This should be the ticket https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4208
Ryan.. the patch he posted got turn
---
.../build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/bspstm32h7b3i-dk.yml | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/bspstm32h7b3i-dk.yml
diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/bspstm32h7b3i-dk.yml
b/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/bspstm32h7b3i-dk.yml
new f
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstarthooks.c | 2 +-
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/grp.yml | 2 ++
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optpwrsupply.yml | 19 +++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optpwrsupply.yml
---
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optenuart5.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optenuart7.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optenuart8.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optenuart9.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optenusart10.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsp
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/console/console-usart1-cfg.c | 8 +---
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/grp.yml | 6 ++
.../arm/stm32h7/optusart1alternatefunc.yml| 19 +++
.../bsps/arm/stm32h7/optusart1gpiopins.yml| 19 +++
.../bsps/arm/stm32h7/optusart1
---
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/opthse.yml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/opthse.yml
b/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/opthse.yml
index 51366932e1..e5feef1114 100644
--- a/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/opthse.yml
+++ b/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/opth
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-fls.c | 2 +-
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/grp.yml | 2 ++
.../bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemflashlatency.yml | 19 +++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemflashlate
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-osc.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-osc.c
b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-osc.c
index b639c7ca36..f790201e5a 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-osc.c
++
Caveat: SDRAM 1 is completely disabled for now.
---
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemsdram1sz.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemsram1sz.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemsram2sz.yml | 5 -
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optmemsram3sz.yml | 5 -
spec/build
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-per.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-per.c
b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-per.c
index 79aa1494dd..ce6370d3d0 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-per.c
++
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal.c | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal.c
b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal.c
index d042a5b8c9..ecd8e4218a 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal.c
+++ b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/star
---
spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optvariant.yml | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optvariant.yml
b/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optvariant.yml
index 586fa2052b..5d77ece120 100644
--- a/spec/build/bsps/arm/stm32h7/optvariant.yml
+++ b
Note: the ethernet port is not presented on the board anyway.
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal-eth.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal-eth.c
b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-hal-eth.c
index b9dac6d7f9..5fc75f0147 100644
--- a/bsps/arm
The changes provided here are a result of a merge from various examples
system_stm32h7xx.c files provided by STMicroelectronics for the STM32H7B3I-DK
board with the original RTEMS file provided for the STM32H743I-EVAL2 board.
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/system_stm32h7xx.c | 51 +++--
---
bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-clk.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-clk.c
b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-clk.c
index 3e7c930201..4c25241b99 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/stm32h7-config-clk.c
+++ b/bsps/arm/st
Hello Sebastian,
I've tried my best in splitting patch into smaller relevant chunks.
Hopefully this time you will find it more appealing for merge.
Please let me know if there is still anything I shall do.
Thanks!
Karel
On 2/7/22 07:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Karel,
[...]
Could
Hello Karel,
On 01/04/2022 18:25, Karel Gardas wrote:
I've tried my best in splitting patch into smaller relevant chunks.
Hopefully this time you will find it more appealing for merge.
Please let me know if there is still anything I shall do.
the patch set looks good, I will integrate it o
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Karel,
>
> On 01/04/2022 18:25, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >
> > I've tried my best in splitting patch into smaller relevant chunks.
> > Hopefully this time you will find it more appealing for merge.
>
On 4/1/22 18:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
The issues on Github with respect to the STMicroelectronics licensing
ended up on a TODO list.
Is this in reference to their Ultimate Liberty License? Is the TODO item
to get clarification from them? Hopefully change it?
No, this is a reference to
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:37 AM jameszxj wrote:
> It has been there for a while. It is caused by the gmp
configure parameter (in gcc/makefile.in line 12644 )
>
> So the patch you posted fixes this?
Sorry for making you confuse. That patch fixed a rtems-tools error.
Send a patch file as attach
This was requested to be executed prior to relicensing to BSD-2.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/pty.h| 11 +++
cpukit/include/rtems/shell.h | 11 +--
cpukit/include/rtems/telnetd.h| 12
cpukit/libcsupport/src/chroot.c | 10 +-
cpuki
On 4/1/22 18:28, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Karel,
On 01/04/2022 18:25, Karel Gardas wrote:
I've tried my best in splitting patch into smaller relevant chunks.
Hopefully this time you will find it more appealing for merge.
Please let me know if there is still anything I shall do.
the pa
Hi, this patch file fixed a rtems-tools compiler error in MinGW. Last mail, I
made a wrong format, so I resend it as a attachment.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
26 matches
Mail list logo