Re: [PATCH v2] c-user: Document new clock manager directives

On 17/11/2021 19:32, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 16/11/2021 22:47, Chris Johns wrote: On 16/11/21 4:27 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 11/11/2021 08:02, Sebastian Huber wrote:> On 09/11/2021 13:06, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 09/11/2021 08:50, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 09/11/2021 08:41, Chris Joh

AW: AW: [PATCH 00/27] Update kern_tc in rtems 5 for ntp support

> I am fine with this change being pushed to the 5 branch but I think it needs > to built with the tier 1 archs (i386, powerpc, arm). I could compile them for the BSPs of those archs. Does it make sense to run some test in qemu? > Once pushed I would appreciate an update to: > > https://git.rt

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use identifier instead of designator

On 18/11/2021 20:32, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:05 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 18/11/2021 20:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: OK but do these terms need to be defined somewhere in the RTEMS documentation set? Hm, you mean it could be confusing since we already have "object ident

Testing rtems 7 using rtems-test

Hi Looks like another place that needs version help. rtems-test has a 6 in it somewhere that needs to be overridden. Notice that it is invoking sparc-rtems6-sis when I really want sparc-rtems7-sis. Hopefully there is an existing way to override this easily enough. Otherwise, we are missing a small

Re: Testing rtems 7 using rtems-test

On 20/11/21 5:14 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Looks like another place that needs version help. rtems-test has a 6 > in it somewhere that needs to be overridden. It is located here: https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rtems/version.cfg > Notice that it is > invoking sparc-rtems6-sis when

Re: AW: AW: [PATCH 00/27] Update kern_tc in rtems 5 for ntp support

On 19/11/21 9:32 pm, gabriel.moy...@dlr.de wrote: >> I am fine with this change being pushed to the 5 branch but I think it needs >> to built with the tier 1 archs (i386, powerpc, arm). > > I could compile them for the BSPs of those archs. Thanks. > Does it make sense to run some test in qemu?

Re: Testing rtems 7 using rtems-test

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:45 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 20/11/21 5:14 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Looks like another place that needs version help. rtems-test has a 6 > > in it somewhere that needs to be overridden. > > It is located here: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rtems