OK
On 25/6/21 1:40 pm, Alex White wrote:
> This corrects an issue where the starting line numbers of explanations
> had their last digit removed. This was caused by code left over for
> handling C file IO where the newline was included in the buffer.
> ---
> tester/covoar/Explanations.cc | 2 --
>
OK
On 25/6/21 1:37 pm, Alex White wrote:
> ---
> tester/covoar/Explanations.cc | 24 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/covoar/Explanations.cc b/tester/covoar/Explanations.cc
> index 1449fb2..4d177eb 100644
> --- a/tester/covoar/E
Hi,
Great! Thanks a lot for the review process and the merge :)
Why can't the test cases of the additional two test programs be merged
> into the existing test program smpstrongapa01?
Good point. I am looking into this right now. The original idea behind
having multiple test programs was to have
As a follow-up from the discussions here:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2021-June/068454.html
For RTEMS5 I noticed that an assertion fails for the Zedboard BSP if RTEMS is
compiled with the --enable-debug option.
The assert seems to be triggered during the execution of rtems_bsd_initial
On 25/06/2021 14:19, Richi Dubey wrote:
Why can't the test cases of the additional two test programs be merged
into the existing test program smpstrongapa01?
Good point. I am looking into this right now. The original idea behind
having multiple test programs was to have more testing - a
---
spec/build/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/grp.yml | 8
spec/build/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/optfdtcpyro.yml | 15 +++
spec/build/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/optfdtmxsz.yml | 16
spec/build/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/optfdtro.yml| 15 +++
spec/build/bsps/arm/
---
rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 7 +++
rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-nexus-bus.h | 11 +++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
b/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
index efe4fcb4..e6487470 100644
--- a/rtems
With this patch, libbsd networking is functional with
qemu-system-aarch64 -no-reboot -nographic -M xlnx-versal-virt -m
4096 -serial none -serial mon:stdio -net nic -kernel init.exe
>From what I gather, qemu is using the Cadence GEM for the
xlnx-versal-virt, although the real hw uses a slightly d
Congratulations! Did you already push a tester configuration for qemu?
I'm ok with the patches getting pushed.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 1:55 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> With this patch, libbsd networking is functional with
> qemu-system-aarch64 -no-reboot -nographic -M xlnx-versal-virt -m
> 4096 -s
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:55 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> With this patch, libbsd networking is functional with
> qemu-system-aarch64 -no-reboot -nographic -M xlnx-versal-virt -m
> 4096 -serial none -serial mon:stdio -net nic -kernel init.exe
>
> From what I gather, qemu is using the Cadence GEM
---
rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 7 +++
rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-nexus-bus.h | 11 +++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
b/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
index efe4fcb4..e6487470 100644
--- a/rtems
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:02 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Congratulations! Did you already push a tester configuration for qemu?
>
Yes, the libbsd tests work alright with the default configuration I
pushed for xilinx_versal_lp64_qemu.ini already
> I'm ok with the patches getting pushed.
>
> On Fri
I pushed this v2, thanks Joel.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:04 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> ---
> rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 7 +++
> rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-nexus-bus.h | 11 +++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/n
13 matches
Mail list logo
