Am 18.01.21 um 22:45 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 18/1/21 8:05 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
I want to backport that patch to RTEMS 5 too because this problem occurred
multiple times on the mailing list. If that is OK I'll create a separate ticket
for RTEMS 5 that describes that problem. For RTEMS 6
The following structures and functions have been implemented to
make porting of driver from FreeBSD easier.
1) struct resource_spec
2) struct device
3) struct resource
4) device_get_softc
5) bus_alloc_resources
6) bus_alloc_resource
7) bus_alloc_resource_any
8) bus_space_read_1
9) bus_spa
Does this have a ticket?
I may have missed some email about this idea. It looks like a partial
compatibility for the freebsd busspace API?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:20 AM G S Niteesh Babu
wrote:
> The following structures and functions have been implemented to
> make porting of driver from Free
Hello Niteesh,
On 19/01/2021 17:20, G S Niteesh Babu wrote:
The following structures and functions have been implemented to
make porting of driver from FreeBSD easier.
what is the long term goal of this work? We already have libbsd which
makes porting of FreeBSD drivers easy and helps to keep t
Appending an item to its priority group means adding the item to the end of
the priority queue of items with the same priority, but when/why do we do
this? Do all classic tasks have their SCHEDULER_PRIORITY_APPEND_FLAG set to
1?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:39 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@em
