Re: Proposal for hardware configuration dependent performance limits

On 25/11/2020 21:37, Chris Johns wrote: Maybe a configuration option for the RTEMS Tester should be added which allows you to set the performance hash and ignore the hash provided by the test output. This could be used to compare a custom board with values obtain from an evaluation board. Why n

[PATCH] rtems: Move "Set Errno" group to the API

--- cpukit/include/rtems/seterr.h | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/seterr.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/seterr.h index 27faca7694..711382d732 100644 --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/seterr.h +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/seterr.h @@ -19,15 +19,1

[PATCH] sapi: Remove obsolete README file

--- cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/README | 129 --- 1 file changed, 129 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/README diff --git a/cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/README b/cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/README deleted file mode 100644 index 1b6dd77619..00

How to set values depending on BSP options in spec files?

Hello, I tried to get further acquainted with the new build system and how the spec files work. Following a previous discussion (https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2020-November/067971.html) I thought adding support for the 4 kB MMU pages to the xilinx_zynq_* BSPs might be a small task to

Re: How to set values depending on BSP options in spec files?

Hello Jan, On 26/11/2020 13:41, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: For 2.) I essentially only have to update the ARM_MMU_TRANSLATION_TABLE_SIZE to the right value. The default value of 16kiB is set in arm/optmmusz.yml. For option ARM_MMU_USE_SMALL_PAGES enabled this would need to be 4MiB+16kiB. How woul

Re: [PATCH] shell: Add i2c and spi commands

Anyone against this patch? Otherwise I would like to push it somewhen in the near future. Best regards Christian Am 18.11.20 um 08:36 schrieb Christian Mauderer: This adds some commands that are usefull for debugging simple serial interfaces. Even if they are a complete re-implementation, th

[PATCH v1 1/1] bsp/xilinx_zynq: Enable support for 4kiB MMU pages

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/xilinx-zynq/configure.ac | 4 spec/build/bsps/arm/optmmusmallpages.yml | 10 ++ spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/grp.yml | 2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/xilinx-zynq/configure.ac b/c/src/l

[PATCH v1 0/1] xilinx_zynq: Enable support for 4kiB MMU pages

Hello, Thanks to the suggestions from Sebastian, here my first try to edit things in the new build system. This should enable the support for small MMU tables for the xilinx_zynq based BSPs and enable it by default. Would this also be something to backport to RTEMS5? I could prepare a patch wher

Re: Proposal for hardware configuration dependent performance limits

On 26/11/20 7:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 25/11/2020 21:37, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> Maybe a configuration option for the RTEMS Tester should be added which >>> allows >>> you to set the performance hash and ignore the hash provided by the test >>> output. >>> This could be used to compar

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE

On 25/11/20 6:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Currently, the Classic API initialization task is created with > rtems_task_create(). In order to better support applications which use > the new rtems_task_construct() directive add the > CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE configuration option

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add performance specification items

On 26/11/20 4:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 7:38 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > Hello, > > On 14/11/2020 12:59, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 13/11/2020 20:03, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > >>> +Generi

Re: [PATCH v4] c-user: CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE

On 26/11/20 4:39 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Document new configuration option > CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE. Looks good. Thanks. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] shell: Add i2c and spi commands

On 27/11/20 1:12 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote: > Anyone against this patch? Otherwise I would like to push it somewhen in the > near future. Looks good. Please push. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/list

Re: [PATCH v4] c-user: CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE

Hello Chris, Gedare, and Joel, On 26/11/2020 22:48, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/11/20 4:39 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: Document new configuration option CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_CONSTRUCT_STORAGE_SIZE. Looks good. Thanks. thanks for the constructive review. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUB