Re: Release sources

On 26/03/2020 07:54, Chris Johns wrote: On 2020-03-20 14:57, Chris Johns wrote: Only having sources in `sources` is a change from how RTEMS has been released in the past so I feel this needs to be discussed and approved before I make any changes. I will place all source in `sources`. Sorry

Re: Release sources

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 26/03/2020 07:54, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 2020-03-20 14:57, Chris Johns wrote: > > Only having sources in `sources` is a change from how RTEMS has been > released in > the past so I feel this needs

Re: Release sources

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:28 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:26 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 26/03/2020 07:54, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 2020-03-20 14:57, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> Only having sources in `sources` is a change from how RTEMS has been >> release

Re: Release sources

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:28 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:26 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 26/03/2020 07:54, Chris Johns wrote: > >> > >> On 2020-03-20 14:

Re: Release sources

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:40 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:28 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:26 AM Sebastian Huber >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 26/03/2020 07:54, Chris Jo

Re: Release sources

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:04 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:40 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:28 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:

[PATCH] Chapter on need for RTEMS-specific cross-compiler

--- user/start/tools.rst | 31 +++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/start/tools.rst b/user/start/tools.rst index c3f039b..63b6d17 100644 --- a/user/start/tools.rst +++ b/user/start/tools.rst @@ -76,3 +76,34 @@ source code used. Add ``--verbose``

Re: [PATCH] Chapter on need for RTEMS-specific cross-compiler

Hi Utkarsh, Thank you this looks pretty good. Did you build the docs with your changes to see they look right to you? On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57 AM utkarsh.ra...@gmail.com wrote: > > --- > user/start/tools.rst | 31 +++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > diff

Re: [PATCH] Chapter on need for RTEMS-specific cross-compiler

Yes, I did. They looked good to me, although I am willing to change the format based on further feedback. On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:49 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Utkarsh, > > Thank you this looks pretty good. Did you build the docs with your > changes to see they look right to you? > > On Thu,

[PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

--- testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c| 87 - testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.doc | 9 ++- testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.scn | 4 - 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c b/testsuites/

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 22:59 Eshan dhawan, wrote: > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c| 87 - > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.doc | 9 ++- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.scn | 4 - > 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > d

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

One more thing, If Vaibhav has provided you this source code and you modified then put Vaibhav's name alongwith your name as Copyright info. On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 23:10 Aditya Upadhyay, wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 22:59 Eshan dhawan, wrote: > >> --- >> testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

Hi Joel, Can we also include or make a separate section for those functions that needs reentrant version of implementation. When I was GSoC student, I had struggled a lot making methods reentrant as It was challenging ;). We can also add others sections like what should go into Newlib-cygwin and w

Re: [PATCH] Chapter on need for RTEMS-specific cross-compiler

On 26/03/2020 17:56, utkarsh.ra...@gmail.com wrote: --- user/start/tools.rst | 31 +++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/start/tools.rst b/user/start/tools.rst index c3f039b..63b6d17 100644 --- a/user/start/tools.rst +++ b/user/start/tools.rst @@

[Suggestion required : Testing project benifits for rtems]

Hello developers, I was actually looking for feedback on your feedback on project #3892. I made the draft proposal available here , Dr. Gedare has given me suggestion to stren

Re: GSoC Students: Submit Draft Applications

Hello, I have updated the draft from my dashboard, Please check it, It should be visible to you now. Regards Anmol Mishra On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:50 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Students, > > I see several of you have submitted "Draft, shared" in GSoC App. That > is good, but I also want you t

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

This code was already present in the psxtests written by Vaibhav last year I haven't changed any information related to copyright. If anything needs to be changed. I will change it in the next patch. On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:12 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > One more thing, If Vaibhav has provid

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:51 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > Hi Joel, > Ticket for unsupportable methods in the POSIX Guide: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3918#ticket > > Can we also include or make a separate section for those functions that > needs reentrant version of implementation. When I

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

Rule-of-thumb: If you add at least 3 SLOC to a file, add your copyright to it. On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:27 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > This code was already present in the psxtests written by Vaibhav last year > I haven't changed any information related to copyright. > If anything needs to be cha

RSB Release source download is broken ...

Hi, The RSB download of source for a release is broken here: Build Set: Time 0:00:03.530061 Build Set: devel/qemu-couverture for solaris error: devel/qemu-couverture:23: cannot find file: devel/glib-2.39.3-1 Build Set: Time 0:00:00.000958 Build FAILED Anyone know what this is about and able to

[PATCH v10] tests for fenv.h functions

--- testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c| 89 - testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.doc | 9 ++- testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.scn | 4 - 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c b/testsuites/

Re: RSB Release source download is broken ...

On 2020-03-27 09:12, Chris Johns wrote: Anyone know what this is about and able to help? This patch moves a config file and it still referenced ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id=f93fcef875560f6a8ac7a3a541e4a96f73751553 Chris

Re: [PATCH v10] tests for fenv.h functions

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:15 PM Eshan dhawan wrote: > > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c| 89 - > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.doc | 9 ++- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.scn | 4 - > 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Fwd: Blog post about static analyzer in GCC 10

FYI -- Forwarded message - From: David Malcolm via Gcc Date: Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:30 PM Subject: Blog post about static analyzer in GCC 10 To: I wrote a blog post "Static analysis in GCC 10" giving an idea of the current status of the -fanalyzer feature: https://developers.red

Re: RSB Release source download is broken ...

On 2020-03-27 09:21, Chris Johns wrote: On 2020-03-27 09:12, Chris Johns wrote: Anyone know what this is about and able to help? This patch moves a config file and it still referenced ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id=f93fcef875560f6a8ac7a3a541e4a96f73751553 I have

Re: Release sources

On 2020-03-27 03:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:04 AM Gedare Bloom > wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:40 AM Joel Sherrill mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Gedare Bloom mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> wrote: >>