On 18/9/19 4:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 18/09/2019 07:40, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 18/9/19 3:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 17/09/2019 08:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/09/2019 08:07, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 17/9/19 3:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
On 18/09/2019 10:29, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/9/19 4:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 18/09/2019 07:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/9/19 3:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/09/2019 08:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/09/2019 08:07, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/9/19 3:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrot
On 18/9/19 6:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 18/09/2019 10:29, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 18/9/19 4:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 18/09/2019 07:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/9/19 3:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/09/2019 08:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>
>>
>> On
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:13 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 18/9/19 7:31 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > diff --git a/lvgl/hello/wscript b/lvgl/hello/wscript
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..c706491
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lvgl/hello/wscript
> > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > +# Copyright 2
Hello Vijay,
I tried it and the patch works. But there is a point that might could be
improved:
My application can still call bbb_register_i2c_0(). If I do that it
returns an error code. That's better than if it would just initialize
the bus twice. But it's not very clear from a user perspective.
---
rtems.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems.py b/rtems.py
index 2e57de4..af4b5fd 100644
--- a/rtems.py
+++ b/rtems.py
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ def check_cc(conf, *k, **kw):
kw['fragment'] = test_application()
conf.check_cc(*k, **kw)
-def ch
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:27 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:13 AM Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 18/9/19 7:31 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>> > diff --git a/lvgl/hello/wscript b/lvgl/hello/wscript
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index
---
bsps/arm/beagle/i2c/bbb-i2c.c | 6 +++---
bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp/i2c.h | 10 --
bsps/arm/beagle/start/bspstart.c | 16
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/i2c/bbb-i2c.c b/bsps/arm/beagle/i2c/bbb-i2c.c
index 37b888
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:29 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
> Hello Vijay,
>
> I tried it and the patch works. But there is a point that might could be
> improved:
>
> My application can still call bbb_register_i2c_0(). If I do that it
> returns an error code. That's better than if it would just i
Pushed.
Thanks
Chris
On 19/9/19 4:14 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> ---
> rtems.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rtems.py b/rtems.py
> index 2e57de4..af4b5fd 100644
> --- a/rtems.py
> +++ b/rtems.py
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ def check_cc(conf, *k, *
On 19/9/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> Sorry, this patch doesn't seem to work properly, I have modified it a bit and
> attached the v4 here. This v4 needs the rtems_waf typo patch that I recently
> posted.
Thanks. This fragment ...
if bld.env.LIBPATH_libbsd and bld.env.LIBPATH_liblv
On 18/9/19 6:56 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Building the unstable RTEMS 6 toolchain results in an endless build of
>> automake
>> with this patch on FreeBSD 12.
>
> OK. I will have a look tomorrow.
The copy of the patch from rtems/config/tools/rtems-automake-1.12.6-1.cfg to the
bare/devel resulted
On 19/09/2019 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/9/19 6:56 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
Building the unstable RTEMS 6 toolchain results in an endless build of automake
with this patch on FreeBSD 12.
OK. I will have a look tomorrow.
The copy of the patch from rtems/config/tools/rtems-automake-1.12.6-1
13 matches
Mail list logo
