Hi
It would be very helpful to have folks look at the outstanding
issues and help resolve them.
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/rtems
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Joel,
I have experiences on verifying reports produced by static analysis tools.
I would like to help this.
Mingyu Li
2018-09-12 23:08 GMT+08:00 Joel Sherrill :
> Hi
>
> It would be very helpful to have folks look at the outstanding
> issues and help resolve them.
>
> https://scan.coverity.c
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:38 AM 李MY wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I have experiences on verifying reports produced by static analysis tools.
> I would like to help this.
>
Awesome! Please request access.
Looking at the current issues, I think a fair number are in code we merged
from upstream projects
Hello,
We are building our RTEMS applications with -std=c99 and other compiler warning
switches.
On the latest RTEMS master and RTEMS 5 toolchain ( from yesterday ), when I
include the -std=c99 compiler switch, the compilation fails in an RTEMS header.
Is it not recommended to use the “-std= “ s
Hello Alan,
On 12/09/2018 20:45, Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820) wrote:
Hello,
We are building our RTEMS applications with -std=c99 and other
compiler warning switches.
On the latest RTEMS master and RTEMS 5 toolchain ( from yesterday ),
when I include the -std=c99 compiler switch, the compil
