Re: [GSOC] Weekly report

Hello Vidushi, do you already have something that we can try out? - Vidushi Vashishth schrieb: > Hi! > > As asked by my mentor, I am going to post my weekly project target on the > mailing list every Monday. For this week I have the following planned: > > 1) Develop use cases (common devel

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 20 May 2018

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell >>> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 21 May 2

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell, > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell >>> wrote: >>> On Sun

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell, >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 21 Ma

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

CPU-rtems5-objdump Probably i386. Aren't you running pc386? Not sparc/erc32 or Leon On Mon, May 21, 2018, 6:35 AM Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2018

Re: LIST OF IO BENCHMARKS

"License type customized" is not clear to me what that means, it would be worth explaining On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sat, May 19, 2018, 5:06 PM Udit agarwal wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> Udit, >>> >>> Ca

Re: Where the script downloads the release notes page from Trac?

Dannie, The wkhtmltopdf tool grabs from a URL, so that is where the "download" is happening. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Danxue Huang wrote: > Chris, > > I went through the process to generate the release notes and I am able to do > it right now. Just wondering where the script downloads th

Re: LIST OF IO BENCHMARKS

Hi Gedare, Hi Joel, On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > "License type customized" is not clear to me what that means, it would > be worth explaining > > In case of IOZONE's license , by customized license type, I just mean that

Re: [GSOC] Weekly report

Hey! I was facing a lot of problems trying to get everything running on MacOS. Babeltrace in particular had a lot of dependencies and it became exceedingly difficult to build it. So after Gedare's suggestion during the weekly meeting, I switched to Ubuntu on my old laptop. The process took a lot o

Re: LIST OF IO BENCHMARKS

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Udit agarwal wrote: > Hi Gedare, Hi Joel, > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> "License type customized" is not clear to me what that means, it would >> be worth explaining >> >> > In case of IOZONE's license >

covoar symbol mismatch

Hi I am not sure why this is happening but this is an example of the symbol it is finding: [joel@rtbf64c samples]$ i386-rtems5-nm base_sp.exe | grep -i csw 001237d0 r CSWTCH.1 001216c0 r CSWTCH.108 "r" The symbol is in a read only data section. These symbols are not code and not in t

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: > CPU-rtems5-objdump > > sparc-rtems5-objdump worked , thanks . I can see some mismatches in the disassembly . Probably i386. Aren't you running pc386? > > I'm running sparc > Not sparc/erc32 or Leon > > On Mon, May 21, 2018, 6:35 AM Cillian O'Don

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> CPU-rtems5-objdump >> >> sparc-rtems5-objdump worked , thanks . > I can see some mismatches in the disassembly . > I'm building sparc now. What mismatche

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> CPU-rtems5-objdump >>> >>> sparc-rtems5-objdump worked , thanks . >> I can see some mismatches

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wr

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Mon, May 21,

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 22 May 2018 at 00:33, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 May 2018 at 00:33, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

Yeah I can see the difference in the objdump, it's optimized out though, so not very helpful but the addresses do match the covoar output. That's with -O2. I'll have to rebuild. Vijay you seeing the ... optimized out stuff * 1333

Symbol Size Variance

Hi Attached is a shell script (pokes Chris) which calculates the size of the specified symbol across a set of .exe files. [joel@rtbf64c samples]$ /tmp/cmp_sizes -a sparc -s _Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error *.exe Size report for _Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error base_sp.exe - 0x4000c5a

Re: Symbol Size Variance

On 22/5/18 9:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Attached is a shell script (pokes Chris) which calculates the size of  > the specified symbol across a set of .exe files.  > > [joel@rtbf64c samples]$ /tmp/cmp_sizes -a sparc -s > _Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error *.exe > Size report for _Workspace_Al