[PATCH 1/2] Avoid hard coded GCC binary paths

In order to build a tool chain with Ada support a native GCC with Ada support of the same version as the cross compiler is required. The RSB used hard coded paths for the gcc and g++ programs. This forced the RSB user to change the main GCC installation of the machine to build a particular RTEMS

[PATCH 2/2] 5: Add versions to file names

--- rtems/config/5/rtems-default.bset | 4 ++-- rtems/config/5/rtems-epiphany.bset| 4 ++-- rtems/config/5/rtems-m32c.bset| 4 ++-- rtems/config/5/rtems-or1k.bset

Re: Build Failures on Master

On 27/01/18 23:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi This bsp builder test report shows about 25 build failures. https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000333.html The problems seem to be an issue with the BSP builder: ../configure --target=powerpc-rtems5 --enable-rtemsbsp=qoriq_e6500_64

Re: Build Failures on Master

On 31/01/18 12:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 27/01/18 23:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi This bsp builder test report shows about 25 build failures. https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000333.html The problems seem to be an issue with the BSP builder: ../configure --target=po

Re: New BSP source structure

On 31/01/18 00:12, Chris Johns wrote: On 31/01/2018 01:16, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 29/01/18 21:45, Chris Johns wrote: On 29/1/18 6:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, now that all BSP header files are in * bsps/include * bsps/@RTEM

Re: Contribute to project

Sir, Thanks for the guidance. Thanks and Regards Abhinav jain On Jan 30, 2018 11:30 PM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote: Hello Abhinav, On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Abhinav Jain wrote: > Sir, > > I have gone through the links provided in the previous mail and the concept > that I have understood t

Re: Contribute to project

The MMU support is a very challenging project. The scope of the project and potential use cases must be determined. You need a lot of experience to design good APIs and it helps if you know the APIs for this kind of stuff on other systems like QNX, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. For the architecture supp

Re: Build Failures on Master

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 31/01/18 12:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> On 27/01/18 23:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> This bsp builder test report shows about 25 build failures. >>> >>> https://lists.rtems.org/p

[PATCH] sparc/*/linkcmds*: Move ENTRY() from linkcmds.base to top linkcmds

This was at the request of a user to make it easier to have a custom entry point. This way they just provide their own top level linkcmds and include linkcmds.base. Updates #3520. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/erc32/startup/linkcmds | 2 ++ c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon2/startup/linkcmds

gdb 8.1 released

Hi Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new tools. :) Should we bump to 8.1? I would think it makes sense if it doesn't break anything. Thoughts? --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/lis

Re: Contribute to project

Sir, Thanks for the guidance. The mail is very informative and I will follow the way suggested by you. Thanks and regards Abhinav Jain On Jan 31, 2018 5:41 PM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > The MMU support is a very challenging project. The scope of the projec

Re: New BSP source structure

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 31/01/18 00:12, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 31/01/2018 01:16, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Sebastian Huber >>> wrote: On 29/01/18 21:45, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 29/1/18 6:32 pm, Se

ARM and PowerPC Shared Linkcmds Alignment Issue

Hi I am debugging a paravirtualized BSP. On the ARM and PowerPC, we want to use the linkcmds.share infrastructure but both use ALIGN_WITH_INPUT for the first .data section. For these BSPs, we need the .data to be on a 4K page boundary. Would adding something like bsp_section_rwbarrier_align be OK

Re: Build Failures on Master

On 01/02/2018 03:14, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > > > On 31/01/18 12:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 27/01/18 23:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > >

Re: gdb 8.1 released

On 01/02/2018 03:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new tools. :) Hehe > > Should we bump to 8.1? I would think it makes sense if it doesn't break > anything. > > Thoughts? > Does "not break anything" mean getting test results posted a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] 5: Add versions to file names

Looks good. Thank you and sorry for the confusion. On 31/01/2018 19:33, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > rtems/config/5/rtems-default.bset | 4 > ++-- > rtems/config/5/rtems-epiphany.bset| 4 > ++-- > rtems/config/5/rtems-m3

Re: Build Failures on Master

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 01/02/2018 03:14, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Sebastian Huber > > mailto:sebastian.huber@ > embedded-brains.de>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 31/01/18 12:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > >

Re: gdb 8.1 released

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 01/02/2018 03:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new tools. > :) > > Hehe > > > > > Should we bump to 8.1? I would think it makes sense if it doesn't break > anything. > > > > Thou

Re: Build Failures on Master

On 01/02/2018 08:58, Chris Johns wrote: > I will sort this out. Fixed: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/vc/2018-January/013695.html Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gdb 8.1 released

On 01/02/2018 09:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chris Johns > wrote: > On 01/02/2018 03:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new > tools. :) > > Hehe > > > > >

Re: Build Failures on Master

On 01/02/2018 09:14, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I did another build overnight and I don't see it in the list archives by date. > But when I > go by author, I see it. There are failures in it that I can't reproduce by > hand. > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000376.html >

[PATCH 4.10] Backport --rsb-file support for releases.

Add for long term support. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] sb: Backport from 4.11 the --rsb-file with releases fixes.

Close #3286 --- source-builder/sb/download.py | 16 ++-- source-builder/sb/options.py | 89 ++- source-builder/sb/version.py | 24 +--- 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/sb/download.py b/source-buil