Re: Self-contained POSIX synchronization objects for RTEMS 4.12?

On 20/9/17 3:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > There are some checks that help to debug broken applications. For example the > heap protection, the deadlock detection, the file descriptor reference > counting > and simple parameter validation. Yes I agree some of these are useful and I am not agai

Re: pthread_getattr_np does not work

On 20/09/17 09:07, xuelin.t...@qkmtech.com wrote: I am not sure this is a bug or I just use it in a wrong way. If anyone has encountered the same situation like me, I will send a ticket. Your use case looks all right, if this doesn't work, then its a bug from my point of view. -- Sebastian

[PATCH] posix: Implement self-contained POSIX semaphores

For semaphore object pointer and object validation see POSIX_SEMAPHORE_VALIDATE_OBJECT(). Destruction or close of a busy semaphore returns an error status. The object is not flushed. Update #3116. --- cpukit/posix/Makefile.am | 3 +- cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/se

[PATCH] RTEMS: Make sem_t self-contained

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Huber --- newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/semaphore.h | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/semaphore.h b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/semaphore.h index e3c61da04..44ecc58f4 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/sys/r

Re: Many BSPs Fail with Debug Enabled

On 19/09/17 21:18, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I am starting to investigate the failures but 41 BSPs fail to build with --enable-rtems-debug and --enable-tests=all. Some fail because tests are too large to fit with debug enabled. These fail with an error related to bsp_interrupt_assert: log/powe

Re: RTEMS Tester Kit

Hi Chris, Lurking RPi Linux user here.. Are you talking about having the RPI control the reset line to one or more targets? Would a GPIO pin be sufficient for that, or would we need another output? Also, what would the serial port on the Pi be used for? Would it connect to a test target serial po

Re: Many BSPs Fail with Debug Enabled

Thanks for fixing so many. Now it is down to these failures. These are BSPs where enabling debug resulted in more tests not fitting. Do we add all of these test build/link failures to the tcfg? log/arm-lm3s3749.log log/arm-lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth.log log/arm-lpc2362.log log/arm-lpc23xx_tli800.lo

Re: RTEMS Tester Kit

On 21/09/2017 03:21, Alan Cudmore wrote: > Lurking RPi Linux user here.. Nice and thanks for responding. > Are you talking about having the RPI control the reset line to one or more > targets? Yes. I was thinking about insecure telnet access to pulse a GPIO pin. > Would a GPIO pin be sufficien