Hello Aditya Upadhyay,
please don't send me e-mails directly. Use the devel@rtems.org mailing
list instead.
On 07/06/17 11:21, aditya upadhyay wrote:
Hello Sebastian Huber,
I am Aditya Upadhyay, selected in GSoC 2017, for RTEMS organization.
My project is POSIX Compliance. I have to work o
On 06/06/17 18:58, Hesham Almatary wrote:
Originally RTEMS had a one big linkcmd for each platform, which
defines linker symbols (used in C code) and required sections. This
has been improved with current BSPs (like ARM-based ones), by
splitting up shared linkcmd parts (linkcmd base) and BSP spe
Hello,
I updated the tool chain (RSB) to use the latest Newlib snapshot with
patches to move some POSIX header files to Newlib:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2833
The legacy network stack and the libbsd (I have to update it tomorrow)
use now the same standard header files provided by Newlib
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello Aditya Upadhyay,
>
> please don't send me e-mails directly. Use the devel@rtems.org mailing list
> instead.
>
>
> On 07/06/17 11:21, aditya upadhyay wrote:
>>
>> Hello Sebastian Huber,
>>
>> I am Aditya Upadhyay, selected in GSoC 2017,
2017-06-07 14:44 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Huber :
> On 06/06/17 18:58, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>
> Originally RTEMS had a one big linkcmd for each platform, which
>> defines linker symbols (used in C code) and required sections. This
>> has been improved with current BSPs (like ARM-based ones), by
>> sp
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote:
> 2017-06-07 14:44 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Huber
> :
>>
>> On 06/06/17 18:58, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>>
>>> Originally RTEMS had a one big linkcmd for each platform, which
>>> defines linker symbols (used in C code) and required sections. This
>>>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Denis Obrezkov wrote:
> 2017-06-07 14:44 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Huber
> :
>>
>> On 06/06/17 18:58, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>>
>>> Originally RTEMS had a one big linkcmd for each platform, which
>>> defines linker symbols (used in C code) and required sections. This
>>>
On 07/06/2017 23:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> +%patch add gcc -p1
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=gcc/cp/Make-lang.in;h=b09fb02bb4c0d16fc2c842bec4069c033897b5f2;hp=e98beb1e33e4bcc4943361c559ae71b7eb345346;hb=1e5f1089dec3af328fd03125d6778f666d0bd4e4;hpb=88375bb2ba8b9004a9924
On 08/06/17 00:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 07/06/2017 23:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
+%patch add gcc -p1
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=gcc/cp/Make-lang.in;h=b09fb02bb4c0d16fc2c842bec4069c033897b5f2;hp=e98beb1e33e4bcc4943361c559ae71b7eb345346;hb=1e5f1089dec3af328fd03125d677
---
source-builder/sb/download.py | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/download.py b/source-builder/sb/download.py
index dd7880d..984bbaa 100644
--- a/source-builder/sb/download.py
+++ b/source-builder/sb/download.py
@@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ def _http_parser(source,
On 08/06/2017 15:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/06/17 00:33, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 07/06/2017 23:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> +%patch add gcc -p1
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=gcc/cp/Make-lang.in;h=b09fb02bb4c0d16fc2c842bec4069c033897b5f2;hp=e98beb1e33e4bcc49
On 08/06/2017 15:22, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> ---
> source-builder/sb/download.py | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/source-builder/sb/download.py b/source-builder/sb/download.py
> index dd7880d..984bbaa 100644
> --- a/source-builder/sb/download.py
> +++ b/source-builder/
On 07/06/2017 23:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> @@ -180,12 +181,9 @@ def _http_parser(source, pathkey, config, opts):
> raise error.general('gitweb.cgi path missing p or h: %s' %
> (url))
> source['file'] = '%s-%s.patch' % (p, h)
> #
> -# Check the sour
13 matches
Mail list logo